Predictions / Football / USA. USL League One / Boise vs Portland Hearts of Pine

Prediction Audit: Boise vs Portland Hearts of Pine Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Jul 18, 2026 - 01:30
2 1.26
1 1.34
xG Accuracy: 74%

AI correctly predicted the Boise win.

The match finished 2–1, validating the model's directional assessment.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade B-

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Boise Boise ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 2-1 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Boise higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Boise -17.6 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Boise 40.0% 57.6% -17.6 pp Market Higher
Draw 28.3% 22.7% +5.7 pp Model Higher
Portland Hearts of Pine 31.7% 19.8% +11.9 pp Model Edge

The closing market estimates Boise's win probability at 57.6%, compared with the model's estimate of 40.0%, a difference of 17.6 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Boise win 2–1).

Market Assessment

The market is materially more optimistic about Boise than the current fair estimate.

  • Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
  • Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.60) — 3 goals materialised
  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
  • Exact score 2–1 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)

Market lesson

Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Boise higher (57.6% vs model 40.0%, 17.6 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Boise win 2–1).

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Jul 18, 2026 · 19:18 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Boise 40.0% · Draw 28.3% · Portland Hearts of Pine 31.6%
    • xG · Boise 1.26 — Portland Hearts of Pine 1.34
  2. Jul 18, 2026 · 00:59 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Boise 1.61 · Draw 4.09 · Portland Hearts of Pine 4.69
    • Implied 1X2 · Boise 57.6% · Draw 22.7% · Portland Hearts of Pine 19.8%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Jul 18, 2026 · 01:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Boise 1.61 · Draw 4.09 · Portland Hearts of Pine 4.69
    • Implied 1X2 · Boise 57.6% · Draw 22.7% · Portland Hearts of Pine 19.8%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Jul 18, 2026 · 01:30 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Boise win · 2–1
  6. FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Monitor
Historical Decision Monitor
Outcome Validated
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 54/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (18 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Pricing remains divergent
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 12/100
Betting Confidence 43/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 24, 2026 · 14:47 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1607641

Closing Odds 1.61
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Boise win · Boise 2–1 Portland Hearts of Pine
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: USL League One
  • Fixture: Boise vs Portland Hearts of Pine
  • Kickoff: 2026-07-18 01:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 45.0% · Draw 45.0% · Away 10.0%
  • xG (showing): Boise 1.26 — Portland Hearts of Pine 1.34 (total xG ≈ 2.6)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): See the Over/Under and BTTS cards for any directional lean text.
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Monitor

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 01, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Boise & Portland Hearts of Pine!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
USL League One USL League One — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Union Omaha 28 18 4 6 58
2 Charlotte Independence 28 17 6 5 57
3 Forward Madison 28 15 6 7 51
4 One Knoxville 27 13 8 6 47
5 Boise 27 13 7 7 46
6 Chattanooga Red Wolves 26 13 4 9 43
7 Spokane Velocity 25 13 4 8 43
8 Fort Wayne 27 10 8 9 38
9 Sarasota Paradise 27 9 6 12 33
10 Corpus Christi 26 8 9 9 33
11 Alta 28 8 8 12 32
12 Portland Hearts of Pine 28 7 9 12 30
13 Westchester SC 27 8 5 14 29
14 Naples 26 8 4 14 28
15 Greenville Triumph 26 6 5 15 23
16 NY Cosmos 26 6 4 16 22
17 Richmond Kickers 26 5 5 16 20
18 Tormenta 0 0 0 0 0
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Charlotte Independence 28 64 40 +24 57
2 Forward Madison 28 50 27 +23 51
3 Union Omaha 28 50 30 +20 58
4 Chattanooga Red Wolves 26 47 38 +9 43
5 Westchester SC 27 46 45 +1 29
6 One Knoxville 27 44 31 +13 47
7 Boise 27 43 37 +6 46
8 Fort Wayne 27 42 36 +6 38
9 Portland Hearts of Pine 28 40 50 -10 30
10 Spokane Velocity 25 37 33 +4 43
11 Sarasota Paradise 27 37 40 -3 33
12 Alta 28 34 40 -6 32
13 NY Cosmos 26 32 52 -20 22
14 Corpus Christi 26 30 36 -6 33
15 Naples 26 29 43 -14 28
16 Greenville Triumph 26 29 48 -19 23
17 Richmond Kickers 26 25 53 -28 20
18 Tormenta 0 0 0 0 0