The model missed the final outcome (Cukaricki win 0–2).
The model had projected Radnicki NIS at 62.3%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Radnicki NIS Cukaricki ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 2-1, 2-0, 1-1, 1-0, 3-1 0-2 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Radnicki NIS | 62.3% | 42.6% | +19.7 pp | Model Edge |
| Draw | 21.9% | 28.4% | -6.5 pp | Market Higher |
| Cukaricki | 15.8% | 29.0% | -13.2 pp | Market Higher |
The statistical model estimates Radnicki NIS's win probability at 62.3%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 42.6%, a difference of 19.7 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Cukaricki win 0–2.
Market Assessment
The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Radnicki NIS.
- The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (2 goals)
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Radnicki NIS by 19.7 percentage points (42.6% vs model 62.3%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Jul 25, 2026 · 22:17 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Radnicki NIS 62.2% · Draw 21.9% · Cukaricki 15.8%
- xG · Radnicki NIS 2.20 — Cukaricki 1.05
-
Jul 25, 2026 · 15:01 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Radnicki NIS 2.15 · Draw 3.23 · Cukaricki 3.16
- Implied 1X2 · Radnicki NIS 42.6% · Draw 28.4% · Cukaricki 29.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 25, 2026 · 15:30 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Radnicki NIS 2.15 · Draw 3.23 · Cukaricki 3.16
- Implied 1X2 · Radnicki NIS 42.6% · Draw 28.4% · Cukaricki 29.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 25, 2026 · 15:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Cukaricki win · 0–2
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (20 pp)
- High xG deviation from league baseline (63%+)
- Strong model lean
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotProbability Calibration
- Expected: 56.2%
- Historical Bucket: 55–60% — Building sample
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Radnicki NIS & Cukaricki!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Super Liga — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FK Crvena Zvezda | 10 | 9 | 1 | 0 | 28 |
| 2 | Vojvodina | 10 | 7 | 1 | 2 | 22 |
| 3 | Radnicki 1923 | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 |
| 4 | Mladost Lucani | 10 | 4 | 4 | 2 | 16 |
| 5 | IMT Novi Beograd | 10 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 15 |
| 6 | Železničar Pančevo | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| 7 | Radnik Surdulica | 10 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 14 |
| 8 | Novi Pazar | 10 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 13 |
| 9 | Cukaricki | 10 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 11 |
| 10 | OFK Beograd | 10 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 9 |
| 11 | FK Partizan | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 12 | Radnicki NIS | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 13 | Macva | 10 | 2 | 2 | 6 | 8 |
| 14 | Zemun | 10 | 0 | 3 | 7 | 3 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FK Crvena Zvezda | 10 | 24 | 3 | +21 | 28 |
| 2 | Vojvodina | 10 | 21 | 10 | +11 | 22 |
| 3 | Radnicki 1923 | 9 | 17 | 9 | +8 | 17 |
| 4 | FK Partizan | 9 | 17 | 19 | -2 | 8 |
| 5 | Železničar Pančevo | 9 | 14 | 10 | +4 | 14 |
| 6 | Radnik Surdulica | 10 | 14 | 15 | -1 | 14 |
| 7 | OFK Beograd | 10 | 13 | 21 | -8 | 9 |
| 8 | IMT Novi Beograd | 10 | 12 | 7 | +5 | 15 |
| 9 | Cukaricki | 10 | 12 | 18 | -6 | 11 |
| 10 | Novi Pazar | 10 | 10 | 11 | -1 | 13 |
| 11 | Mladost Lucani | 10 | 10 | 12 | -2 | 16 |
| 12 | Radnicki NIS | 9 | 6 | 11 | -5 | 8 |
| 13 | Macva | 10 | 6 | 17 | -11 | 8 |
| 14 | Zemun | 10 | 6 | 19 | -13 | 3 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vojvodina | 10 | 7.0 | 1.1 | +5.9 | 22 |
| 2 | FK Crvena Zvezda | 10 | 5.9 | 1.2 | +4.7 | 28 |
| 3 | Radnicki 1923 | 9 | 1.9 | 1.1 | +0.8 | 17 |
| 4 | FK Partizan | 9 | 3.7 | 3.1 | +0.6 | 8 |
| 5 | Cukaricki | 10 | 1.8 | 1.4 | +0.4 | 11 |
| 6 | Radnik Surdulica | 10 | 0.8 | 0.5 | +0.3 | 14 |
| 7 | Radnicki NIS | 9 | 1.1 | 0.9 | +0.2 | 8 |
| 8 | Železničar Pančevo | 9 | 0.9 | 1.1 | -0.2 | 14 |
| 9 | IMT Novi Beograd | 10 | 1.4 | 1.8 | -0.4 | 15 |
| 10 | Novi Pazar | 10 | 1.1 | 1.9 | -0.8 | 13 |
| 11 | OFK Beograd | 10 | 0.3 | 2.1 | -1.8 | 9 |
| 12 | Macva | 10 | 0.5 | 4.7 | -4.2 | 8 |
| 13 | Zemun | 10 | 1.9 | 7.4 | -5.5 | 3 |
| 14 | Mladost Lucani | 10 | — | — | — | 16 |