Predictions / Football / China. Super League / Yunnan Yukun vs SHANGHAI SIPG

Prediction Audit: Yunnan Yukun vs SHANGHAI SIPG Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Yunnan Yukun Yunnan Yukun
Jul 17, 2026 - 12:00
2 3.08
2 1.05
xG Accuracy: 57%
SHANGHAI SIPG SHANGHAI SIPG

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 2–2).

The model had projected Yunnan Yukun at 76.9%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade C

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Yunnan Yukun Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 3-1, 2-1, 3-0, 2-0, 4-1 2-2 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The model rates Yunnan Yukun considerably stronger than the closing betting market.

Largest probability gap: Yunnan Yukun +39.4 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Yunnan Yukun 76.9% 37.5% +39.4 pp Model Edge
Draw 14.2% 23.0% -8.8 pp Market Higher
SHANGHAI SIPG 8.8% 39.5% -30.6 pp Market Higher

The statistical model estimates Yunnan Yukun's win probability at 76.9%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 37.5%, a difference of 39.4 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Draw 2–2.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 4.13) — 4 goals materialised
  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
  • Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile

What failed

  • 1X2: model leaned Yunnan Yukun; match finished Draw
  • Exact score: outside the model's top score bins

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Yunnan Yukun by 39.4 percentage points (37.5% vs model 76.9%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Jul 17, 2026 · 13:24 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Yunnan Yukun 76.9% · Draw 14.2% · SHANGHAI SIPG 8.9%
    • xG · Yunnan Yukun 3.08 — SHANGHAI SIPG 1.05
  2. Jul 17, 2026 · 11:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Yunnan Yukun 2.57 · Draw 4.18 · SHANGHAI SIPG 2.44
    • Implied 1X2 · Yunnan Yukun 37.5% · Draw 23.0% · SHANGHAI SIPG 39.5%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Jul 17, 2026 · 11:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Yunnan Yukun 2.57 · Draw 4.18 · SHANGHAI SIPG 2.44
    • Implied 1X2 · Yunnan Yukun 37.5% · Draw 23.0% · SHANGHAI SIPG 39.5%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Jul 17, 2026 · 12:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 2–2
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 17/100 · Not reliable
  • Validation: Fail
  • Large market gap (39 pp)
  • High xG deviation from league baseline (128%+)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • Strong model lean
  • Market strongly disagrees on price
  • Validation failed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Monitoring Confidence 4/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 24, 2026 · 01:49 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1529073

Closing Odds 2.57
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · Yunnan Yukun 2–2 SHANGHAI SIPG
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade C

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Model favours Yunnan Yukun; market prices SHANGHAI SIPG instead — inputs may be missing or stale.

  • Model: Yunnan Yukun 3.08 xG vs SHANGHAI SIPG 1.05 → Yunnan Yukun 76.9%
  • Market: SHANGHAI SIPG ~37.5% implied
  • Validation failed — do not treat 1X2 EV as actionable.

Do not act on 1X2 value until validation passes. Structural leans (O/U, BTTS) need separate odds review.

Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 22.0% · Over 2.5 78.0%); BTTS Yes (Yes 62.7% · No 37.3%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 30, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming Super League Matches Track Yunnan Yukun Next Match Prediction Track SHANGHAI SIPG Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Get Premium Predictions for Yunnan Yukun & SHANGHAI SIPG!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Super League Super League — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Chengdu Better City 26 15 7 4 52
2 Dalian Zhixing 26 12 4 10 40
3 Beijing Guoan 26 11 10 5 38
4 Yunnan Yukun 26 11 5 10 38
5 Qingdao Youth Island 26 8 14 4 38
6 Shandong Luneng 26 13 4 9 37
7 SHANGHAI SIPG 26 10 8 8 33
8 Shanghai Shenhua 26 12 5 9 31
9 Chongqing Tongliang Long 26 7 10 9 31
10 Hangzhou Greentown 26 10 6 10 31
11 Sichuan Jiuniu 26 8 4 14 28
12 Henan Jianye 26 8 9 9 27
13 Shenyang Urban 26 7 4 15 25
14 Tianjin Teda 26 9 8 9 25
15 Wuhan Three Towns 26 5 11 10 21
16 Qingdao Jonoon 26 6 3 17 14
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Yunnan Yukun 26 54 51 +3 38
2 Shanghai Shenhua 26 52 46 +6 31
3 Chengdu Better City 26 51 30 +21 52
4 Beijing Guoan 26 49 33 +16 38
5 Shandong Luneng 26 46 43 +3 37
6 Hangzhou Greentown 26 45 43 +2 31
7 SHANGHAI SIPG 26 40 33 +7 33
8 Wuhan Three Towns 26 39 46 -7 21
9 Dalian Zhixing 26 38 42 -4 40
10 Tianjin Teda 26 36 32 +4 25
11 Sichuan Jiuniu 26 34 45 -11 28
12 Shenyang Urban 26 34 47 -13 25
13 Qingdao Jonoon 26 34 53 -19 14
14 Henan Jianye 26 33 35 -2 27
15 Qingdao Youth Island 26 31 32 -1 38
16 Chongqing Tongliang Long 26 27 32 -5 31
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Beijing Guoan 26 4.4 0.1 +4.3 38
2 Shenyang Urban 26 2.8 0.8 +2.0 25
3 Tianjin Teda 26 1.5 0.6 +0.9 25
4 Chengdu Better City 26 2.1 1.5 +0.6 52
5 Qingdao Youth Island 26 1.8 1.2 +0.6 38
6 Yunnan Yukun 26 2.6 2.3 +0.3 38
7 Dalian Zhixing 26 2.3 2.0 +0.3 40
8 Hangzhou Greentown 26 1.7 1.5 +0.2 31
9 Shanghai Shenhua 26 1.5 1.7 -0.2 31
10 Wuhan Three Towns 26 2.0 2.3 -0.3 21
11 Qingdao Jonoon 26 1.5 2.1 -0.6 14
12 SHANGHAI SIPG 26 1.2 1.8 -0.6 33
13 Sichuan Jiuniu 26 0.6 1.5 -0.9 28
14 Chongqing Tongliang Long 26 0.8 2.8 -2.0 31
15 Shandong Luneng 26 2.4 7.0 -4.6 37
16 Henan Jianye 26 — — — 27