Predictions / Football / World. AFC Champions League / Adelaide United vs Công An Nhân Dân

Prediction Audit: Adelaide United vs Công An Nhân Dân Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Aug 11, 2026 - 09:30
0 1.32
2 1.28
xG Accuracy: 57%

The model missed the final outcome (Công An Nhân Dân win 0–2).

The model had projected Adelaide United at 36.1%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Adelaide United Công An Nhân Dân ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 0-2 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Adelaide United higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Adelaide United -24.7 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Adelaide United 36.1% 60.8% -24.7 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.6% 20.4% +9.2 pp Model Higher
Công An Nhân Dân 34.2% 18.8% +15.4 pp Model Edge

The closing market estimates Adelaide United's win probability at 60.8%, compared with the model's estimate of 36.1%, a difference of 24.7 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Công An Nhân Dân win 0–2.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
  • 1X2: model leaned Adelaide United; match finished Công An Nhân Dân

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Adelaide United by 24.7 percentage points (60.8% vs model 36.1%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Aug 11, 2026 · 09:29 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Adelaide United 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Công An Nhân Dân 34.2%
    • xG · Adelaide United 1.32 — Công An Nhân Dân 1.28
  2. Aug 11, 2026 · 08:59 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Adelaide United 1.56 · Draw 4.65 · Công An Nhân Dân 5.05
    • Implied 1X2 · Adelaide United 60.8% · Draw 20.4% · Công An Nhân Dân 18.8%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Aug 11, 2026 · 09:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Adelaide United 1.56 · Draw 4.65 · Công An Nhân Dân 5.05
    • Implied 1X2 · Adelaide United 60.8% · Draw 20.4% · Công An Nhân Dân 18.8%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Aug 11, 2026 · 09:30 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Công An Nhân Dân win · 0–2
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 51/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (25 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Pricing remains divergent
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Betting Confidence 33/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 05, 2026 · 02:04 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3017568

Closing Odds 1.56
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Công An Nhân Dân win · Adelaide United 0–2 Công An Nhân Dân
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: AFC Champions League
  • Fixture: Adelaide United vs Công An Nhân Dân
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-11 09:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Away 34.2%
  • xG (showing): Adelaide United 1.32 — Công An Nhân Dân 1.28 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 30, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Adelaide United & Công An Nhân Dân!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
AFC Champions League AFC Champions League — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Al Ain 1 1 0 0 3
2 Esteghlal FC 1 1 0 0 3
3 Al-Qadisiyah FC 1 1 0 0 3
4 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 1 1 0 0 3
5 Shabab Al Ahli Dubai 1 1 0 0 3
6 Neftchi 1 1 0 0 3
7 Al-Ittihad FC 1 0 1 0 1
8 Al Shamal 1 0 1 0 1
9 Pakhtakor 1 0 1 0 1
10 Al-Ahli Jeddah 1 0 1 0 1
11 Al-Wasl FC 1 0 0 1 0
12 Al-Gharafa 1 0 0 1 0
13 Al Quwa Al Jawiya 1 0 0 1 0
14 Tractor Sazi 1 0 0 1 0
15 Al Sadd 1 0 0 1 0
16 Al-Nassr 1 0 0 1 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Al Ain 1 4 0 +4 3
2 Esteghlal FC 1 3 0 +3 3
3 Al-Qadisiyah FC 1 2 1 +1 3
4 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 1 2 1 +1 3
5 Shabab Al Ahli Dubai 1 1 0 +1 3
6 Neftchi 1 1 0 +1 3
7 Al-Ittihad FC 1 1 1 0 1
8 Al Shamal 1 1 1 0 1
9 Pakhtakor 1 1 1 0 1
10 Al-Ahli Jeddah 1 1 1 0 1
11 Al-Wasl FC 1 1 2 -1 0
12 Al-Gharafa 1 1 2 -1 0
13 Al Quwa Al Jawiya 1 0 1 -1 0
14 Tractor Sazi 1 0 1 -1 0
15 Al Sadd 1 0 3 -3 0
16 Al-Nassr 1 0 4 -4 0
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Al Ain 1 — — — 3
2 Esteghlal FC 1 — — — 3
3 Al-Qadisiyah FC 1 — — — 3
4 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 1 — — — 3
5 Shabab Al Ahli Dubai 1 — — — 3
6 Neftchi 1 — — — 3
7 Al-Ittihad FC 1 — — — 1
8 Al Shamal 1 — — — 1
9 Pakhtakor 1 — — — 1
10 Al-Ahli Jeddah 1 — — — 1
11 Al-Wasl FC 1 — — — 0
12 Al-Gharafa 1 — — — 0
13 Al Quwa Al Jawiya 1 — — — 0
14 Tractor Sazi 1 — — — 0
15 Al Sadd 1 — — — 0
16 Al-Nassr 1 — — — 0