Predictions / Football / China. Super League / Qingdao Jonoon vs Tianjin Teda

Prediction Audit: Qingdao Jonoon vs Tianjin Teda Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Qingdao Jonoon Qingdao Jonoon
Jul 25, 2026 - 09:30
0 2.59
2 1.12
xG Accuracy: 38%
Tianjin Teda Tianjin Teda

The model missed the final outcome (Tianjin Teda win 0–2).

The model had projected Qingdao Jonoon at 58.2%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Qingdao Jonoon Tianjin Teda ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 2-1, 2-0, 3-1, 1-1, 3-0 0-2 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The model rates Qingdao Jonoon considerably stronger than the closing betting market.

Largest probability gap: Qingdao Jonoon +24.8 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Qingdao Jonoon 58.2% 33.4% +24.8 pp Model Edge
Draw 22.5% 28.7% -6.2 pp Market Higher
Tianjin Teda 19.3% 37.9% -18.6 pp Market Higher

The statistical model estimates Qingdao Jonoon's win probability at 58.2%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 33.4%, a difference of 24.8 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Tianjin Teda win 0–2.

Post Match Insights

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (2 goals)

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Qingdao Jonoon by 24.8 percentage points (33.4% vs model 58.2%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Jul 25, 2026 · 19:58 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Qingdao Jonoon 58.2% · Draw 22.5% · Tianjin Teda 19.3%
    • xG · Qingdao Jonoon 2.59 — Tianjin Teda 1.12
  2. Jul 25, 2026 · 09:03 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Qingdao Jonoon 2.88 · Draw 3.36 · Tianjin Teda 2.54
    • Implied 1X2 · Qingdao Jonoon 33.4% · Draw 28.7% · Tianjin Teda 37.9%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Jul 25, 2026 · 09:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Qingdao Jonoon 2.88 · Draw 3.36 · Tianjin Teda 2.54
    • Implied 1X2 · Qingdao Jonoon 33.4% · Draw 28.7% · Tianjin Teda 37.9%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Jul 25, 2026 · 09:30 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Tianjin Teda win · 0–2
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 39/100 · Low
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (25 pp)
  • High xG deviation from league baseline (92%+)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • Strong model lean
  • Pricing remains divergent
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Monitoring Confidence 11/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 23, 2026 · 13:56 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1453324

Closing Odds 2.88
AI Fair Odds 1.44
CLV Pending
Final Result Tianjin Teda win · Qingdao Jonoon 0–2 Tianjin Teda
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Probability Calibration

  • Expected: 69.4%
  • Historical Bucket: 65–70% — Building sample

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Chinese Super League
  • Fixture: Qingdao Jonoon vs Tianjin Teda
  • Kickoff: 2026-07-25 09:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 35.0% · Draw 35.0% · Away 30.0%
  • xG (showing): Qingdao Jonoon 2.59 — Tianjin Teda 1.12 (total xG ≈ 3.71)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): See the Over/Under and BTTS cards for any directional lean text.
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming Super League Matches Track Qingdao Jonoon Next Match Prediction Track Tianjin Teda Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Get Premium Predictions for Qingdao Jonoon & Tianjin Teda!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Super League Super League — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Chengdu Better City 26 15 7 4 52
2 Dalian Zhixing 26 12 4 10 40
3 Beijing Guoan 26 11 10 5 38
4 Yunnan Yukun 26 11 5 10 38
5 Qingdao Youth Island 26 8 14 4 38
6 Shandong Luneng 26 13 4 9 37
7 SHANGHAI SIPG 26 10 8 8 33
8 Shanghai Shenhua 26 12 5 9 31
9 Chongqing Tongliang Long 26 7 10 9 31
10 Hangzhou Greentown 26 10 6 10 31
11 Sichuan Jiuniu 26 8 4 14 28
12 Henan Jianye 26 8 9 9 27
13 Shenyang Urban 26 7 4 15 25
14 Tianjin Teda 26 9 8 9 25
15 Wuhan Three Towns 26 5 11 10 21
16 Qingdao Jonoon 26 6 3 17 14
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Yunnan Yukun 26 54 51 +3 38
2 Shanghai Shenhua 26 52 46 +6 31
3 Chengdu Better City 26 51 30 +21 52
4 Beijing Guoan 26 49 33 +16 38
5 Shandong Luneng 26 46 43 +3 37
6 Hangzhou Greentown 26 45 43 +2 31
7 SHANGHAI SIPG 26 40 33 +7 33
8 Wuhan Three Towns 26 39 46 -7 21
9 Dalian Zhixing 26 38 42 -4 40
10 Tianjin Teda 26 36 32 +4 25
11 Sichuan Jiuniu 26 34 45 -11 28
12 Shenyang Urban 26 34 47 -13 25
13 Qingdao Jonoon 26 34 53 -19 14
14 Henan Jianye 26 33 35 -2 27
15 Qingdao Youth Island 26 31 32 -1 38
16 Chongqing Tongliang Long 26 27 32 -5 31
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Beijing Guoan 26 4.4 0.1 +4.3 38
2 Shenyang Urban 26 2.8 0.8 +2.0 25
3 Tianjin Teda 26 1.5 0.6 +0.9 25
4 Chengdu Better City 26 2.1 1.5 +0.6 52
5 Qingdao Youth Island 26 1.8 1.2 +0.6 38
6 Yunnan Yukun 26 2.6 2.3 +0.3 38
7 Dalian Zhixing 26 2.3 2.0 +0.3 40
8 Hangzhou Greentown 26 1.7 1.5 +0.2 31
9 Shanghai Shenhua 26 1.5 1.7 -0.2 31
10 Wuhan Three Towns 26 2.0 2.3 -0.3 21
11 Qingdao Jonoon 26 1.5 2.1 -0.6 14
12 SHANGHAI SIPG 26 1.2 1.8 -0.6 33
13 Sichuan Jiuniu 26 0.6 1.5 -0.9 28
14 Chongqing Tongliang Long 26 0.8 2.8 -2.0 31
15 Shandong Luneng 26 2.4 7.0 -4.6 37
16 Henan Jianye 26 — — — 27