Prediction Audit: NY Cosmos vs Boise Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

NY Cosmos

Jul 25, 2026 - 23:00

1 1.32

2 1.28

xG Accuracy: 75%

⚽

Boise

The model missed the final outcome (Boise win 1–2).

The model had projected NY Cosmos at 36.1%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
1X2 New York Cosmos Boise ✖ Incorrect
Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 2-1, 1-2 1-2 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Outcome	Model	Closing Market	Difference	Signal
NY Cosmos	36.1%	23.6%	+12.5 pp	Model Edge
Draw	29.6%	24.0%	+5.6 pp	Model Higher
Boise	34.2%	52.4%	-18.2 pp	Market Higher

The closing market estimates Boise's win probability at 52.4%, compared with the model's estimate of 34.2%, a difference of 18.2 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Boise win 1–2.

Market Assessment

The market is materially more optimistic about Boise than the current fair estimate.

Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.

Post Match Insights

What worked

Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
Exact score 1–2 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
1X2: model leaned New York Cosmos; match finished Boise

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on NY Cosmos by 18.2 percentage points (54.3% vs model 36.1%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

Jul 25, 2026 · 23:43 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · NY Cosmos 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Boise 34.2%
- xG · NY Cosmos 1.32 — Boise 1.28
Jul 25, 2026 · 22:30 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · NY Cosmos 3.89 · Draw 3.82 · Boise 1.75
- Implied 1X2 · NY Cosmos 23.6% · Draw 24.0% · Boise 52.4%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
Jul 25, 2026 · 23:01 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · NY Cosmos 3.89 · Draw 3.82 · Boise 1.75
- Implied 1X2 · NY Cosmos 23.6% · Draw 24.0% · Boise 52.4%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
Jul 25, 2026 · 23:00 UTC Kickoff
FT Full-time result Boise win · 1–2
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Monitor

Historical Decision Monitor

Outcome Missed

Pre-match metrics (historical context)

Prediction Reliability 54/100 · Moderate

Validation: Warning
Large market gap (18 pp)

Evidence ★★★★★

No strong statistical edge
Pricing remains divergent
Validation warning

Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 3/100

Monitoring Confidence 19/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 23, 2026 · 14:11 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1457098

Closing Odds 1.75

AI Fair Odds —

CLV Pending

Final Result Boise win · NY Cosmos 1–2 Boise

Prediction ✖ Missed

Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?: This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?: xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?: Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?: Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

League: USL League One
Fixture: New York Cosmos vs Boise
Kickoff: 2026-07-25 23:00:00
1X2 (model): Home 36.1% · Draw 29.7% · Away 34.2%
xG (showing): New York Cosmos 1.32 — Boise 1.28 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 51.8% · Over 2.5 48.2%); BTTS Yes (Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS Yes
BTTS (model): Yes 54.5% · No 45.5%
Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (12.5%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Monitor

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming USL League One Matches Track NY Cosmos Next Match Prediction Track Boise Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for NY Cosmos & Boise!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Predictions

USL League One — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Union Omaha	28	18	4	6	58
2	Charlotte Independence	28	17	6	5	57
3	Forward Madison	28	15	6	7	51
4	One Knoxville	27	13	8	6	47
5	Boise	27	13	7	7	46
6	Chattanooga Red Wolves	26	13	4	9	43
7	Spokane Velocity	25	13	4	8	43
8	Fort Wayne	27	10	8	9	38
9	Sarasota Paradise	27	9	6	12	33
10	Corpus Christi	26	8	9	9	33
11	Alta	28	8	8	12	32
12	Portland Hearts of Pine	28	7	9	12	30
13	Westchester SC	27	8	5	14	29
14	Naples	26	8	4	14	28
15	Greenville Triumph	26	6	5	15	23
16	NY Cosmos	26	6	4	16	22
17	Richmond Kickers	26	5	5	16	20
18	Tormenta	0	0	0	0	0

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Charlotte Independence	28	64	40	+24	57
2	Forward Madison	28	50	27	+23	51
3	Union Omaha	28	50	30	+20	58
4	Chattanooga Red Wolves	26	47	38	+9	43
5	Westchester SC	27	46	45	+1	29
6	One Knoxville	27	44	31	+13	47
7	Boise	27	43	37	+6	46
8	Fort Wayne	27	42	36	+6	38
9	Portland Hearts of Pine	28	40	50	-10	30
10	Spokane Velocity	25	37	33	+4	43
11	Sarasota Paradise	27	37	40	-3	33
12	Alta	28	34	40	-6	32
13	NY Cosmos	26	32	52	-20	22
14	Corpus Christi	26	30	36	-6	33
15	Naples	26	29	43	-14	28
16	Greenville Triumph	26	29	48	-19	23
17	Richmond Kickers	26	25	53	-28	20
18	Tormenta	0	0	0	0	0