The model missed the final outcome (Ústí nad Orlicí win 0–6).
The model had projected Chrudim II at 36.1%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (6 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Chrudim II Ústí nad Orlicí ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 0-6 ✖ Incorrect
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 6 goals materialised
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (6 goals)
Market lesson
The full-time result was Ústí nad Orlicí win 0–6, which did not match the model's pre-match lean on 1X2.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Aug 09, 2026 · 02:07 UTC Forecast generated
- xG · Chrudim II 1.32 — Ústí nad Orlicí 1.28
-
Aug 15, 2026 · 14:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Ústí nad Orlicí win · 0–6
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pending
- No strong statistical edge
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation pending
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotReview FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Chrudim II & Ústí nad Orlicí!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
4. liga - Divizie C — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kosmonosy | 10 | 8 | 1 | 1 | 25 |
| 2 | Přepeře | 10 | 8 | 0 | 2 | 24 |
| 3 | Vysoké Mýto | 9 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 23 |
| 4 | Ústí nad Orlicí | 9 | 6 | 2 | 1 | 20 |
| 5 | Turnov | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 |
| 6 | Trutnov | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 16 |
| 7 | Chlumec nad Cidlinou | 9 | 5 | 1 | 3 | 16 |
| 8 | Spartak Police n/Metují | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 |
| 9 | Hlinsko | 10 | 4 | 1 | 5 | 13 |
| 10 | Kolín | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 |
| 11 | Slavia Hradec Králové | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| 12 | Vykan | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 10 |
| 13 | Dvůr Králové | 9 | 3 | 1 | 5 | 10 |
| 14 | Svitavy | 9 | 1 | 2 | 6 | 5 |
| 15 | Letohrad | 10 | 0 | 1 | 9 | 1 |
| 16 | Chrudim II | 9 | 0 | 1 | 8 | 1 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kosmonosy | 10 | 33 | 15 | +18 | 25 |
| 2 | Přepeře | 10 | 32 | 10 | +22 | 24 |
| 3 | Vysoké Mýto | 9 | 29 | 14 | +15 | 23 |
| 4 | Turnov | 10 | 25 | 18 | +7 | 17 |
| 5 | Ústí nad Orlicí | 9 | 20 | 8 | +12 | 20 |
| 6 | Hlinsko | 10 | 18 | 21 | -3 | 13 |
| 7 | Vykan | 10 | 18 | 21 | -3 | 10 |
| 8 | Trutnov | 9 | 17 | 12 | +5 | 16 |
| 9 | Spartak Police n/Metují | 10 | 17 | 19 | -2 | 13 |
| 10 | Chlumec nad Cidlinou | 9 | 16 | 13 | +3 | 16 |
| 11 | Slavia Hradec Králové | 10 | 16 | 21 | -5 | 11 |
| 12 | Kolín | 9 | 15 | 16 | -1 | 12 |
| 13 | Letohrad | 10 | 12 | 37 | -25 | 1 |
| 14 | Chrudim II | 9 | 12 | 39 | -27 | 1 |
| 15 | Dvůr Králové | 9 | 9 | 13 | -4 | 10 |
| 16 | Svitavy | 9 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 5 |