Predictions / Football / Sweden. Damallsvenskan / Vittsjö vs Rosengård W

Prediction Audit: Vittsjö vs Rosengård W Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Aug 03, 2026 - 17:00
1 2.68
1 2.43
xG Accuracy: 42%

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 1–1).

The model had projected Vittsjö at 44.8%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (2 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Vittsjö Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 2-2, 3-2, 2-1, 2-3, 1-2 1-1 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The model rates Vittsjö considerably stronger than the closing betting market.

Largest probability gap: Vittsjö +14.0 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Vittsjö 44.8% 30.8% +14.0 pp Model Edge
Draw 19.1% 28.9% -9.8 pp Market Higher
Rosengård W 36.2% 40.4% -4.2 pp Aligned

The statistical model estimates Vittsjö's win probability at 44.8%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 30.8%, a difference of 14.0 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Draw 1–1.

Market Assessment

The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Vittsjö.

  • The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.
  • Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result

What failed

  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (2 goals)
  • 1X2: model leaned Vittsjö; match finished Draw

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Vittsjö by 14.0 percentage points (30.8% vs model 44.8%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Aug 03, 2026 · 16:59 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Vittsjö 44.8% · Draw 19.1% · Rosengård W 36.2%
    • xG · Vittsjö 2.68 — Rosengård W 2.43
  2. Aug 03, 2026 · 16:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Vittsjö 3.02 · Draw 3.22 · Rosengård W 2.30
    • Implied 1X2 · Vittsjö 30.8% · Draw 28.9% · Rosengård W 40.4%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Aug 03, 2026 · 16:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Vittsjö 3.02 · Draw 3.22 · Rosengård W 2.30
    • Implied 1X2 · Vittsjö 30.8% · Draw 28.9% · Rosengård W 40.4%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Aug 03, 2026 · 17:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 1–1
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Monitor
Historical Decision Monitor
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 44/100 · Low
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (14 pp)
  • High xG deviation from league baseline (99%+)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • Statistical edge detected
  • Market has already priced much of the edge
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 10/100
Monitoring Confidence 15/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 28, 2026 · 03:29 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-2132300

Closing Odds 3.02
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · Vittsjö 1–1 Rosengård W
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Damallsvenskan
  • Fixture: Vittsjö vs Rosengård W
  • Kickoff: 2026-08-03 17:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 44.8% · Draw 19.1% · Away 36.2%
  • xG (showing): Vittsjö 2.68 — Rosengård W 2.43 (total xG ≈ 5.11)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 11.6% · Over 2.5 88.4%); BTTS Yes (Yes 85.5% · No 14.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 85.5% · No 14.5%
  • Correct score (top bin): 2-2 (6.4%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Monitor

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Vittsjö & Rosengård W!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Damallsvenskan Damallsvenskan — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Häcken 20 18 1 1 55
2 Hammarby 20 16 2 2 50
3 Malmö FF W 19 10 6 3 36
4 AIK 20 10 4 6 34
5 Kristianstad 20 8 5 7 29
6 Vittsjö 20 8 5 7 29
7 Eskilstuna United 20 8 3 9 27
8 Brommapojkarna W 19 8 2 9 26
9 Piteå W 19 6 5 8 23
10 Djurgården 20 6 3 11 21
11 Växjö 20 5 3 12 18
12 Rosengård W 19 4 5 10 17
13 Norrköping W 20 3 7 10 16
14 Uppsala W 20 1 3 16 6
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Häcken 20 61 13 +48 55
2 Hammarby 20 49 10 +39 50
3 Malmö FF W 19 38 11 +27 36
4 Kristianstad 20 33 32 +1 29
5 AIK 20 29 27 +2 34
6 Vittsjö 20 27 26 +1 29
7 Brommapojkarna W 19 25 33 -8 26
8 Djurgården 20 25 33 -8 21
9 Piteå W 19 23 28 -5 23
10 Växjö 20 23 40 -17 18
11 Rosengård W 19 20 25 -5 17
12 Eskilstuna United 20 18 25 -7 27
13 Norrköping W 20 17 35 -18 16
14 Uppsala W 20 14 64 -50 6
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Hammarby 20 2.9 2.2 +0.7 50
2 AIK 20 2.2 2.9 -0.7 34
3 Häcken 20 — — — 55
4 Malmö FF W 19 — — — 36
5 Kristianstad 20 — — — 29
6 Vittsjö 20 — — — 29
7 Eskilstuna United 20 — — — 27
8 Brommapojkarna W 19 — — — 26
9 Piteå W 19 — — — 23
10 Djurgården 20 — — — 21
11 Växjö 20 — — — 18
12 Rosengård W 19 — — — 17
13 Norrköping W 20 — — — 16
14 Uppsala W 20 — — — 6