Predictions / Football / Sweden. Ettan - Södra / Rosengård vs Hässleholms IF

Prediction Audit: Rosengård vs Hässleholms IF Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Rosengård Rosengård
Sep 26, 2026 - 11:00
2 1.08
1 1.52
xG Accuracy: 67%
Hässleholms IF Hässleholms IF

The model missed the final outcome (Rosengård win 2–1).

The model had projected Hässleholms IF at 45.8%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Hässleholms IF Rosengård ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-2, 0-2, 1-0 2-1 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Rosengård higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Rosengård -25.3 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Rosengård 25.4% 50.6% -25.3 pp Market Higher
Draw 28.8% 25.6% +3.2 pp Aligned
Hässleholms IF 45.8% 23.8% +22.1 pp Model Edge

The closing market estimates Rosengård's win probability at 50.6%, compared with the model's estimate of 25.4%, a difference of 25.3 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Rosengård win 2–1.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Hässleholms IF by 25.3 percentage points (71.1% vs model 45.8%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Sep 26, 2026 · 10:59 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Rosengård 25.4% · Draw 28.8% · Hässleholms IF 45.8%
    • xG · Rosengård 1.08 — Hässleholms IF 1.52
  2. Sep 26, 2026 · 10:30 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Rosengård 1.81 · Draw 3.58 · Hässleholms IF 3.86
    • Implied 1X2 · Rosengård 50.6% · Draw 25.6% · Hässleholms IF 23.8%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Sep 26, 2026 · 10:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Rosengård 1.81 · Draw 3.58 · Hässleholms IF 3.86
    • Implied 1X2 · Rosengård 50.6% · Draw 25.6% · Hässleholms IF 23.8%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Sep 26, 2026 · 11:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Rosengård win · 2–1
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 50/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (25 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Market strongly disagrees on price
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Monitoring Confidence 14/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 21, 2026 · 00:50 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-10079709

Closing Odds 1.81
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Rosengård win · Rosengård 2–1 Hässleholms IF
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Ettan - Södra
  • Fixture: Rosengård vs Hässleholms IF
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-26 11:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 25.4% · Draw 28.8% · Away 45.8%
  • xG (showing): Rosengård 1.08 — Hässleholms IF 1.52 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Best +EV line (same label as hero card when Primary thresholds are not met): Under 2.5 goals
  • Model: 51.8% · Implied: 43.4% · Probability edge: +8.4 pts · Est. EV: +14.0%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 53.2% · No 46.8%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.2%)

Use the cards for tiering; this text only restates the same inputs in narrative form.

Early match state can move realised goals away from pre-kick projections.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming Ettan - Södra Matches Track Rosengård Next Match Prediction Track Hässleholms IF Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Get Premium Predictions for Rosengård & Hässleholms IF!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Ettan - Södra Ettan - Södra — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 trelleborgs FF 24 15 6 3 51
2 Atvidabergs FF 24 13 6 5 45
3 Hässleholms IF 24 13 3 8 42
4 Lund 24 11 8 5 41
5 AFC Malmo 24 10 8 6 38
6 Rosengård 24 10 8 6 38
7 Trollhättan 24 10 7 7 37
8 Jonkopings Sodra 24 9 6 9 33
9 Tvååker 24 9 6 9 33
10 Olympic 24 9 3 12 30
11 Skövde AIK 24 7 9 8 30
12 Eskilsminne 24 8 5 11 29
13 Kristianstad 24 7 6 11 27
14 Laholm 24 6 4 14 22
15 Angelholms FF 24 3 9 12 18
16 Utsikten 24 2 6 16 12
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 trelleborgs FF 24 53 28 +25 51
2 Atvidabergs FF 24 48 34 +14 45
3 Lund 24 46 28 +18 41
4 Hässleholms IF 24 44 29 +15 42
5 AFC Malmo 24 44 35 +9 38
6 Rosengård 24 41 34 +7 38
7 Trollhättan 24 41 36 +5 37
8 Olympic 24 41 46 -5 30
9 Eskilsminne 24 39 44 -5 29
10 Tvååker 24 32 37 -5 33
11 Laholm 24 31 43 -12 22
12 Jonkopings Sodra 24 29 25 +4 33
13 Kristianstad 24 29 36 -7 27
14 Skövde AIK 24 28 36 -8 30
15 Angelholms FF 24 28 47 -19 18
16 Utsikten 24 21 57 -36 12
Ettan - Södra Sweden. Ettan - Södra Predictions