Predictions / Football / Norway. 3. Division - Girone 1 / Heming vs Ullern

Prediction Audit: Heming vs Ullern Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Heming Heming
Sep 26, 2026 - 11:00
3 1.33
0 1.27
xG Accuracy: 45%
Ullern Ullern

AI correctly predicted the Heming win.

The match finished 3–0, validating the model's directional assessment.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade B-

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Heming Heming ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 3-0 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Heming higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Heming -19.9 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Heming 36.6% 56.5% -19.9 pp Market Higher
Draw 29.6% 16.1% +13.6 pp Model Edge
Ullern 33.8% 27.4% +6.4 pp Model Higher

The closing market estimates Heming's win probability at 56.5%, compared with the model's estimate of 36.6%, a difference of 19.9 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Heming win 3–0).

Market Assessment

The market is materially more optimistic about Heming than the current fair estimate.

  • Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
  • Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
  • Both Teams To Score (No) matched the full-time result

What failed

  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
  • Exact score: outside the model's top score bins

Market lesson

Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Heming higher (56.5% vs model 36.6%, 19.9 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Heming win 3–0).

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Sep 26, 2026 · 10:59 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Heming 36.6% · Draw 29.6% · Ullern 33.8%
    • xG · Heming 1.33 — Ullern 1.27
  2. Sep 26, 2026 · 10:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Heming 1.57 · Draw 5.52 · Ullern 3.24
    • Implied 1X2 · Heming 56.5% · Draw 16.1% · Ullern 27.4%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Sep 26, 2026 · 10:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Heming 1.57 · Draw 5.52 · Ullern 3.24
    • Implied 1X2 · Heming 56.5% · Draw 16.1% · Ullern 27.4%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Sep 26, 2026 · 11:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Heming win · 3–0
  6. FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Monitor
Historical Decision Monitor
Outcome Validated
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 53/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (20 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Pricing remains divergent
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Betting Confidence 42/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 21, 2026 · 00:49 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-10079403

Closing Odds 1.57
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Heming win · Heming 3–0 Ullern
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: 3. Division - Girone 1
  • Fixture: Heming vs Ullern
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-26 11:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 36.6% · Draw 29.6% · Away 33.8%
  • xG (showing): Heming 1.33 — Ullern 1.27 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None (actionable) — best tracked EV is about +1.5%, still below the +2.0% minimum for a headline / default stake (no default bet).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS No (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Monitor

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 27, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming 3. Division - Girone 1 Matches Track Heming Next Match Prediction Track Ullern Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Get Premium Predictions for Heming & Ullern!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
3. Division - Girone 1 3. Division - Girone 1 — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Asker 20 18 1 1 55
2 Heming 21 13 3 5 42
3 Gamle Oslo 21 13 1 7 40
4 Bærum 21 11 2 8 35
5 Vålerenga II 21 11 1 9 34
6 IF Ready 21 9 6 6 33
7 Frigg 20 9 5 6 32
8 Union Carl Berner 20 10 1 9 31
9 KFUM II 20 7 2 11 23
10 Lokomotiv Oslo 21 7 2 12 23
11 Nordstrand 21 6 2 13 20
12 Ullern 21 6 2 13 20
13 Konnerud 21 5 1 15 16
14 SF Grei 21 5 1 15 16
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Asker 20 71 25 +46 55
2 Gamle Oslo 21 68 41 +27 40
3 Bærum 21 61 39 +22 35
4 Heming 21 53 31 +22 42
5 IF Ready 21 53 42 +11 33
6 Frigg 20 49 44 +5 32
7 Vålerenga II 21 47 58 -11 34
8 KFUM II 20 41 58 -17 23
9 Ullern 21 39 57 -18 20
10 Lokomotiv Oslo 21 39 61 -22 23
11 Nordstrand 21 36 48 -12 20
12 SF Grei 21 36 69 -33 16
13 Union Carl Berner 20 35 30 +5 31
14 Konnerud 21 29 54 -25 16
3. Division - Girone 1 Norway. 3. Division - Girone 1 Predictions