Prediction Audit: Skála vs HB Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Sep 13, 2026 - 17:30
2 1.06
2 1.54
xG Accuracy: 68%

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 2–2).

The model had projected HB at 46.8%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 HB Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-2, 0-2, 1-0 2-2 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Moderate Disagreement

The closing market prices HB higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: HB -8.4 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Skála 24.5% 21.4% +3.2 pp Aligned
Draw 28.6% 23.4% +5.2 pp Model Higher
HB 46.8% 55.2% -8.4 pp Market Higher

The closing market estimates HB's win probability at 55.2%, compared with the model's estimate of 46.8%, a difference of 8.4 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Draw 2–2.

Market Assessment

The market and model broadly agree on HB. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.

  • Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 4 goals materialised

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (4 goals)

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on HB by 8.4 percentage points (55.2% vs model 46.8%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Sep 13, 2026 · 17:29 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Skála 24.6% · Draw 28.7% · HB 46.8%
    • xG · Skála 1.06 — HB 1.54
  2. Sep 13, 2026 · 17:02 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Skála 3.94 · Draw 3.83 · HB 1.74
    • Implied 1X2 · Skála 23.3% · Draw 24.0% · HB 52.7%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Sep 13, 2026 · 17:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Skála 4.34 · Draw 3.96 · HB 1.68
    • Implied 1X2 · Skála 21.4% · Draw 23.4% · HB 55.2%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Sep 13, 2026 · 17:30 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 2–2
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe
Historical Decision No Primary Bet
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 75/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 58/100
Betting Confidence 78/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 07, 2026 · 02:12 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-7456165

Closing Odds 1.68
AI Fair Odds
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · Skála 2–2 HB
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Meistaradeildin
  • Fixture: Skála vs HB
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-13 17:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 24.6% · Draw 28.7% · Away 46.8%
  • xG (showing): Skála 1.06 — HB 1.54 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 51.8% · Implied: 41.4% · Probability edge: +10.4 pts · Est. EV: +21.7%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 52.9% · No 47.1%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.1%)

Where EV is shown, it is estimated return per unit stake at the best tracked decimal price — not the same thing as a raw probability gap.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 16, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Skála & HB!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Meistaradeildin MeistaradeildinStandings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 NSI Runavik 21 13 5 3 44
2 KI Klaksvik 21 11 8 2 41
3 HB 21 11 4 6 37
4 B36 Torshavn 21 9 8 4 35
5 Vikingur Gota 21 8 9 4 33
6 AB 21 7 2 12 23
7 Skála 21 5 6 10 21
8 EB / Streymur 21 5 5 11 20
9 07 Vestur 21 5 3 13 18
10 B68 21 4 4 13 16
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 NSI Runavik 21 44 24 +20 44
2 KI Klaksvik 21 42 19 +23 41
3 HB 21 38 25 +13 37
4 B36 Torshavn 21 31 24 +7 35
5 Vikingur Gota 21 30 23 +7 33
6 AB 21 29 37 -8 23
7 EB / Streymur 21 25 35 -10 20
8 Skála 21 21 33 -12 21
9 B68 21 21 42 -21 16
10 07 Vestur 21 18 37 -19 18