Prediction Audit: Åsane W vs Start W Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Sep 27, 2026 - 11:00
0 1.37
0 1.23
xG Accuracy: 49%

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 0–0).

The model had projected Åsane W at 38.5%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade C

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (0 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Åsane W Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 0-0 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Broadly Aligned

The model and closing market are broadly aligned.

Largest probability gap: Draw +4.8 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Åsane W 38.5% 38.8% -0.3 pp Aligned
Draw 29.6% 24.8% +4.8 pp Aligned
Start W 31.9% 36.4% -4.5 pp Aligned

The model and closing market are broadly aligned, with probability differences below 5 percentage points.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Draw 0–0.

Market Assessment

The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.

  • Current pricing remains close to the model baseline.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Both Teams To Score (No) matched the full-time result
  • Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile

What failed

  • 1X2: model leaned Åsane W; match finished Draw
  • Exact score: outside the model's top score bins

Market lesson

The full-time result was Draw 0–0, which did not match the model's pre-match lean on 1X2.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Sep 27, 2026 · 11:01 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Åsane W 38.5% · Draw 29.6% · Start W 31.9%
    • xG · Åsane W 1.37 — Start W 1.23
  2. Sep 27, 2026 · 10:31 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Åsane W 2.30 · Draw 3.60 · Start W 2.45
    • Implied 1X2 · Åsane W 38.8% · Draw 24.8% · Start W 36.4%
    • Bookmaker · Bet365
  3. Sep 27, 2026 · 11:01 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Åsane W 2.30 · Draw 3.60 · Start W 2.45
    • Implied 1X2 · Åsane W 38.8% · Draw 24.8% · Start W 36.4%
    • Bookmaker · Bet365
  4. Sep 27, 2026 · 11:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 0–0
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe
Historical Decision No Primary Bet
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 77/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Market Compatibility 76/100
Betting Confidence 80/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 21, 2026 · 01:06 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-10085122

Closing Odds 3.6
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · Åsane W 0–0 Start W
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade C

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: 1. Division Women
  • Fixture: Åsane W vs Start W
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-27 11:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 38.5% · Draw 29.6% · Away 31.9%
  • xG (showing): Åsane W 1.37 — Start W 1.23 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 51.8% · Implied: 45.4% · Probability edge: +6.4 pts · Est. EV: +8.8%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Totals and BTTS are evaluated against current market prices where available.

Early match state can move realised goals away from pre-kick projections.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Åsane W & Start W!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
1. Division Women 1. Division Women — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Start W 8 6 2 0 20
2 Viking FK 8 6 1 1 19
3 Åsane W 8 5 3 0 18
4 TIL 2020 W 8 5 2 1 17
5 Arna-Bjørnar W 8 4 2 2 14
6 Bryne W 8 3 2 3 11
7 Odd 8 2 3 3 9
8 Kolbotn W 8 2 2 4 8
9 Grei 8 2 1 5 7
10 Klepp W 8 2 0 6 6
11 Frigg Oslo FK W 8 1 0 7 3
12 Fyllingsdalen W 8 1 0 7 3
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Viking FK 8 25 7 +18 19
2 TIL 2020 W 8 19 5 +14 17
3 Åsane W 8 17 6 +11 18
4 Start W 8 17 8 +9 20
5 Grei 8 16 18 -2 7
6 Arna-Bjørnar W 8 13 9 +4 14
7 Kolbotn W 8 11 12 -1 8
8 Klepp W 8 11 26 -15 6
9 Odd 8 9 10 -1 9
10 Fyllingsdalen W 8 9 27 -18 3
11 Bryne W 8 7 9 -2 11
12 Frigg Oslo FK W 8 4 21 -17 3