The model missed the final outcome (Hills Brumbies win 3–1).
The model had projected Rydalmere Lions at 39.0%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Rydalmere Lions Hills Brumbies ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 3-1 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hills Brumbies | 31.5% | 50.8% | -19.3 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.5% | 23.4% | +6.1 pp | Model Higher |
| Rydalmere Lions | 39.0% | 25.8% | +13.2 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates Hills Brumbies's win probability at 50.8%, compared with the model's estimate of 31.5%, a difference of 19.3 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Hills Brumbies win 3–1.
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about Hills Brumbies than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 4 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (4 goals)
- 1X2: model leaned Rydalmere Lions; match finished Hills Brumbies
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Rydalmere Lions by 19.3 percentage points (58.3% vs model 39.0%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Aug 22, 2026 · 06:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Hills Brumbies 31.5% · Draw 29.5% · Rydalmere Lions 39.0%
- xG · Hills Brumbies 1.22 — Rydalmere Lions 1.38
-
Aug 22, 2026 · 06:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Hills Brumbies 1.75 · Draw 3.79 · Rydalmere Lions 3.45
- Implied 1X2 · Hills Brumbies 50.8% · Draw 23.4% · Rydalmere Lions 25.8%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 22, 2026 · 06:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Hills Brumbies 1.75 · Draw 3.79 · Rydalmere Lions 3.45
- Implied 1X2 · Hills Brumbies 50.8% · Draw 23.4% · Rydalmere Lions 25.8%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Aug 22, 2026 · 07:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Hills Brumbies win · 3–1
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (19 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Hills Brumbies & Rydalmere Lions!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
New South Wales NPL 2 — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blacktown Spartans | 30 | 21 | 6 | 3 | 69 |
| 2 | Northern Tigers | 30 | 17 | 8 | 5 | 59 |
| 3 | Bankstown City Lions | 30 | 17 | 5 | 8 | 56 |
| 4 | Canterbury Bankstown | 30 | 15 | 6 | 9 | 51 |
| 5 | Hills Brumbies | 30 | 14 | 7 | 9 | 49 |
| 6 | Macarthur Rams | 30 | 14 | 6 | 10 | 48 |
| 7 | Hakoah Sydney City | 30 | 11 | 10 | 9 | 43 |
| 8 | Rydalmere Lions | 30 | 11 | 8 | 11 | 41 |
| 9 | Bulls Academy | 30 | 11 | 5 | 14 | 38 |
| 10 | Inter Lions | 30 | 10 | 5 | 15 | 35 |
| 11 | Hurstville FC | 30 | 9 | 6 | 15 | 33 |
| 12 | Central Coast II | 30 | 8 | 7 | 15 | 31 |
| 13 | Dulwich Hill | 30 | 7 | 9 | 14 | 30 |
| 14 | Newcastle Jets II | 30 | 6 | 11 | 13 | 29 |
| 15 | Prospect United | 30 | 4 | 14 | 12 | 26 |
| 16 | Mt Druitt Town | 30 | 6 | 5 | 19 | 23 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Blacktown Spartans | 30 | 79 | 36 | +43 | 69 |
| 2 | Canterbury Bankstown | 30 | 71 | 53 | +18 | 51 |
| 3 | Bankstown City Lions | 30 | 65 | 45 | +20 | 56 |
| 4 | Hills Brumbies | 30 | 62 | 45 | +17 | 49 |
| 5 | Hakoah Sydney City | 30 | 62 | 50 | +12 | 43 |
| 6 | Northern Tigers | 30 | 55 | 30 | +25 | 59 |
| 7 | Newcastle Jets II | 30 | 55 | 73 | -18 | 29 |
| 8 | Bulls Academy | 30 | 52 | 50 | +2 | 38 |
| 9 | Central Coast II | 30 | 46 | 67 | -21 | 31 |
| 10 | Rydalmere Lions | 30 | 43 | 46 | -3 | 41 |
| 11 | Hurstville FC | 30 | 42 | 55 | -13 | 33 |
| 12 | Macarthur Rams | 30 | 40 | 36 | +4 | 48 |
| 13 | Dulwich Hill | 30 | 40 | 58 | -18 | 30 |
| 14 | Inter Lions | 30 | 39 | 54 | -15 | 35 |
| 15 | Mt Druitt Town | 30 | 35 | 69 | -34 | 23 |
| 16 | Prospect United | 30 | 33 | 52 | -19 | 26 |