Prediction Audit: Tver vs Cherepovets Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Aug 02, 2026 - 14:00
5 1.22
0 1.38
xG Accuracy: 24%

The model missed the final outcome (Tver win 5–0).

The model had projected Cherepovets at 39.0%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (5 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Cherepovets Tver ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 5-0 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Moderate Disagreement

The model rates Cherepovets considerably stronger than the closing betting market.

Largest probability gap: Cherepovets +7.7 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Tver 31.5% 37.4% -5.9 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.5% 31.3% -1.8 pp Aligned
Cherepovets 39.0% 31.3% +7.7 pp Model Higher

The statistical model estimates Cherepovets's win probability at 39.0%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 31.3%, a difference of 7.7 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Tver win 5–0.

Market Assessment

The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Cherepovets.

  • Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 5 goals materialised

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (5 goals)

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Cherepovets by 7.7 percentage points (31.3% vs model 39.0%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Aug 02, 2026 · 14:00 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Tver 31.5% · Draw 29.5% · Cherepovets 39.0%
    • xG · Tver 1.22 — Cherepovets 1.38
  2. Aug 02, 2026 · 13:31 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Tver 2.41 · Draw 2.88 · Cherepovets 2.88
    • Implied 1X2 · Tver 37.4% · Draw 31.3% · Cherepovets 31.3%
    • Bookmaker · Marathonbet
  3. Aug 02, 2026 · 14:00 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Tver 2.41 · Draw 2.88 · Cherepovets 2.88
    • Implied 1X2 · Tver 37.4% · Draw 31.3% · Cherepovets 31.3%
    • Bookmaker · Marathonbet
  4. Aug 02, 2026 · 14:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Tver win · 5–0
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Monitor
Historical Decision Monitor
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 75/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 21/100
Monitoring Confidence 33/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 27, 2026 · 07:26 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1976621

Closing Odds 2.88
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Tver win · Tver 5–0 Cherepovets
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Second League - Group 2
  • Fixture: Tver vs Cherepovets
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-02 14:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 31.5% · Draw 29.5% · Away 39.0%
  • xG (showing): Tver 1.22 — Cherepovets 1.38 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV on tracked lines at current best prices (same as the decision block: no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Monitor

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Tver & Cherepovets!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Second League - Group 2 Second League - Group 2 — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Murom 21 14 2 5 44
1 Sevastopol 14 10 2 2 32
2 Dinamo St. Petersburg 20 12 6 2 42
2 Shahter Taganrog 14 9 3 2 30
3 Luki-Energiya 21 12 6 3 42
3 Rostov II 14 9 2 3 29
4 Baltika II 21 12 4 5 40
4 Nart Cherkessk 14 7 3 4 24
5 Chertanovo Moscow 21 11 6 4 39
5 Kyzyltash 14 7 2 5 23
6 Torpedo Vladimir 20 9 5 6 32
6 Spartak Nalchik 14 6 5 3 23
7 Kosmos Dolgoprudny 21 8 4 9 28
7 Druzhba 14 6 4 4 22
8 Tver 21 7 3 11 24
8 Pobeda 14 6 3 5 21
9 Cherepovets 20 7 3 10 24
9 Rubin Yalta 14 5 5 4 20
10 Zvezda St. Petersburg 20 5 9 6 24
10 Lugansk 14 4 3 7 15
11 Dinamo Vologda 20 6 5 9 23
11 Izberbash 14 5 0 9 15
12 Spartak Moscow 2 21 6 5 10 23
12 Angust Nazran 14 4 1 9 13
13 Yenisey II 21 5 4 12 19
13 Astrakhan 14 3 3 8 12
14 Iskra Smolensk 21 3 6 12 15
14 Dynamo Makhachkala II 14 2 3 9 9
15 Irkutsk 21 3 2 16 11
15 FK Chayka 2 14 2 1 11 7
16 PSK Dinskaya 0 0 0 0 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Baltika II 21 42 23 +19 40
2 Chertanovo Moscow 21 39 18 +21 39
3 Luki-Energiya 21 36 18 +18 42
4 Murom 21 35 17 +18 44
5 Dinamo St. Petersburg 20 32 10 +22 42
6 Tver 21 30 36 -6 24
7 Zvezda St. Petersburg 20 29 29 0 24
8 Rostov II 14 28 14 +14 29
9 Dinamo Vologda 20 28 25 +3 23
10 Pobeda 14 26 16 +10 21
11 Torpedo Vladimir 20 25 20 +5 32
12 Shahter Taganrog 14 24 9 +15 30
13 Kosmos Dolgoprudny 21 24 30 -6 28
14 Sevastopol 14 23 9 +14 32
15 Yenisey II 21 23 40 -17 19
16 Kyzyltash 14 22 17 +5 23
17 Spartak Nalchik 14 21 10 +11 23
18 Spartak Moscow 2 21 21 27 -6 23
19 Cherepovets 20 21 32 -11 24
20 Nart Cherkessk 14 19 10 +9 24
21 Iskra Smolensk 21 19 44 -25 15
22 Rubin Yalta 14 17 13 +4 20
23 Druzhba 14 17 14 +3 22
24 Lugansk 14 15 22 -7 15
25 Izberbash 14 13 36 -23 15
26 Astrakhan 14 12 20 -8 12
27 Irkutsk 21 11 46 -35 11
28 Dynamo Makhachkala II 14 10 26 -16 9
29 FK Chayka 2 14 10 32 -22 7
30 Angust Nazran 14 7 16 -9 13
31 PSK Dinskaya 0 0 0 0 0
Second League - Group 2 Russia. Second League - Group 2 Predictions