Prediction Audit: Rennes vs Guingamp Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Jul 17, 2026 - 15:30
3 1.26
1 1.34
xG Accuracy: 56%

The model missed the final outcome (Rennes win 3–1).

The model had projected Guingamp at 37.1%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Guingamp Rennes ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 3-1 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Rennes higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Rennes -21.1 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Rennes 33.3% 54.4% -21.1 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.6% 24.0% +5.7 pp Model Higher
Guingamp 37.1% 21.6% +15.4 pp Model Edge

The closing market estimates Rennes's win probability at 54.4%, compared with the model's estimate of 33.3%, a difference of 21.1 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Rennes win 3–1.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 4 goals materialised
  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result

What failed

  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (4 goals)
  • 1X2: model leaned Guingamp; match finished Rennes

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Guingamp by 21.1 percentage points (58.2% vs model 37.1%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Jul 17, 2026 · 19:32 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Rennes 33.4% · Draw 29.6% · Guingamp 37.0%
    • xG · Rennes 1.26 — Guingamp 1.34
  2. Jul 17, 2026 · 15:01 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Rennes 1.63 · Draw 3.70 · Guingamp 4.10
    • Implied 1X2 · Rennes 54.4% · Draw 24.0% · Guingamp 21.6%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Jul 17, 2026 · 15:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Rennes 1.63 · Draw 3.70 · Guingamp 4.10
    • Implied 1X2 · Rennes 54.4% · Draw 24.0% · Guingamp 21.6%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Jul 17, 2026 · 15:30 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Rennes win · 3–1
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 52/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (21 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Pricing remains divergent
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Monitoring Confidence 14/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 26, 2026 · 00:08 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1776701

Closing Odds 1.63
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Rennes win · Rennes 3–1 Guingamp
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: Club Friendlies
  • Fixture: Rennes vs EA Guingamp
  • Kickoff: 2026-07-17 15:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 0.0% · Draw 50.0% · Away 50.0%
  • xG (showing): Rennes 1.26 — EA Guingamp 1.34 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): See the Over/Under and BTTS cards for any directional lean text.
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Rennes & Guingamp!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions