AI correctly predicted the Pacific FC win.
The match finished 3–4, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (7 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Pacific FC Pacific FC ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-2, 2-2, 1-1, 1-3, 2-1 3-4 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| York United | 25.8% | 51.4% | -25.6 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 21.0% | 23.1% | -2.1 pp | Aligned |
| Pacific FC | 53.2% | 25.5% | +27.7 pp | Model Edge |
The statistical model estimates Pacific FC's win probability at 53.2%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 25.5%, a difference of 27.7 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Pacific FC win 3–4).
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 4.11) — 7 goals materialised
- Pacific FC attacking xG significantly stronger (2.42 vs 1.69)
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
What failed
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Pacific FC more conservatively (25.5% vs model 53.2%, 27.7 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Pacific FC win 3–4).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Sep 27, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · York United 25.8% · Draw 21.0% · Pacific FC 53.2%
- xG · York United 1.69 — Pacific FC 2.42
-
Sep 27, 2026 · 17:30 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · York United 1.78 · Draw 3.96 · Pacific FC 3.59
- Implied 1X2 · York United 51.4% · Draw 23.1% · Pacific FC 25.5%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 27, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · York United 1.78 · Draw 3.96 · Pacific FC 3.59
- Implied 1X2 · York United 51.4% · Draw 23.1% · Pacific FC 25.5%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 27, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Pacific FC win · 3–4
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (28 pp)
- High xG deviation from league baseline (79%+)
- Statistical edge detected
- Market strongly disagrees on price
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for York United & Pacific FC!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Canadian Premier League — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cavalry FC | 23 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 53 |
| 2 | Forge | 23 | 14 | 5 | 4 | 47 |
| 3 | Atlético Ottawa | 24 | 11 | 4 | 9 | 37 |
| 4 | Vancouver FC | 25 | 9 | 6 | 10 | 33 |
| 5 | HFX Wanderers FC | 24 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 26 |
| 6 | Supra du Quebec | 23 | 7 | 4 | 12 | 25 |
| 7 | York United | 23 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 24 |
| 8 | Pacific FC | 23 | 2 | 8 | 13 | 14 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cavalry FC | 23 | 48 | 13 | +35 | 53 |
| 2 | York United | 23 | 36 | 53 | -17 | 24 |
| 3 | Forge | 23 | 35 | 17 | +18 | 47 |
| 4 | Vancouver FC | 25 | 35 | 33 | +2 | 33 |
| 5 | Atlético Ottawa | 24 | 35 | 39 | -4 | 37 |
| 6 | HFX Wanderers FC | 24 | 35 | 39 | -4 | 26 |
| 7 | Supra du Quebec | 23 | 31 | 44 | -13 | 25 |
| 8 | Pacific FC | 23 | 30 | 47 | -17 | 14 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cavalry FC | 23 | 7.3 | 2.4 | +4.9 | 53 |
| 2 | Pacific FC | 23 | 12.1 | 9.3 | +2.8 | 14 |
| 3 | Forge | 23 | 8.3 | 6.8 | +1.5 | 47 |
| 4 | Vancouver FC | 25 | 6.4 | 5.8 | +0.6 | 33 |
| 5 | Supra du Quebec | 23 | 9.9 | 10.1 | -0.2 | 25 |
| 6 | HFX Wanderers FC | 24 | 9.0 | 10.8 | -1.8 | 26 |
| 7 | Atlético Ottawa | 24 | 6.8 | 9.3 | -2.5 | 37 |
| 8 | York United | 23 | 7.3 | 12.5 | -5.2 | 24 |