Prediction Audit: Landvetter IS vs Torslanda Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Sep 25, 2026 - 17:00
3 1.31
1 1.29
xG Accuracy: 58%

AI correctly predicted the Landvetter IS win.

The match finished 3–1, validating the model's directional assessment.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Landvetter IS Landvetter IS ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 3-1 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Landvetter IS higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Landvetter IS -25.4 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Landvetter IS 35.6% 61.1% -25.4 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.6% 21.2% +8.4 pp Model Higher
Torslanda 34.7% 17.7% +17.0 pp Model Edge

The closing market estimates Landvetter IS's win probability at 61.1%, compared with the model's estimate of 35.6%, a difference of 25.4 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Landvetter IS win 3–1).

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 4 goals materialised

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (4 goals)

Market lesson

Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Landvetter IS higher (61.0% vs model 35.6%, 25.4 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Landvetter IS win 3–1).

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Sep 25, 2026 · 16:59 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Landvetter IS 35.6% · Draw 29.7% · Torslanda 34.7%
    • xG · Landvetter IS 1.31 — Torslanda 1.29
  2. Sep 25, 2026 · 16:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Landvetter IS 1.45 · Draw 4.17 · Torslanda 5.00
    • Implied 1X2 · Landvetter IS 61.1% · Draw 21.2% · Torslanda 17.7%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Sep 25, 2026 · 16:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Landvetter IS 1.45 · Draw 4.17 · Torslanda 5.00
    • Implied 1X2 · Landvetter IS 61.1% · Draw 21.2% · Torslanda 17.7%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Sep 25, 2026 · 17:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Landvetter IS win · 3–1
  6. FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Validated
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 50/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (25 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Market strongly disagrees on price
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Betting Confidence 32/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 19, 2026 · 01:12 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-9567995

Closing Odds 1.45
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Landvetter IS win · Landvetter IS 3–1 Torslanda
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Division 2 - Västra Götaland
  • Fixture: Landvetter IS vs Torslanda
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-25 17:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 35.6% · Draw 29.7% · Away 34.7%
  • xG (showing): Landvetter IS 1.31 — Torslanda 1.29 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS No (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.6%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 01, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Landvetter IS & Torslanda!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Division 2 - Västra Götaland Division 2 - Västra Götaland — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Landvetter IS 23 16 3 4 51
2 Dalstorps 23 12 7 4 43
3 Hestrafor 23 12 5 6 41
4 Jonsered 23 11 6 6 39
5 Västra Frölunda 23 10 6 7 36
6 Lindome 23 10 4 9 34
7 Böljan 23 9 7 7 34
8 Qviding FIF 23 10 4 9 34
9 Onsala 23 7 6 10 27
10 Kongahälla 23 7 6 10 27
11 Åstorp 23 7 5 11 26
12 Torslanda 23 6 7 10 25
13 Galtabacks 23 5 5 13 20
14 Astrio 23 2 3 18 9
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Hestrafor 23 48 38 +10 41
2 Dalstorps 23 44 25 +19 43
3 Västra Frölunda 23 44 38 +6 36
4 Qviding FIF 23 44 43 +1 34
5 Lindome 23 42 37 +5 34
6 Landvetter IS 23 41 19 +22 51
7 Jonsered 23 39 37 +2 39
8 Torslanda 23 37 42 -5 25
9 Böljan 23 36 31 +5 34
10 Galtabacks 23 35 42 -7 20
11 Kongahälla 23 35 43 -8 27
12 Onsala 23 32 37 -5 27
13 Åstorp 23 28 38 -10 26
14 Astrio 23 21 56 -35 9