Prediction Audit: Laval vs Quevilly Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Jul 15, 2026 - 16:00
5 1.38
0 1.22
xG Accuracy: 26%

AI correctly predicted the Laval win.

The match finished 5–0, validating the model's directional assessment.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (5 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Laval Laval ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 5-0 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Moderate Disagreement

The closing market prices Laval higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Laval -7.1 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Laval 39.0% 46.1% -7.1 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.5% 28.3% +1.2 pp Aligned
Quevilly 31.5% 25.6% +5.9 pp Model Higher

The closing market estimates Laval's win probability at 46.1%, compared with the model's estimate of 39.0%, a difference of 7.1 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Laval win 5–0).

Market Assessment

The market and model broadly agree on Laval. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.

  • Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 5 goals materialised

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (5 goals)

Market lesson

Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Laval higher (46.1% vs model 39.0%, 7.1 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Laval win 5–0).

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Jul 15, 2026 · 19:25 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Laval 39.0% · Draw 29.5% · Quevilly 31.5%
    • xG · Laval 1.38 — Quevilly 1.22
  2. Jul 15, 2026 · 15:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Laval 1.93 · Draw 3.14 · Quevilly 3.47
    • Implied 1X2 · Laval 46.1% · Draw 28.3% · Quevilly 25.6%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Jul 15, 2026 · 15:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Laval 1.93 · Draw 3.14 · Quevilly 3.47
    • Implied 1X2 · Laval 46.1% · Draw 28.3% · Quevilly 25.6%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Jul 15, 2026 · 16:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Laval win · 5–0
  6. FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe
Historical Decision No Primary Bet
Outcome Validated
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 75/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 64/100
Betting Confidence 78/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 26, 2026 · 05:12 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1822193

Closing Odds 1.93
AI Fair Odds
CLV Pending
Final Result Laval win · Laval 5–0 Quevilly
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Club Friendlies
  • Fixture: Laval vs Quevilly-Rouen
  • Kickoff: 2026-07-15 16:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 10.0% · Draw 45.0% · Away 45.0%
  • xG (showing): Laval 1.38 — Quevilly-Rouen 1.22 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): See the Over/Under and BTTS cards for any directional lean text.
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 18, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Laval & Quevilly!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions