The model missed the final outcome (Guangxi Hengchen win 2–4).
The model had projected Ningbo Professional at 36.1%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (6 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Ningbo Professional Guangxi Hengchen ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 2-4 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ningbo Professional | 36.1% | 31.0% | +5.2 pp | Model Higher |
| Draw | 29.6% | 27.4% | +2.2 pp | Aligned |
| Guangxi Hengchen | 34.2% | 41.6% | -7.4 pp | Market Higher |
The closing market estimates Guangxi Hengchen's win probability at 41.6%, compared with the model's estimate of 34.2%, a difference of 7.4 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Guangxi Hengchen win 2–4.
Market Assessment
The market and model broadly agree on Guangxi Hengchen. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 6 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (6 goals)
- 1X2: model leaned Ningbo Professional; match finished Guangxi Hengchen
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Ningbo Professional by 7.4 percentage points (43.5% vs model 36.1%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Aug 01, 2026 · 11:01 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Ningbo Professional 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Guangxi Hengchen 34.2%
- xG · Ningbo Professional 1.32 — Guangxi Hengchen 1.28
-
Aug 01, 2026 · 10:32 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Ningbo Professional 3.00 · Draw 3.39 · Guangxi Hengchen 2.23
- Implied 1X2 · Ningbo Professional 31.0% · Draw 27.4% · Guangxi Hengchen 41.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 01, 2026 · 11:01 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Ningbo Professional 3.00 · Draw 3.39 · Guangxi Hengchen 2.23
- Implied 1X2 · Ningbo Professional 31.0% · Draw 27.4% · Guangxi Hengchen 41.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 01, 2026 · 11:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Guangxi Hengchen win · 2–4
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Ningbo Professional & Guangxi Hengchen!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
League One — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou E-Power | 24 | 16 | 6 | 2 | 54 |
| 2 | Guangxi Hengchen | 24 | 13 | 6 | 5 | 45 |
| 3 | Shenzhen Juniors | 24 | 12 | 8 | 4 | 44 |
| 4 | Nantong Zhiyun | 23 | 10 | 9 | 4 | 39 |
| 5 | Yanbian Longding | 24 | 9 | 8 | 7 | 35 |
| 6 | Shaanxi Union | 23 | 9 | 6 | 8 | 33 |
| 7 | Hebei Kungfu | 24 | 8 | 7 | 9 | 31 |
| 8 | Wuxi Wugou | 23 | 8 | 5 | 10 | 29 |
| 9 | Changchun Yatai | 23 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 29 |
| 10 | Ningbo Professional | 23 | 9 | 5 | 9 | 29 |
| 11 | Dalian Huayi | 23 | 7 | 8 | 8 | 29 |
| 12 | Suzhou Dongwu | 24 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 26 |
| 13 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 24 | 4 | 11 | 9 | 23 |
| 14 | Nanjing City | 24 | 5 | 6 | 13 | 21 |
| 15 | Meizhou Kejia | 24 | 7 | 3 | 14 | 15 |
| 16 | Dongguan United | 24 | 2 | 7 | 15 | 13 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Guangzhou E-Power | 24 | 48 | 20 | +28 | 54 |
| 2 | Guangxi Hengchen | 24 | 40 | 26 | +14 | 45 |
| 3 | Shenzhen Juniors | 24 | 39 | 25 | +14 | 44 |
| 4 | Changchun Yatai | 23 | 37 | 38 | -1 | 29 |
| 5 | Shaanxi Union | 23 | 35 | 26 | +9 | 33 |
| 6 | Wuxi Wugou | 23 | 35 | 29 | +6 | 29 |
| 7 | Heilongjiang Lava Spring | 24 | 35 | 46 | -11 | 23 |
| 8 | Yanbian Longding | 24 | 33 | 27 | +6 | 35 |
| 9 | Nantong Zhiyun | 23 | 31 | 20 | +11 | 39 |
| 10 | Dalian Huayi | 23 | 30 | 33 | -3 | 29 |
| 11 | Suzhou Dongwu | 24 | 28 | 33 | -5 | 26 |
| 12 | Ningbo Professional | 23 | 27 | 29 | -2 | 29 |
| 13 | Meizhou Kejia | 24 | 25 | 50 | -25 | 15 |
| 14 | Dongguan United | 24 | 24 | 49 | -25 | 13 |
| 15 | Hebei Kungfu | 24 | 22 | 25 | -3 | 31 |
| 16 | Nanjing City | 24 | 20 | 33 | -13 | 21 |