AI correctly predicted the Jong AZ win.
The match finished 3–6, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (9 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Jong AZ Jong AZ ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-2, 0-1, 0-2, 2-1 3-6 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dordrecht | 24.0% | 42.2% | -18.2 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 24.7% | 23.9% | +0.8 pp | Aligned |
| Jong AZ | 51.3% | 33.9% | +17.4 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates Dordrecht's win probability at 42.2%, compared with the model's estimate of 24.0%, a difference of 18.2 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Jong AZ win 3–6).
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about Dordrecht than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.21) — 9 goals materialised
- Jong AZ attacking xG significantly stronger (1.93 vs 1.28)
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
What failed
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Jong AZ higher (69.5% vs model 51.3%, 18.2 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Jong AZ win 3–6).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Sep 05, 2026 · 14:29 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Dordrecht 24.0% · Draw 24.8% · Jong AZ 51.3%
- xG · Dordrecht 1.28 — Jong AZ 1.93
-
Sep 05, 2026 · 14:22 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Dordrecht 2.26 · Draw 3.98 · Jong AZ 2.81
- Implied 1X2 · Dordrecht 42.2% · Draw 23.9% · Jong AZ 33.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 05, 2026 · 14:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Dordrecht 2.26 · Draw 3.98 · Jong AZ 2.81
- Implied 1X2 · Dordrecht 42.2% · Draw 23.9% · Jong AZ 33.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 05, 2026 · 14:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Jong AZ win · 3–6
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (18 pp)
- Moderate model lean
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Dordrecht & Jong AZ!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Eerste Divisie — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heracles | 8 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 21 |
| 2 | Almere City FC | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 16 |
| 3 | MVV | 8 | 5 | 1 | 2 | 16 |
| 4 | VVV Venlo | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
| 5 | Roda | 8 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 15 |
| 6 | Emmen | 8 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 15 |
| 7 | Waalwijk | 8 | 3 | 4 | 1 | 13 |
| 8 | Vitesse | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 13 |
| 9 | NAC Breda | 8 | 4 | 1 | 3 | 13 |
| 10 | Jong AZ | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| 11 | FC Volendam | 8 | 4 | 0 | 4 | 12 |
| 12 | Jong PSV | 9 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 12 |
| 13 | FC Eindhoven | 8 | 3 | 1 | 4 | 10 |
| 14 | Helmond Sport | 8 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 8 |
| 15 | Jong Ajax | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 16 | Den Bosch | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| 17 | Dordrecht | 8 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 |
| 18 | Jong Utrecht | 9 | 2 | 1 | 6 | 7 |
| 19 | FC OSS | 8 | 2 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
| 20 | De Graafschap | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heracles | 8 | 26 | 10 | +16 | 21 |
| 2 | Jong AZ | 9 | 22 | 17 | +5 | 13 |
| 3 | VVV Venlo | 8 | 21 | 14 | +7 | 15 |
| 4 | FC Volendam | 8 | 20 | 16 | +4 | 12 |
| 5 | Almere City FC | 8 | 18 | 7 | +11 | 16 |
| 6 | Waalwijk | 8 | 18 | 11 | +7 | 13 |
| 7 | Emmen | 8 | 18 | 17 | +1 | 15 |
| 8 | NAC Breda | 8 | 17 | 17 | 0 | 13 |
| 9 | Jong Utrecht | 9 | 15 | 21 | -6 | 7 |
| 10 | Jong PSV | 9 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 12 |
| 11 | Vitesse | 8 | 13 | 11 | +2 | 13 |
| 12 | Helmond Sport | 8 | 13 | 14 | -1 | 8 |
| 13 | FC Eindhoven | 8 | 13 | 17 | -4 | 10 |
| 14 | Jong Ajax | 9 | 13 | 22 | -9 | 8 |
| 15 | MVV | 8 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 16 |
| 16 | Den Bosch | 7 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 7 |
| 17 | Dordrecht | 8 | 12 | 23 | -11 | 7 |
| 18 | Roda | 8 | 9 | 5 | +4 | 15 |
| 19 | FC OSS | 8 | 8 | 13 | -5 | 6 |
| 20 | De Graafschap | 7 | 8 | 20 | -12 | 4 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Volendam | 8 | 9.6 | 5.1 | +4.5 | 12 |
| 2 | Heracles | 8 | 10.1 | 6.0 | +4.1 | 21 |
| 3 | Emmen | 8 | 9.2 | 6.2 | +3.0 | 15 |
| 4 | NAC Breda | 8 | 9.8 | 6.9 | +2.9 | 13 |
| 5 | MVV | 8 | 6.7 | 3.8 | +2.9 | 16 |
| 6 | Jong PSV | 9 | 8.5 | 5.7 | +2.8 | 12 |
| 7 | Den Bosch | 7 | 9.6 | 7.0 | +2.6 | 7 |
| 8 | Vitesse | 8 | 8.0 | 6.8 | +1.2 | 13 |
| 9 | Jong AZ | 9 | 6.9 | 5.7 | +1.2 | 13 |
| 10 | Almere City FC | 8 | 7.2 | 6.1 | +1.1 | 16 |
| 11 | Roda | 8 | 8.1 | 7.2 | +0.9 | 15 |
| 12 | Waalwijk | 8 | 4.8 | 4.6 | +0.2 | 13 |
| 13 | FC OSS | 8 | 5.3 | 7.3 | -2.0 | 6 |
| 14 | De Graafschap | 7 | 5.4 | 7.6 | -2.2 | 4 |
| 15 | Jong Ajax | 9 | 8.4 | 10.8 | -2.4 | 8 |
| 16 | VVV Venlo | 8 | 5.7 | 8.9 | -3.2 | 15 |
| 17 | Helmond Sport | 8 | 2.6 | 6.2 | -3.6 | 8 |
| 18 | Jong Utrecht | 9 | 5.4 | 9.6 | -4.2 | 7 |
| 19 | FC Eindhoven | 8 | 3.9 | 8.2 | -4.3 | 10 |
| 20 | Dordrecht | 8 | 5.0 | 10.7 | -5.7 | 7 |