Predictions / Football / China. Super League / Sichuan Jiuniu vs Chongqing Tongliang Long

Prediction Audit: Sichuan Jiuniu vs Chongqing Tongliang Long Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Sichuan Jiuniu Sichuan Jiuniu
Aug 02, 2026 - 12:00
2 1.92
0 1.70
xG Accuracy: 61%
Chongqing Tongliang Long Chongqing Tongliang Long

AI correctly predicted the Sichuan Jiuniu win.

The match finished 2–0, validating the model's directional assessment.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Sichuan Jiuniu Sichuan Jiuniu ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 2-1, 1-2, 2-2, 3-1 2-0 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Moderate Disagreement

The model rates Sichuan Jiuniu considerably stronger than the closing betting market.

Largest probability gap: Sichuan Jiuniu +6.1 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Sichuan Jiuniu 42.4% 36.3% +6.1 pp Model Higher
Draw 24.0% 28.7% -4.6 pp Aligned
Chongqing Tongliang Long 33.6% 35.0% -1.4 pp Aligned

The statistical model estimates Sichuan Jiuniu's win probability at 42.4%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 36.3%, a difference of 6.1 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Sichuan Jiuniu win 2–0).

Market Assessment

The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Sichuan Jiuniu.

  • Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (2 goals)

Market lesson

Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Sichuan Jiuniu more conservatively (36.3% vs model 42.4%, 6.1 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Sichuan Jiuniu win 2–0).

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Aug 02, 2026 · 11:59 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Sichuan Jiuniu 42.4% · Draw 24.1% · Chongqing Tongliang Long 33.6%
    • xG · Sichuan Jiuniu 1.92 — Chongqing Tongliang Long 1.70
  2. Aug 02, 2026 · 11:30 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Sichuan Jiuniu 2.65 · Draw 3.36 · Chongqing Tongliang Long 2.75
    • Implied 1X2 · Sichuan Jiuniu 36.3% · Draw 28.7% · Chongqing Tongliang Long 35.0%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Aug 02, 2026 · 11:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Sichuan Jiuniu 2.65 · Draw 3.36 · Chongqing Tongliang Long 2.75
    • Implied 1X2 · Sichuan Jiuniu 36.3% · Draw 28.7% · Chongqing Tongliang Long 35.0%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Aug 02, 2026 · 12:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Sichuan Jiuniu win · 2–0
  6. FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe
Historical Decision No Primary Bet
Outcome Validated
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 76/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 69/100
Betting Confidence 79/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 27, 2026 · 01:00 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1943443

Closing Odds 2.65
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Sichuan Jiuniu win · Sichuan Jiuniu 2–0 Chongqing Tongliang Long
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Super League
  • Fixture: Sichuan Jiuniu vs Chongqing Tongliang Long
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-02 12:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 42.4% · Draw 24.1% · Away 33.6%
  • xG (showing): Sichuan Jiuniu 1.92 — Chongqing Tongliang Long 1.7 (total xG ≈ 3.62)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 29.9% · Over 2.5 70.1%); BTTS Yes (Yes 70.9% · No 29.1%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 70.9% · No 29.1%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (8.7%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 01, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming Super League Matches Track Sichuan Jiuniu Next Match Prediction Track Chongqing Tongliang Long Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Get Premium Predictions for Sichuan Jiuniu & Chongqing Tongliang Long!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Super League Super League — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Chengdu Better City 26 15 7 4 52
2 Dalian Zhixing 26 12 4 10 40
3 Beijing Guoan 26 11 10 5 38
4 Yunnan Yukun 26 11 5 10 38
5 Qingdao Youth Island 26 8 14 4 38
6 Shandong Luneng 26 13 4 9 37
7 SHANGHAI SIPG 26 10 8 8 33
8 Shanghai Shenhua 26 12 5 9 31
9 Chongqing Tongliang Long 26 7 10 9 31
10 Hangzhou Greentown 26 10 6 10 31
11 Sichuan Jiuniu 26 8 4 14 28
12 Henan Jianye 26 8 9 9 27
13 Shenyang Urban 26 7 4 15 25
14 Tianjin Teda 26 9 8 9 25
15 Wuhan Three Towns 26 5 11 10 21
16 Qingdao Jonoon 26 6 3 17 14
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Yunnan Yukun 26 54 51 +3 38
2 Shanghai Shenhua 26 52 46 +6 31
3 Chengdu Better City 26 51 30 +21 52
4 Beijing Guoan 26 49 33 +16 38
5 Shandong Luneng 26 46 43 +3 37
6 Hangzhou Greentown 26 45 43 +2 31
7 SHANGHAI SIPG 26 40 33 +7 33
8 Wuhan Three Towns 26 39 46 -7 21
9 Dalian Zhixing 26 38 42 -4 40
10 Tianjin Teda 26 36 32 +4 25
11 Sichuan Jiuniu 26 34 45 -11 28
12 Shenyang Urban 26 34 47 -13 25
13 Qingdao Jonoon 26 34 53 -19 14
14 Henan Jianye 26 33 35 -2 27
15 Qingdao Youth Island 26 31 32 -1 38
16 Chongqing Tongliang Long 26 27 32 -5 31
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Beijing Guoan 26 4.4 0.1 +4.3 38
2 Shenyang Urban 26 2.8 0.8 +2.0 25
3 Tianjin Teda 26 1.5 0.6 +0.9 25
4 Chengdu Better City 26 2.1 1.5 +0.6 52
5 Qingdao Youth Island 26 1.8 1.2 +0.6 38
6 Yunnan Yukun 26 2.6 2.3 +0.3 38
7 Dalian Zhixing 26 2.3 2.0 +0.3 40
8 Hangzhou Greentown 26 1.7 1.5 +0.2 31
9 Shanghai Shenhua 26 1.5 1.7 -0.2 31
10 Wuhan Three Towns 26 2.0 2.3 -0.3 21
11 Qingdao Jonoon 26 1.5 2.1 -0.6 14
12 SHANGHAI SIPG 26 1.2 1.8 -0.6 33
13 Sichuan Jiuniu 26 0.6 1.5 -0.9 28
14 Chongqing Tongliang Long 26 0.8 2.8 -2.0 31
15 Shandong Luneng 26 2.4 7.0 -4.6 37
16 Henan Jianye 26 — — — 27