Prediction Audit: Rodez vs Nimes Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Jul 22, 2026 - 16:00
2 1.32
1 1.28
xG Accuracy: 77%

AI correctly predicted the Rodez win.

The match finished 2–1, validating the model's directional assessment.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade B-

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Rodez Rodez ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 2-1 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Rodez higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Rodez -35.0 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Rodez 36.1% 71.2% -35.0 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.6% 18.8% +10.8 pp Model Edge
Nimes 34.2% 10.0% +24.2 pp Model Edge

The closing market estimates Rodez's win probability at 71.2%, compared with the model's estimate of 36.1%, a difference of 35.0 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Rodez win 2–1).

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
  • Exact score 2–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)

Market lesson

Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Rodez higher (71.1% vs model 36.1%, 35.0 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Rodez win 2–1).

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Jul 22, 2026 · 19:33 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Rodez 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Nimes 34.2%
    • xG · Rodez 1.32 — Nimes 1.28
  2. Jul 22, 2026 · 15:30 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Rodez 1.31 · Draw 4.95 · Nimes 9.30
    • Implied 1X2 · Rodez 71.2% · Draw 18.8% · Nimes 10.0%
    • Bookmaker · Marathonbet
  3. Jul 22, 2026 · 15:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Rodez 1.31 · Draw 4.95 · Nimes 9.30
    • Implied 1X2 · Rodez 71.2% · Draw 18.8% · Nimes 10.0%
    • Bookmaker · Marathonbet
  4. Jul 22, 2026 · 16:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Rodez win · 2–1
  6. FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Validated
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 31/100 · Low
  • Validation: Fail
  • Large market gap (35 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Market strongly disagrees on price
  • Validation failed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Monitoring Confidence 9/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 26, 2026 · 18:29 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1912164

Closing Odds 1.31
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Rodez win · Rodez 2–1 Nimes
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Model favours Rodez; market prices Rodez instead — inputs may be missing or stale.

  • Model: Rodez 1.32 xG vs Nimes 1.28 → Rodez 36.1%
  • Market: Rodez ~71.2% implied
  • Validation failed — do not treat 1X2 EV as actionable.

Do not act on 1X2 value until validation passes. Structural leans (O/U, BTTS) need separate odds review.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Rodez & Nimes!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions