Prediction Audit: Fénix vs Yupanqui Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Jul 27, 2026 - 18:00
1 1.37
1 1.23
xG Accuracy: 85%

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 1–1).

The model had projected Fénix at 36.7%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade C

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Fénix Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-1 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Moderate Disagreement

The model rates Fénix considerably stronger than the closing betting market.

Largest probability gap: Fénix +5.5 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Fénix 36.7% 31.3% +5.5 pp Model Higher
Draw 30.8% 34.4% -3.6 pp Aligned
Yupanqui 32.5% 34.4% -1.9 pp Aligned

The statistical model estimates Fénix's win probability at 36.7%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 31.3%, a difference of 5.5 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Draw 1–1.

Market Assessment

The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Fénix.

  • Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
  • Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
  • Exact score 1–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

  • 1X2: model leaned Fénix; match finished Draw

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Fénix by 5.5 percentage points (31.3% vs model 36.7%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Jul 27, 2026 · 19:28 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Fénix 36.8% · Draw 30.8% · Yupanqui 32.5%
    • xG · Fénix 1.37 — Yupanqui 1.23
  2. Jul 27, 2026 · 17:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Fénix 2.78 · Draw 2.53 · Yupanqui 2.53
    • Implied 1X2 · Fénix 31.3% · Draw 34.4% · Yupanqui 34.4%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Jul 27, 2026 · 17:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Fénix 2.78 · Draw 2.53 · Yupanqui 2.53
    • Implied 1X2 · Fénix 31.3% · Draw 34.4% · Yupanqui 34.4%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Jul 27, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 1–1
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Monitor
Historical Decision Monitor
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 76/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Market Compatibility 25/100
Monitoring Confidence 34/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 23, 2026 · 14:01 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1454960

Closing Odds 2.78
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · Fénix 1–1 Yupanqui
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade C

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Primera C
  • Fixture: Fénix vs Yupanqui
  • Kickoff: 2026-07-27 18:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 36.8% · Draw 30.8% · Away 32.5%
  • xG (showing): Fénix 1.37 — Yupanqui 1.23 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV on tracked lines at current best prices (same as the decision block: no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.4% · No 45.6%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Monitor

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Fénix & Yupanqui!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Primera C Primera C — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Berazategui 30 12 12 6 48
2 Lugano 30 11 13 6 46
3 Sacachispas 30 13 7 10 46
4 Estrella Del Sur 30 11 11 8 44
5 Mercedes 30 11 10 9 43
6 Juventud Unida 30 11 9 10 42
7 Centro Español 29 10 11 8 41
8 Victoriano Arenas 30 9 14 7 41
9 Puerto Nuevo 30 9 11 10 38
10 Defensores de Cambaceres 29 9 9 11 36
11 Deportivo Paraguayo 30 7 10 13 31
12 JJ Urquiza 29 5 14 10 29
13 Leandro N. Alem 29 7 7 15 28
14 Argentino Rosario 30 3 15 12 24
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Berazategui 30 35 21 +14 48
2 Centro Español 29 35 27 +8 41
3 Juventud Unida 30 35 29 +6 42
4 Lugano 30 33 25 +8 46
5 Sacachispas 30 32 26 +6 46
6 Estrella Del Sur 30 31 29 +2 44
7 Mercedes 30 29 23 +6 43
8 Puerto Nuevo 30 27 31 -4 38
9 Argentino Rosario 30 27 39 -12 24
10 Leandro N. Alem 29 27 50 -23 28
11 Defensores de Cambaceres 29 25 28 -3 36
12 Victoriano Arenas 30 23 19 +4 41
13 Deportivo Paraguayo 30 22 38 -16 31
14 JJ Urquiza 29 14 23 -9 29