Predictions / Football / Kuwait. Division 1 / Yarmouk vs Al Sulaibikhat

Prediction Audit: Yarmouk vs Al Sulaibikhat Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Aug 14, 2026 - 17:25
1 1.28
1 1.51
xG Accuracy: 80%

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 1–1).

The model had projected Al Sulaibikhat at 38.2%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Al Sulaibikhat Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-2, 1-0, 2-1 1-1 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Moderate Disagreement

The model rates Al Sulaibikhat considerably stronger than the closing betting market.

Largest probability gap: Al Sulaibikhat +6.0 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Yarmouk 33.0% 37.8% -4.8 pp Aligned
Draw 28.8% 30.0% -1.2 pp Aligned
Al Sulaibikhat 38.2% 32.2% +6.0 pp Model Higher

The statistical model estimates Al Sulaibikhat's win probability at 38.2%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 32.2%, a difference of 6.0 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Draw 1–1.

Market Assessment

The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Al Sulaibikhat.

  • Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
  • Exact score 1–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (2 goals)
  • 1X2: model leaned Al Sulaibikhat; match finished Draw

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Al Sulaibikhat by 6.0 percentage points (32.2% vs model 38.2%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Aug 14, 2026 · 19:22 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Yarmouk 33.0% · Draw 28.8% · Al Sulaibikhat 38.2%
    • xG · Yarmouk 1.28 — Al Sulaibikhat 1.51
  2. Aug 14, 2026 · 16:59 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Yarmouk 2.35 · Draw 2.96 · Al Sulaibikhat 2.76
    • Implied 1X2 · Yarmouk 37.8% · Draw 30.0% · Al Sulaibikhat 32.2%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Aug 14, 2026 · 17:24 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Yarmouk 2.35 · Draw 2.96 · Al Sulaibikhat 2.76
    • Implied 1X2 · Yarmouk 37.8% · Draw 30.0% · Al Sulaibikhat 32.2%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Aug 14, 2026 · 17:25 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 1–1
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Monitor
Historical Decision Monitor
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 76/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 24/100
Monitoring Confidence 34/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 07, 2026 · 01:49 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3152972

Closing Odds 2.76
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · Yarmouk 1–1 Al Sulaibikhat
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: Division 1
  • Fixture: Yarmouk vs Al Sulaibikhat
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-14 17:25:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 33.0% · Draw 28.8% · Away 38.2%
  • xG (showing): Yarmouk 1.28 — Al Sulaibikhat 1.51 (total xG ≈ 2.79)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV on tracked lines at current best prices (same as the decision block: no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 47.2% · Over 2.5 52.8%); BTTS Yes (Yes 57.8% · No 42.2%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 57.8% · No 42.2%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (11.9%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Monitor

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Yarmouk & Al Sulaibikhat!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Division 1 Division 1 — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Al Sulaibikhat 21 13 5 3 44
2 Al Sahel 21 13 5 3 44
3 Yarmouk 21 13 4 4 43
4 Al Jazira 21 11 5 5 38
5 Khaitan 21 7 6 8 27
6 Burgan 21 5 8 8 23
7 Shamiya 21 3 1 17 10
8 Sporty 21 2 0 19 6
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Yarmouk 21 42 20 +22 43
2 Al Jazira 21 41 24 +17 38
3 Al Sulaibikhat 21 38 16 +22 44
4 Al Sahel 21 35 16 +19 44
5 Burgan 21 26 30 -4 23
6 Khaitan 21 23 20 +3 27
7 Shamiya 21 19 63 -44 10
8 Sporty 21 14 49 -35 6