Prediction Audit: Brusque vs Inter De Limeira Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Brusque

Aug 15, 2026 - 22:30

3 1.35

2 1.25

xG Accuracy: 52%

Inter De Limeira

AI correctly predicted the Brusque win.

The match finished 3–2, validating the model's directional assessment.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade B-

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (5 goals) ✖ Incorrect
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
1X2 Brusque Brusque ✔ Correct
Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 3-2 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Outcome	Model	Closing Market	Difference	Signal
Brusque	37.5%	43.6%	-6.0 pp	Market Higher
Draw	29.6%	33.4%	-3.8 pp	Aligned
Inter De Limeira	32.9%	23.0%	+9.8 pp	Model Higher

The statistical model estimates Inter De Limeira's win probability at 32.9%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 23.0%, a difference of 9.8 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Brusque win 3–2).

Market Assessment

The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Inter De Limeira.

Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 5 goals materialised
Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result

What failed

Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (5 goals)
Exact score: outside the model's top score bins

Market lesson

Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Brusque more conservatively (27.6% vs model 37.5%, 9.8 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Brusque win 3–2).

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

Aug 15, 2026 · 22:29 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Brusque 37.6% · Draw 29.6% · Inter De Limeira 32.9%
- xG · Brusque 1.35 — Inter De Limeira 1.25
Aug 15, 2026 · 21:59 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Brusque 2.10 · Draw 2.74 · Inter De Limeira 3.98
- Implied 1X2 · Brusque 43.6% · Draw 33.4% · Inter De Limeira 23.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
Aug 15, 2026 · 22:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Brusque 2.10 · Draw 2.74 · Inter De Limeira 3.98
- Implied 1X2 · Brusque 43.6% · Draw 33.4% · Inter De Limeira 23.0%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
Aug 15, 2026 · 22:30 UTC Kickoff
FT Full-time result Brusque win · 3–2
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe

Historical Decision No Primary Bet

Outcome Validated

Pre-match metrics (historical context)

Prediction Reliability 74/100 · High

Validation: Pass

Evidence ★★★★★

Statistical edge detected
Direction agrees with model lean
Validation passed

Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 50/100

Betting Confidence 77/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 09, 2026 · 03:25 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3369492

Closing Odds 3.98

AI Fair Odds —

CLV Pending

Final Result Brusque win · Brusque 3–2 Inter De Limeira

Prediction ✔ Correct

Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?: This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?: xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?: Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?: Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

League: Serie C
Fixture: Brusque vs Inter De Limeira
Kickoff: 2026-08-15 22:30:00
1X2 (model): Home 37.6% · Draw 29.6% · Away 32.9%
xG (showing): Brusque 1.35 — Inter De Limeira 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +1.6%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming Serie C Matches Track Brusque Next Match Prediction Track Inter De Limeira Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Brusque & Inter De Limeira!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Predictions

Serie C — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Botafogo PB	19	10	3	6	33
2	Brusque	19	9	5	5	32
3	Ferroviária	19	8	6	5	30
4	Maringá	19	8	6	5	30
5	Floresta	19	8	6	5	30
6	Inter De Limeira	19	8	6	5	30
7	Paysandu	19	9	2	8	29
8	Santa Cruz	19	8	5	6	29
9	Ypiranga-RS	19	8	5	6	29
10	Guarani Campinas	19	7	7	5	28
11	Figueirense	19	7	7	5	28
12	Maranhão	19	7	6	6	27
13	Amazonas	19	7	5	7	26
14	Caxias	19	6	7	6	25
15	Ituano	19	6	4	9	22
16	Volta Redonda	19	6	3	10	21
17	Barra	19	5	6	8	21
18	Anápolis	19	5	4	10	19
19	AO Itabaiana	19	4	5	10	17
20	Confiança	19	3	4	12	13

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Guarani Campinas	19	34	24	+10	28
2	Maringá	19	32	30	+2	30
3	Botafogo PB	19	28	19	+9	33
4	Brusque	19	28	22	+6	32
5	Ypiranga-RS	19	27	24	+3	29
6	Paysandu	19	26	27	-1	29
7	Ferroviária	19	22	15	+7	30
8	Floresta	19	22	20	+2	30
9	Inter De Limeira	19	22	20	+2	30
10	Barra	19	21	21	0	21
11	Amazonas	19	21	23	-2	26
12	Santa Cruz	19	20	15	+5	29
13	Maranhão	19	19	18	+1	27
14	Figueirense	19	19	22	-3	28
15	Ituano	19	18	21	-3	22
16	Caxias	19	17	16	+1	25
17	Anápolis	19	17	22	-5	19
18	AO Itabaiana	19	14	27	-13	17
19	Volta Redonda	19	13	25	-12	21
20	Confiança	19	11	20	-9	13