The model missed the final outcome (Jong AZ win 2–5).
The model had projected De Graafschap at 50.3%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (7 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 De Graafschap Jong AZ ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 2-1, 1-0, 2-0, 1-2 2-5 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| De Graafschap | 50.3% | 54.9% | -4.5 pp | Aligned |
| Draw | 25.4% | 19.2% | +6.2 pp | Model Higher |
| Jong AZ | 24.3% | 25.9% | -1.6 pp | Aligned |
The statistical model estimates Draw's win probability at 25.4%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 19.2%, a difference of 6.2 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Jong AZ win 2–5.
Market Assessment
The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Draw.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.11) — 7 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- 1X2: model leaned De Graafschap; match finished Jong AZ
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on De Graafschap by 6.2 percentage points (44.1% vs model 50.3%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Aug 17, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · De Graafschap 50.3% · Draw 25.4% · Jong AZ 24.3%
- xG · De Graafschap 1.86 — Jong AZ 1.25
-
Aug 17, 2026 · 17:30 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · De Graafschap 1.72 · Draw 4.93 · Jong AZ 3.69
- Implied 1X2 · De Graafschap 55.1% · Draw 19.2% · Jong AZ 25.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 17, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · De Graafschap 1.73 · Draw 4.94 · Jong AZ 3.66
- Implied 1X2 · De Graafschap 54.9% · Draw 19.2% · Jong AZ 25.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 17, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Jong AZ win · 2–5
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- Moderate model lean
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for De Graafschap & Jong AZ!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Eerste Divisie — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heracles | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 18 |
| 2 | Almere City FC | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 |
| 3 | MVV | 6 | 4 | 1 | 1 | 13 |
| 4 | VVV Venlo | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 |
| 5 | Emmen | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 12 |
| 6 | Roda | 6 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 11 |
| 7 | Jong PSV | 7 | 3 | 2 | 2 | 11 |
| 8 | Waalwijk | 6 | 2 | 4 | 0 | 10 |
| 9 | Vitesse | 6 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 10 |
| 10 | FC Volendam | 6 | 3 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| 11 | Jong AZ | 7 | 3 | 0 | 4 | 9 |
| 12 | Helmond Sport | 6 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 8 |
| 13 | NAC Breda | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 14 | FC Eindhoven | 6 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 7 |
| 15 | Jong Ajax | 7 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 7 |
| 16 | Den Bosch | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 17 | Dordrecht | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 18 | De Graafschap | 6 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 4 |
| 19 | Jong Utrecht | 7 | 1 | 1 | 5 | 4 |
| 20 | FC OSS | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 3 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Heracles | 6 | 24 | 9 | +15 | 18 |
| 2 | Jong AZ | 7 | 17 | 15 | +2 | 9 |
| 3 | VVV Venlo | 6 | 16 | 10 | +6 | 12 |
| 4 | FC Volendam | 6 | 16 | 10 | +6 | 9 |
| 5 | Emmen | 6 | 16 | 14 | +2 | 12 |
| 6 | Almere City FC | 6 | 15 | 4 | +11 | 13 |
| 7 | Waalwijk | 6 | 12 | 8 | +4 | 10 |
| 8 | Helmond Sport | 6 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 8 |
| 9 | Jong PSV | 7 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 11 |
| 10 | Jong Ajax | 7 | 12 | 16 | -4 | 7 |
| 11 | NAC Breda | 6 | 11 | 14 | -3 | 7 |
| 12 | Vitesse | 6 | 10 | 8 | +2 | 10 |
| 13 | Den Bosch | 6 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 4 |
| 14 | MVV | 6 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 13 |
| 15 | Dordrecht | 6 | 9 | 18 | -9 | 4 |
| 16 | FC Eindhoven | 6 | 8 | 12 | -4 | 7 |
| 17 | Jong Utrecht | 7 | 8 | 17 | -9 | 4 |
| 18 | Roda | 6 | 7 | 5 | +2 | 11 |
| 19 | De Graafschap | 6 | 7 | 18 | -11 | 4 |
| 20 | FC OSS | 6 | 5 | 12 | -7 | 3 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | FC Volendam | 6 | 9.6 | 5.1 | +4.5 | 9 |
| 2 | Heracles | 6 | 10.1 | 6.0 | +4.1 | 18 |
| 3 | Emmen | 6 | 9.2 | 6.2 | +3.0 | 12 |
| 4 | NAC Breda | 6 | 9.8 | 6.9 | +2.9 | 7 |
| 5 | MVV | 6 | 6.7 | 3.8 | +2.9 | 13 |
| 6 | Jong PSV | 7 | 8.5 | 5.7 | +2.8 | 11 |
| 7 | Den Bosch | 6 | 9.6 | 7.0 | +2.6 | 4 |
| 8 | Vitesse | 6 | 8.0 | 6.8 | +1.2 | 10 |
| 9 | Jong AZ | 7 | 6.9 | 5.7 | +1.2 | 9 |
| 10 | Almere City FC | 6 | 7.2 | 6.1 | +1.1 | 13 |
| 11 | Roda | 6 | 8.1 | 7.2 | +0.9 | 11 |
| 12 | Waalwijk | 6 | 4.8 | 4.6 | +0.2 | 10 |
| 13 | FC OSS | 6 | 5.3 | 7.3 | -2.0 | 3 |
| 14 | De Graafschap | 6 | 5.4 | 7.6 | -2.2 | 4 |
| 15 | Jong Ajax | 7 | 8.4 | 10.8 | -2.4 | 7 |
| 16 | VVV Venlo | 6 | 5.7 | 8.9 | -3.2 | 12 |
| 17 | Helmond Sport | 6 | 2.6 | 6.2 | -3.6 | 8 |
| 18 | Jong Utrecht | 7 | 5.4 | 9.6 | -4.2 | 4 |
| 19 | FC Eindhoven | 6 | 3.9 | 8.2 | -4.3 | 7 |
| 20 | Dordrecht | 6 | 5.0 | 10.7 | -5.7 | 4 |