Predictions / Football / Slovenia. 2. SNL / Dekani vs Jesenice

Prediction Audit: Dekani vs Jesenice Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Aug 21, 2026 - 15:00
0 1.42
2 1.18
xG Accuracy: 54%

The model missed the final outcome (Jesenice win 0–2).

The model had projected Dekani at 40.9%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Dekani Jesenice ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 2-1, 0-1, 2-0 0-2 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Dekani higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Dekani -20.6 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Dekani 40.9% 61.5% -20.6 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.4% 21.4% +8.0 pp Model Higher
Jesenice 29.7% 17.1% +12.6 pp Model Edge

The closing market estimates Dekani's win probability at 61.5%, compared with the model's estimate of 40.9%, a difference of 20.6 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Jesenice win 0–2.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
  • 1X2: model leaned Dekani; match finished Jesenice

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Dekani by 20.6 percentage points (61.5% vs model 40.9%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Aug 21, 2026 · 15:00 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Dekani 41.0% · Draw 29.4% · Jesenice 29.6%
    • xG · Dekani 1.42 — Jesenice 1.18
  2. Aug 21, 2026 · 14:31 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Dekani 1.45 · Draw 4.11 · Jesenice 5.12
    • Implied 1X2 · Dekani 61.1% · Draw 21.6% · Jesenice 17.3%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Aug 21, 2026 · 15:00 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Dekani 1.46 · Draw 4.19 · Jesenice 5.25
    • Implied 1X2 · Dekani 61.5% · Draw 21.4% · Jesenice 17.1%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Aug 21, 2026 · 15:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Jesenice win · 0–2
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 53/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (21 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Pricing remains divergent
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Betting Confidence 34/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 15, 2026 · 01:14 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-4023014

Closing Odds 1.46
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Jesenice win · Dekani 0–2 Jesenice
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: 2. SNL
  • Fixture: Dekani vs Jesenice
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-21 15:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.0% · Draw 29.4% · Away 29.6%
  • xG (showing): Dekani 1.42 — Jesenice 1.18 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +0.5%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.1% · No 45.9%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.1% · No 45.9%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.4%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Dekani & Jesenice!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
2. SNL 2. SNL — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Tabor Sežana 8 6 1 1 19
2 Triglav 8 5 1 2 16
3 Beltinci 7 4 1 2 13
4 Ilirija 8 4 1 3 13
5 Jesenice 7 4 1 2 13
6 Dren Vrhnika 7 4 1 2 13
7 Rudar 7 4 0 3 12
8 Bilje 7 4 0 3 12
9 Dekani 8 3 3 2 12
10 Bistrica 8 3 1 4 10
11 Slovan Ljubljana 7 3 1 3 10
12 Primorje 8 2 2 4 8
13 Krka 7 2 1 4 7
14 Krško 7 1 2 4 5
15 Dravinja 7 1 1 5 4
16 Brežice 7 0 1 6 1
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Tabor Sežana 8 18 6 +12 19
2 Beltinci 7 16 9 +7 13
3 Rudar 7 15 12 +3 12
4 Triglav 8 14 5 +9 16
5 Bilje 7 14 14 0 12
6 Ilirija 8 13 6 +7 13
7 Jesenice 7 11 8 +3 13
8 Dren Vrhnika 7 10 7 +3 13
9 Bistrica 8 9 13 -4 10
10 Primorje 8 9 14 -5 8
11 Krka 7 8 11 -3 7
12 Slovan Ljubljana 7 8 14 -6 10
13 Brežice 7 7 16 -9 1
14 Dravinja 7 7 17 -10 4
15 Dekani 8 6 4 +2 12
16 Krško 7 5 14 -9 5