The model missed the final outcome (Jagiellonia win 1–2).
The model had projected Motor Lublin at 42.8%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Motor Lublin Jagiellonia ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 2-1, 1-1, 2-2, 1-2, 3-1 1-2 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Motor Lublin | 42.8% | 31.8% | +11.0 pp | Model Edge |
| Draw | 23.8% | 26.5% | -2.7 pp | Aligned |
| Jagiellonia | 33.4% | 41.7% | -8.3 pp | Market Higher |
The statistical model estimates Motor Lublin's win probability at 42.8%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 31.8%, a difference of 11.0 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Jagiellonia win 1–2.
Market Assessment
The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Motor Lublin.
- The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.97) — 3 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- 1X2: model leaned Motor Lublin; match finished Jagiellonia
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Motor Lublin by 11.0 percentage points (31.8% vs model 42.8%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Jul 31, 2026 · 19:20 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Motor Lublin 42.7% · Draw 23.8% · Jagiellonia 33.5%
- xG · Motor Lublin 2.21 — Jagiellonia 1.76
-
Jul 31, 2026 · 18:04 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Motor Lublin 3.03 · Draw 3.63 · Jagiellonia 2.31
- Implied 1X2 · Motor Lublin 31.8% · Draw 26.5% · Jagiellonia 41.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 31, 2026 · 18:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Motor Lublin 3.03 · Draw 3.63 · Jagiellonia 2.31
- Implied 1X2 · Motor Lublin 31.8% · Draw 26.5% · Jagiellonia 41.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 31, 2026 · 18:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Jagiellonia win · 1–2
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (11 pp)
- High xG deviation from league baseline (64%+)
- Statistical edge detected
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Motor Lublin & Jagiellonia!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Ekstraklasa — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gornik Zabrze | 9 | 7 | 1 | 1 | 22 |
| 2 | Legia Warszawa | 9 | 5 | 4 | 0 | 19 |
| 3 | Lech Poznan | 8 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 19 |
| 4 | Wisla Krakow | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 |
| 5 | Pogon Szczecin | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 15 |
| 6 | Korona Kielce | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 15 |
| 7 | Zaglebie Lubin | 9 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 15 |
| 8 | Piast Gliwice | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| 9 | GKS Katowice | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 12 |
| 10 | Jagiellonia | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 12 |
| 11 | Wisla Plock | 8 | 3 | 2 | 3 | 11 |
| 12 | Widzew Łódź | 9 | 1 | 6 | 2 | 9 |
| 13 | Cracovia Krakow | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 14 | Radomiak Radom | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 15 | Slask Wroclaw | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 16 | Motor Lublin | 9 | 1 | 3 | 5 | 6 |
| 17 | Wieczysta Kraków | 8 | 1 | 2 | 5 | 5 |
| 18 | Raków Częstochowa | 9 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 3 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Legia Warszawa | 9 | 19 | 8 | +11 | 19 |
| 2 | Lech Poznan | 8 | 17 | 7 | +10 | 19 |
| 3 | Wisla Krakow | 9 | 17 | 12 | +5 | 17 |
| 4 | Gornik Zabrze | 9 | 16 | 8 | +8 | 22 |
| 5 | GKS Katowice | 8 | 16 | 13 | +3 | 12 |
| 6 | Piast Gliwice | 9 | 16 | 15 | +1 | 13 |
| 7 | Widzew Łódź | 9 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 9 |
| 8 | Pogon Szczecin | 8 | 12 | 6 | +6 | 15 |
| 9 | Korona Kielce | 9 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 15 |
| 10 | Jagiellonia | 8 | 12 | 13 | -1 | 12 |
| 11 | Raków Częstochowa | 9 | 12 | 21 | -9 | 3 |
| 12 | Zaglebie Lubin | 9 | 11 | 10 | +1 | 15 |
| 13 | Slask Wroclaw | 9 | 11 | 15 | -4 | 6 |
| 14 | Wieczysta Kraków | 8 | 11 | 17 | -6 | 5 |
| 15 | Wisla Plock | 8 | 9 | 12 | -3 | 11 |
| 16 | Cracovia Krakow | 9 | 9 | 14 | -5 | 8 |
| 17 | Motor Lublin | 9 | 9 | 15 | -6 | 6 |
| 18 | Radomiak Radom | 9 | 7 | 20 | -13 | 8 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lech Poznan | 8 | 10.4 | 4.1 | +6.3 | 19 |
| 2 | Wisla Krakow | 9 | 12.0 | 7.9 | +4.1 | 17 |
| 3 | Legia Warszawa | 9 | 9.9 | 6.0 | +3.9 | 19 |
| 4 | Cracovia Krakow | 9 | 10.4 | 7.1 | +3.3 | 8 |
| 5 | Gornik Zabrze | 9 | 10.0 | 7.7 | +2.3 | 22 |
| 6 | Jagiellonia | 8 | 8.9 | 6.9 | +2.0 | 12 |
| 7 | Zaglebie Lubin | 9 | 8.4 | 8.2 | +0.2 | 15 |
| 8 | Widzew Łódź | 9 | 9.8 | 9.7 | +0.1 | 9 |
| 9 | Slask Wroclaw | 9 | 10.5 | 10.6 | -0.1 | 6 |
| 10 | Wieczysta Kraków | 8 | 9.1 | 9.6 | -0.5 | 5 |
| 11 | Motor Lublin | 9 | 8.7 | 9.2 | -0.5 | 6 |
| 12 | Pogon Szczecin | 8 | 8.1 | 8.9 | -0.8 | 15 |
| 13 | Wisla Plock | 8 | 9.6 | 10.8 | -1.2 | 11 |
| 14 | GKS Katowice | 8 | 8.8 | 10.6 | -1.8 | 12 |
| 15 | Korona Kielce | 9 | 5.4 | 8.7 | -3.3 | 15 |
| 16 | Piast Gliwice | 9 | 7.3 | 10.8 | -3.5 | 13 |
| 17 | Radomiak Radom | 9 | 7.4 | 11.2 | -3.8 | 8 |
| 18 | Raków Częstochowa | 9 | 9.9 | 16.5 | -6.6 | 3 |