The model missed the final outcome (Draw 0–0).
The model had projected Ibrachina U20 at 42.4%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (0 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Ibrachina U20 Draw ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-2, 1-0, 0-2 0-0 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| XV de Piracicaba U20 | 28.4% | 20.3% | +8.0 pp | Model Higher |
| Draw | 29.3% | 25.9% | +3.3 pp | Aligned |
| Ibrachina U20 | 42.4% | 53.7% | -11.4 pp | Market Higher |
The closing market estimates Ibrachina U20's win probability at 53.7%, compared with the model's estimate of 42.4%, a difference of 11.4 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE5.
After full time, the result was Draw 0–0.
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about Ibrachina U20 than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- 1X2: model leaned Ibrachina U20; match finished Draw
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Ibrachina U20 by 11.4 percentage points (53.8% vs model 42.4%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Sep 04, 2026 · 17:56 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · XV de Piracicaba U20 28.4% · Draw 29.2% · Ibrachina U20 42.4%
- xG · XV de Piracicaba U20 1.15 — Ibrachina U20 1.45
-
Sep 04, 2026 · 17:31 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · XV de Piracicaba U20 4.36 · Draw 3.42 · Ibrachina U20 1.65
- Implied 1X2 · XV de Piracicaba U20 20.3% · Draw 25.9% · Ibrachina U20 53.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 04, 2026 · 17:56 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE5
- 1X2 odds · XV de Piracicaba U20 4.36 · Draw 3.42 · Ibrachina U20 1.65
- Implied 1X2 · XV de Piracicaba U20 20.3% · Draw 25.9% · Ibrachina U20 53.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 04, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Draw · 0–0
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (11 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for XV de Piracicaba U20 & Ibrachina U20!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Paulista - U20 — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Juventus U20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 2 | Santos U20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 3 | Ferroviária U20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 4 | Portuguesa Santista U20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 5 | Portuguesa U20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 6 | Corinthians U20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 7 | União Suzano U20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| 8 | Ponte Preta U20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 9 | Jabaquara U20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 10 | São Bento U20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 11 | Mirassol U20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 12 | Itapirense U20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 13 | América-SP U20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| 14 | Sertãozinho U20 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Juventus U20 | 1 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 3 |
| 2 | Santos U20 | 1 | 3 | 0 | +3 | 3 |
| 3 | Ferroviária U20 | 1 | 2 | 0 | +2 | 3 |
| 4 | Portuguesa Santista U20 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 |
| 5 | Portuguesa U20 | 1 | 2 | 1 | +1 | 3 |
| 6 | Corinthians U20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 7 | União Suzano U20 | 1 | 1 | 0 | +1 | 3 |
| 8 | Ponte Preta U20 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 9 | Jabaquara U20 | 1 | 1 | 2 | -1 | 0 |
| 10 | São Bento U20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 11 | Mirassol U20 | 1 | 0 | 1 | -1 | 0 |
| 12 | Itapirense U20 | 1 | 0 | 2 | -2 | 0 |
| 13 | América-SP U20 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
| 14 | Sertãozinho U20 | 1 | 0 | 3 | -3 | 0 |
