AI correctly predicted the Club Tijuana win.
The match finished 3–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Club Tijuana Club Tijuana ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 2-0, 1-0, 3-0, 2-1, 1-1 3-1 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Club Tijuana | 72.2% | 25.9% | +46.2 pp | Model Edge |
| Draw | 19.4% | 27.8% | -8.4 pp | Market Higher |
| Tigres UANL | 8.4% | 46.3% | -37.8 pp | Market Higher |
The statistical model estimates Club Tijuana's win probability at 72.2%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 25.9%, a difference of 46.2 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Club Tijuana win 3–1).
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.89) — 4 goals materialised
- Club Tijuana attacking xG significantly stronger (2.23 vs 0.66)
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Club Tijuana more conservatively (26.0% vs model 72.2%, 46.2 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Club Tijuana win 3–1).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Jul 17, 2026 · 19:13 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Club Tijuana 72.1% · Draw 19.5% · Tigres UANL 8.4%
- xG · Club Tijuana 2.23 — Tigres UANL 0.66
-
Jul 17, 2026 · 02:39 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Club Tijuana 3.67 · Draw 3.46 · Tigres UANL 2.09
- Implied 1X2 · Club Tijuana 26.2% · Draw 27.8% · Tigres UANL 46.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 17, 2026 · 03:09 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Club Tijuana 3.71 · Draw 3.46 · Tigres UANL 2.08
- Implied 1X2 · Club Tijuana 25.9% · Draw 27.8% · Tigres UANL 46.3%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 17, 2026 · 03:10 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Club Tijuana win · 3–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Fail
- Large market gap (46 pp)
- High xG deviation from league baseline (65%+)
- Strong model lean
- Market strongly disagrees on price
- Validation failed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Club Tijuana & Tigres UANL!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Liga MX — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Toluca | 10 | 6 | 2 | 2 | 20 |
| 2 | Guadalajara Chivas | 10 | 5 | 3 | 2 | 18 |
| 3 | Club America | 8 | 5 | 2 | 1 | 17 |
| 4 | Club Queretaro | 9 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 17 |
| 5 | Atlas | 10 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 17 |
| 6 | Cruz Azul | 10 | 5 | 1 | 4 | 16 |
| 7 | Leon | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| 8 | Club Tijuana | 9 | 4 | 2 | 3 | 14 |
| 9 | Puebla | 10 | 4 | 2 | 4 | 14 |
| 10 | Monterrey | 9 | 4 | 1 | 4 | 13 |
| 11 | Pachuca | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 |
| 12 | U.N.A.M. - Pumas | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 |
| 13 | Atletico San Luis | 10 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 12 |
| 14 | Atlante FC | 10 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 11 |
| 15 | Tigres UANL | 10 | 2 | 4 | 4 | 10 |
| 16 | Santos Laguna | 10 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 10 |
| 17 | Necaxa | 9 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
| 18 | FC Juarez | 9 | 1 | 0 | 8 | 3 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Toluca | 10 | 23 | 12 | +11 | 20 |
| 2 | Cruz Azul | 10 | 19 | 18 | +1 | 16 |
| 3 | Club America | 8 | 17 | 8 | +9 | 17 |
| 4 | Guadalajara Chivas | 10 | 17 | 10 | +7 | 18 |
| 5 | Monterrey | 9 | 16 | 14 | +2 | 13 |
| 6 | Atlas | 10 | 16 | 17 | -1 | 17 |
| 7 | Pachuca | 10 | 15 | 11 | +4 | 12 |
| 8 | Club Tijuana | 9 | 14 | 13 | +1 | 14 |
| 9 | U.N.A.M. - Pumas | 10 | 14 | 16 | -2 | 12 |
| 10 | Atletico San Luis | 10 | 14 | 18 | -4 | 12 |
| 11 | Club Queretaro | 9 | 13 | 8 | +5 | 17 |
| 12 | Leon | 9 | 12 | 10 | +2 | 14 |
| 13 | Atlante FC | 10 | 12 | 15 | -3 | 11 |
| 14 | Puebla | 10 | 11 | 12 | -1 | 14 |
| 15 | Tigres UANL | 10 | 10 | 13 | -3 | 10 |
| 16 | Santos Laguna | 10 | 10 | 15 | -5 | 10 |
| 17 | Necaxa | 9 | 10 | 16 | -6 | 8 |
| 18 | FC Juarez | 9 | 6 | 23 | -17 | 3 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Club Tijuana | 9 | 8.2 | 3.2 | +5.0 | 14 |
| 2 | Cruz Azul | 10 | 11.3 | 7.5 | +3.8 | 16 |
| 3 | Monterrey | 9 | 9.8 | 6.2 | +3.6 | 13 |
| 4 | Club America | 8 | 9.7 | 6.1 | +3.6 | 17 |
| 5 | Toluca | 10 | 8.9 | 6.1 | +2.8 | 20 |
| 6 | Tigres UANL | 10 | 9.7 | 7.3 | +2.4 | 10 |
| 7 | Guadalajara Chivas | 10 | 8.1 | 5.8 | +2.3 | 18 |
| 8 | Necaxa | 9 | 6.8 | 6.1 | +0.7 | 8 |
| 9 | Santos Laguna | 10 | 10.1 | 9.7 | +0.4 | 10 |
| 10 | Club Queretaro | 9 | 8.6 | 8.8 | -0.2 | 17 |
| 11 | Leon | 9 | 8.7 | 9.4 | -0.7 | 14 |
| 12 | Puebla | 10 | 7.3 | 8.9 | -1.6 | 14 |
| 13 | U.N.A.M. - Pumas | 10 | 6.4 | 8.0 | -1.6 | 12 |
| 14 | Pachuca | 10 | 7.4 | 9.2 | -1.8 | 12 |
| 15 | Atlas | 10 | 6.6 | 9.5 | -2.9 | 17 |
| 16 | Atletico San Luis | 10 | 7.8 | 11.1 | -3.3 | 12 |
| 17 | Atlante FC | 10 | 6.3 | 10.1 | -3.8 | 11 |
| 18 | FC Juarez | 9 | 4.7 | 13.4 | -8.7 | 3 |