AI correctly predicted the Vancouver FC win.
The match finished 4–0, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Vancouver FC Vancouver FC ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 4-0 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vancouver FC | 37.4% | 45.6% | -8.2 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.2% | 26.9% | +2.3 pp | Aligned |
| York United | 33.4% | 27.6% | +5.8 pp | Model Higher |
The closing market estimates Vancouver FC's win probability at 45.6%, compared with the model's estimate of 37.4%, a difference of 8.2 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Vancouver FC win 4–0).
Market Assessment
The market and model broadly agree on Vancouver FC. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 4 goals materialised
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (4 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Vancouver FC higher (45.6% vs model 37.4%, 8.2 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Vancouver FC win 4–0).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Jul 04, 2026 · 22:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Vancouver FC 37.4% · Draw 29.1% · York United 33.4%
- xG · Vancouver FC 1.28 — York United 1.32
-
Jul 04, 2026 · 22:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Vancouver FC 2.01 · Draw 3.41 · York United 3.32
- Implied 1X2 · Vancouver FC 45.6% · Draw 26.9% · York United 27.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 04, 2026 · 22:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Vancouver FC 2.01 · Draw 3.41 · York United 3.32
- Implied 1X2 · Vancouver FC 45.6% · Draw 26.9% · York United 27.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 04, 2026 · 23:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Vancouver FC win · 4–0
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Vancouver FC & York United!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Canadian Premier League — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cavalry FC | 23 | 16 | 5 | 2 | 53 |
| 2 | Forge | 23 | 14 | 5 | 4 | 47 |
| 3 | Atlético Ottawa | 24 | 11 | 4 | 9 | 37 |
| 4 | Vancouver FC | 25 | 9 | 6 | 10 | 33 |
| 5 | HFX Wanderers FC | 24 | 7 | 5 | 12 | 26 |
| 6 | Supra du Quebec | 23 | 7 | 4 | 12 | 25 |
| 7 | York United | 23 | 5 | 9 | 9 | 24 |
| 8 | Pacific FC | 23 | 2 | 8 | 13 | 14 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cavalry FC | 23 | 48 | 13 | +35 | 53 |
| 2 | York United | 23 | 36 | 53 | -17 | 24 |
| 3 | Forge | 23 | 35 | 17 | +18 | 47 |
| 4 | Vancouver FC | 25 | 35 | 33 | +2 | 33 |
| 5 | Atlético Ottawa | 24 | 35 | 39 | -4 | 37 |
| 6 | HFX Wanderers FC | 24 | 35 | 39 | -4 | 26 |
| 7 | Supra du Quebec | 23 | 31 | 44 | -13 | 25 |
| 8 | Pacific FC | 23 | 30 | 47 | -17 | 14 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cavalry FC | 23 | 7.3 | 2.4 | +4.9 | 53 |
| 2 | Pacific FC | 23 | 12.1 | 9.3 | +2.8 | 14 |
| 3 | Forge | 23 | 8.3 | 6.8 | +1.5 | 47 |
| 4 | Vancouver FC | 25 | 6.4 | 5.8 | +0.6 | 33 |
| 5 | Supra du Quebec | 23 | 9.9 | 10.1 | -0.2 | 25 |
| 6 | HFX Wanderers FC | 24 | 9.0 | 10.8 | -1.8 | 26 |
| 7 | Atlético Ottawa | 24 | 6.8 | 9.3 | -2.5 | 37 |
| 8 | York United | 23 | 7.3 | 12.5 | -5.2 | 24 |
