AI correctly predicted the IFK Goteborg win.
The match finished 2–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 IFK Goteborg IFK Goteborg ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 3-1, 2-1, 3-0, 2-0, 4-1 2-1 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IFK Goteborg | 68.4% | 48.6% | +19.8 pp | Model Edge |
| Draw | 18.0% | 24.5% | -6.5 pp | Market Higher |
| IF Brommapojkarna | 13.7% | 26.9% | -13.2 pp | Market Higher |
The statistical model estimates IFK Goteborg's win probability at 68.4%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 48.6%, a difference of 19.8 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (IFK Goteborg win 2–1).
Market Assessment
The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on IFK Goteborg.
- The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 4.15) — 3 goals materialised
- IFK Goteborg attacking xG significantly stronger (3.05 vs 1.10)
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced IFK Goteborg more conservatively (48.6% vs model 68.4%, 19.8 pp), but the model's lean was validated (IFK Goteborg win 2–1).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Jul 17, 2026 · 19:37 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · IFK Goteborg 68.4% · Draw 18.0% · IF Brommapojkarna 13.6%
- xG · IFK Goteborg 3.05 — IF Brommapojkarna 1.10
-
Jul 17, 2026 · 16:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · IFK Goteborg 1.97 · Draw 3.91 · IF Brommapojkarna 3.56
- Implied 1X2 · IFK Goteborg 48.6% · Draw 24.5% · IF Brommapojkarna 26.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 17, 2026 · 16:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · IFK Goteborg 1.97 · Draw 3.91 · IF Brommapojkarna 3.56
- Implied 1X2 · IFK Goteborg 48.6% · Draw 24.5% · IF Brommapojkarna 26.9%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jul 17, 2026 · 17:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result IFK Goteborg win · 2–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (20 pp)
- High xG deviation from league baseline (126%+)
- Strong model lean
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotProbability Calibration
- Expected: 68.4%
- Historical Bucket: 65–70% — Building sample
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for IFK Goteborg & IF Brommapojkarna!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Allsvenskan — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sirius | 22 | 16 | 3 | 3 | 51 |
| 2 | Hammarby FF | 22 | 13 | 4 | 5 | 43 |
| 3 | Djurgardens IF | 22 | 13 | 2 | 7 | 41 |
| 4 | IF Elfsborg | 22 | 10 | 7 | 5 | 37 |
| 5 | BK Hacken | 22 | 9 | 9 | 4 | 36 |
| 6 | Vasteras SK FK | 22 | 10 | 5 | 7 | 35 |
| 7 | Malmo FF | 22 | 10 | 3 | 9 | 33 |
| 8 | AIK Stockholm | 22 | 9 | 6 | 7 | 33 |
| 9 | IFK Goteborg | 22 | 9 | 5 | 8 | 32 |
| 10 | Gais | 22 | 8 | 6 | 8 | 30 |
| 11 | IF Brommapojkarna | 22 | 7 | 6 | 9 | 27 |
| 12 | Mjallby AIF | 22 | 5 | 7 | 10 | 22 |
| 13 | Kalmar FF | 22 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 19 |
| 14 | Degerfors IF | 22 | 5 | 4 | 13 | 19 |
| 15 | Orgryte IS | 22 | 3 | 6 | 13 | 15 |
| 16 | Halmstad | 22 | 3 | 5 | 14 | 14 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sirius | 22 | 52 | 28 | +24 | 51 |
| 2 | Hammarby FF | 22 | 49 | 20 | +29 | 43 |
| 3 | Djurgardens IF | 22 | 47 | 21 | +26 | 41 |
| 4 | BK Hacken | 22 | 39 | 30 | +9 | 36 |
| 5 | Malmo FF | 22 | 37 | 33 | +4 | 33 |
| 6 | Vasteras SK FK | 22 | 34 | 35 | -1 | 35 |
| 7 | IF Elfsborg | 22 | 31 | 22 | +9 | 37 |
| 8 | AIK Stockholm | 22 | 31 | 34 | -3 | 33 |
| 9 | IFK Goteborg | 22 | 31 | 41 | -10 | 32 |
| 10 | IF Brommapojkarna | 22 | 30 | 36 | -6 | 27 |
| 11 | Gais | 22 | 28 | 20 | +8 | 30 |
| 12 | Mjallby AIF | 22 | 27 | 38 | -11 | 22 |
| 13 | Orgryte IS | 22 | 25 | 49 | -24 | 15 |
| 14 | Kalmar FF | 22 | 21 | 36 | -15 | 19 |
| 15 | Degerfors IF | 22 | 19 | 34 | -15 | 19 |
| 16 | Halmstad | 22 | 16 | 40 | -24 | 14 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kalmar FF | 22 | 1.6 | 0.5 | +1.1 | 19 |
| 2 | IFK Goteborg | 22 | 1.9 | 0.9 | +1.0 | 32 |
| 3 | Malmo FF | 22 | 1.3 | 0.6 | +0.7 | 33 |
| 4 | AIK Stockholm | 22 | 3.8 | 3.2 | +0.6 | 33 |
| 5 | Djurgardens IF | 22 | 0.5 | 1.6 | -1.1 | 41 |
| 6 | Mjallby AIF | 22 | 2.8 | 5.1 | -2.3 | 22 |
| 7 | Sirius | 22 | — | — | — | 51 |
| 8 | Hammarby FF | 22 | — | — | — | 43 |
| 9 | IF Elfsborg | 22 | — | — | — | 37 |
| 10 | BK Hacken | 22 | — | — | — | 36 |
| 11 | Vasteras SK FK | 22 | — | — | — | 35 |
| 12 | Gais | 22 | — | — | — | 30 |
| 13 | IF Brommapojkarna | 22 | — | — | — | 27 |
| 14 | Degerfors IF | 22 | — | — | — | 19 |
| 15 | Orgryte IS | 22 | — | — | — | 15 |
| 16 | Halmstad | 22 | — | — | — | 14 |