The model missed the final outcome (Draw 1–1).
The model had projected Union La Calera at 56.5%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Union La Calera Draw ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 2-1, 1-0, 2-0, 3-1 1-1 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Union La Calera | 56.5% | 38.7% | +17.8 pp | Model Edge |
| Draw | 24.5% | 30.2% | -5.7 pp | Market Higher |
| Everton de Vina | 19.0% | 31.1% | -12.1 pp | Market Higher |
The statistical model estimates Union La Calera's win probability at 56.5%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 38.7%, a difference of 17.8 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Draw 1–1.
Market Assessment
The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Union La Calera.
- The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Exact score 1–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (2 goals)
- 1X2: model leaned Union La Calera; match finished Draw
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Union La Calera by 17.8 percentage points (38.7% vs model 56.5%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Jul 27, 2026 · 22:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Union La Calera 56.5% · Draw 24.5% · Everton de Vina 19.0%
- xG · Union La Calera 1.94 — Everton de Vina 1.06
-
Jul 27, 2026 · 22:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Union La Calera 2.49 · Draw 3.19 · Everton de Vina 3.10
- Implied 1X2 · Union La Calera 38.7% · Draw 30.2% · Everton de Vina 31.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 27, 2026 · 22:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Union La Calera 2.49 · Draw 3.19 · Everton de Vina 3.10
- Implied 1X2 · Union La Calera 38.7% · Draw 30.2% · Everton de Vina 31.1%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 27, 2026 · 23:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Draw · 1–1
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (18 pp)
- Statistical edge detected
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotProbability Calibration
- Expected: 56.5%
- Historical Bucket: 55–60% — Building sample
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Union La Calera & Everton de Vina!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Primera División — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Colo Colo | 23 | 17 | 3 | 3 | 54 |
| 2 | U. Catolica | 23 | 13 | 3 | 7 | 42 |
| 3 | Universidad de Chile | 23 | 12 | 6 | 5 | 42 |
| 4 | Everton de Vina | 23 | 10 | 6 | 7 | 36 |
| 5 | Palestino | 23 | 11 | 3 | 9 | 36 |
| 6 | Deportes Limache | 23 | 10 | 3 | 10 | 33 |
| 7 | Nublense | 23 | 8 | 8 | 7 | 32 |
| 8 | Concepción | 23 | 9 | 4 | 10 | 31 |
| 9 | D. La Serena | 23 | 7 | 9 | 7 | 30 |
| 10 | Coquimbo Unido | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 29 |
| 11 | A. Italiano | 23 | 7 | 7 | 9 | 28 |
| 12 | O'Higgins | 23 | 8 | 3 | 12 | 27 |
| 13 | Huachipato | 21 | 7 | 4 | 10 | 25 |
| 14 | Cobresal | 23 | 7 | 3 | 13 | 24 |
| 15 | Universidad de Concepcion | 22 | 6 | 4 | 12 | 22 |
| 16 | Union La Calera | 23 | 4 | 5 | 14 | 17 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | U. Catolica | 23 | 50 | 33 | +17 | 42 |
| 2 | Colo Colo | 23 | 48 | 22 | +26 | 54 |
| 3 | Deportes Limache | 23 | 43 | 35 | +8 | 33 |
| 4 | Everton de Vina | 23 | 37 | 25 | +12 | 36 |
| 5 | Palestino | 23 | 36 | 33 | +3 | 36 |
| 6 | Universidad de Chile | 23 | 35 | 19 | +16 | 42 |
| 7 | D. La Serena | 23 | 34 | 38 | -4 | 30 |
| 8 | Cobresal | 23 | 34 | 44 | -10 | 24 |
| 9 | Coquimbo Unido | 22 | 31 | 31 | 0 | 29 |
| 10 | Huachipato | 21 | 29 | 39 | -10 | 25 |
| 11 | Nublense | 23 | 28 | 31 | -3 | 32 |
| 12 | O'Higgins | 23 | 28 | 36 | -8 | 27 |
| 13 | A. Italiano | 23 | 26 | 31 | -5 | 28 |
| 14 | Concepción | 23 | 25 | 26 | -1 | 31 |
| 15 | Union La Calera | 23 | 19 | 40 | -21 | 17 |
| 16 | Universidad de Concepcion | 22 | 17 | 37 | -20 | 22 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | U. Catolica | 23 | 1.5 | 1.2 | +0.3 | 42 |
| 2 | Nublense | 23 | 1.2 | 1.5 | -0.3 | 32 |
| 3 | Colo Colo | 23 | — | — | — | 54 |
| 4 | Universidad de Chile | 23 | — | — | — | 42 |
| 5 | Everton de Vina | 23 | — | — | — | 36 |
| 6 | Palestino | 23 | — | — | — | 36 |
| 7 | Deportes Limache | 23 | — | — | — | 33 |
| 8 | Concepción | 23 | — | — | — | 31 |
| 9 | D. La Serena | 23 | — | — | — | 30 |
| 10 | Coquimbo Unido | 22 | — | — | — | 29 |
| 11 | A. Italiano | 23 | — | — | — | 28 |
| 12 | O'Higgins | 23 | — | — | — | 27 |
| 13 | Huachipato | 21 | — | — | — | 25 |
| 14 | Cobresal | 23 | — | — | — | 24 |
| 15 | Universidad de Concepcion | 22 | — | — | — | 22 |
| 16 | Union La Calera | 23 | — | — | — | 17 |