Prediction Audit: SJK vs KuPS Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Jul 18, 2026 - 14:00
0 2.95
2 1.70
xG Accuracy: 41%

The model missed the final outcome (KuPS win 0–2).

The model had projected SJK at 56.6%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 SJK KuPS ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 2-1, 3-1, 2-2, 3-2, 4-1 0-2 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The model rates SJK considerably stronger than the closing betting market.

Largest probability gap: SJK +25.0 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
SJK 56.6% 31.6% +25.0 pp Model Edge
Draw 19.6% 24.6% -5.0 pp Aligned
KuPS 23.7% 43.8% -20.1 pp Market Higher

The statistical model estimates SJK's win probability at 56.6%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 31.6%, a difference of 25.0 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE10.

After full time, the result was KuPS win 0–2.

Post Match Insights

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (2 goals)

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on SJK by 25.0 percentage points (31.6% vs model 56.6%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Jul 18, 2026 · 20:19 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · SJK 56.6% · Draw 19.6% · KuPS 23.8%
    • xG · SJK 2.95 — KuPS 1.70
  2. Jul 18, 2026 · 13:32 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · SJK 3.06 · Draw 3.94 · KuPS 2.21
    • Implied 1X2 · SJK 31.6% · Draw 24.6% · KuPS 43.8%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Jul 18, 2026 · 13:51 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE10
    • 1X2 odds · SJK 3.06 · Draw 3.94 · KuPS 2.21
    • Implied 1X2 · SJK 31.6% · Draw 24.6% · KuPS 43.8%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Jul 18, 2026 · 14:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result KuPS win · 0–2
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 38/100 · Low
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (25 pp)
  • High xG deviation from league baseline (119%+)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • Strong model lean
  • Market strongly disagrees on price
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Monitoring Confidence 10/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 24, 2026 · 15:29 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1612219

Closing Odds 3.06
AI Fair Odds 1.77
CLV Pending
Final Result KuPS win · SJK 0–2 KuPS
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Probability Calibration

  • Expected: 56.6%
  • Historical Bucket: 55–60% — Building sample

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Veikkausliiga
  • Fixture: SJK vs KuPS
  • Kickoff: 2026-07-18 14:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 10.0% · Draw 45.0% · Away 45.0%
  • xG (showing): SJK 2.95 — KuPS 1.7 (total xG ≈ 4.65)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): See the Over/Under and BTTS cards for any directional lean text.
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for SJK & KuPS!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Veikkausliiga Veikkausliiga — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 KuPS 22 12 7 3 43
2 Inter Turku 22 11 9 2 42
3 HJK helsinki 22 11 4 7 37
4 Gnistan 22 10 6 6 36
5 AC Oulu 22 10 4 8 34
6 VPS 22 9 6 7 33
7 Lahti 22 9 5 8 32
8 Turku PS 22 8 7 7 31
9 Ilves 22 7 4 11 25
10 SJK 22 4 7 11 19
11 FF Jaro 22 3 6 13 15
12 Mariehamn 22 3 5 14 14
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 KuPS 22 38 23 +15 43
2 HJK helsinki 22 36 27 +9 37
3 Gnistan 22 36 29 +7 36
4 Ilves 22 34 37 -3 25
5 Inter Turku 22 29 16 +13 42
6 VPS 22 29 22 +7 33
7 Turku PS 22 28 23 +5 31
8 Lahti 22 26 19 +7 32
9 AC Oulu 22 25 25 0 34
10 SJK 22 25 33 -8 19
11 FF Jaro 22 18 44 -26 15
12 Mariehamn 22 17 43 -26 14
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Ilves 22 4.2 1.7 +2.5 25
2 AC Oulu 22 2.7 2.2 +0.5 34
3 HJK helsinki 22 2.0 1.6 +0.4 37
4 KuPS 22 2.3 2.0 +0.3 43
5 SJK 22 2.5 2.4 +0.1 19
6 Lahti 22 2.4 2.5 -0.1 32
7 VPS 22 2.0 2.3 -0.3 33
8 Mariehamn 22 2.2 2.7 -0.5 14
9 Turku PS 22 0.9 1.6 -0.7 31
10 FF Jaro 22 2.4 4.6 -2.2 15
11 Inter Turku 22 — — — 42
12 Gnistan 22 — — — 36