Prediction Audit: Aldosivi vs Banfield Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Aldosivi

Sep 05, 2026 - 16:30

3 1.38

1 1.41

xG Accuracy: 57%

Banfield

The model missed the final outcome (Aldosivi win 3–1).

The model had projected Banfield at 36.5%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade C

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

Market Prediction Result Outcome
Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✔ Correct
Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
1X2 Banfield Aldosivi ✖ Incorrect
Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-0, 1-2, 2-1 3-1 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Outcome	Model	Closing Market	Difference	Signal
Aldosivi	35.1%	36.1%	-1.1 pp	Aligned
Draw	28.4%	32.2%	-3.8 pp	Aligned
Banfield	36.5%	31.7%	+4.8 pp	Aligned

The model and closing market are broadly aligned, with probability differences below 5 percentage points.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Aldosivi win 3–1.

Market Assessment

The market and model are broadly aligned. Any small pricing gap likely reflects rounding or bookmaker margin, not a structural disagreement.

Current pricing remains close to the model baseline.

Post Match Insights

What worked

Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.79) — 4 goals materialised
Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile

What failed

1X2: model leaned Banfield; match finished Aldosivi
Exact score: outside the model's top score bins

Market lesson

The full-time result was Aldosivi win 3–1, which did not match the model's pre-match lean on 1X2.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

Sep 05, 2026 · 19:50 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Aldosivi 35.1% · Draw 28.4% · Banfield 36.5%
- xG · Aldosivi 1.38 — Banfield 1.41
Sep 05, 2026 · 16:01 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Aldosivi 2.68 · Draw 3.01 · Banfield 3.06
- Implied 1X2 · Aldosivi 36.1% · Draw 32.2% · Banfield 31.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
Sep 05, 2026 · 16:30 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Aldosivi 2.68 · Draw 3.01 · Banfield 3.06
- Implied 1X2 · Aldosivi 36.1% · Draw 32.2% · Banfield 31.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
Sep 05, 2026 · 16:30 UTC Kickoff
FT Full-time result Aldosivi win · 3–1
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Monitor

Historical Decision Monitor

Outcome Missed

Pre-match metrics (historical context)

Prediction Reliability 77/100 · High

Validation: Pass

Evidence ★★★★★

No strong statistical edge
Direction agrees with model lean
Validation passed

Market Compatibility 26/100

Monitoring Confidence 34/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 31, 2026 · 08:19 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-6373376

Closing Odds 3.06

AI Fair Odds —

CLV Pending

Final Result Aldosivi win · Aldosivi 3–1 Banfield

Prediction ✖ Missed

Decision Grade C

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?: This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?: xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?: Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?: Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

League: Liga Profesional Argentina
Fixture: Aldosivi vs Banfield
Kickoff: 2026-09-05 16:30:00
1X2 (model): Home 10.0% · Draw 45.0% · Away 45.0%
xG (showing): Aldosivi 1.38 — Banfield 1.41 (total xG ≈ 2.79)
Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
Structural leans (not bets): See the Over/Under and BTTS cards for any directional lean text.
BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
Correct score (top bin): N/A

When book depth is thin or odds are missing, EV may be unavailable even though the model still prefers one side on totals or BTTS — wait for cleaner prices or skip.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Monitor

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 29, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming Liga Profesional Argentina Matches Track Aldosivi Next Match Prediction Track Banfield Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Explore More Predictions Content

Get Premium Predictions for Aldosivi & Banfield!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now

Back to Predictions

Liga Profesional Argentina — Standings

#	TEAM	MP	W	D	L	PTS
1	Estudiantes L.P.	16	9	4	3	31
2	Boca Juniors	16	8	6	2	30
3	Velez Sarsfield	16	7	7	2	28
4	Talleres Cordoba	16	7	5	4	26
5	Independiente	16	6	6	4	24
6	Lanus	16	6	6	4	24
7	San Lorenzo	16	5	7	4	22
8	Union Santa Fe	16	5	6	5	21
9	Instituto Cordoba	16	6	3	7	21
10	Defensa Y Justicia	16	4	7	5	19
11	Gimnasia M.	16	5	4	7	19
12	Platense	16	3	7	6	16
13	Central Cordoba de Santiago	16	4	4	8	16
14	Newells Old Boys	16	3	6	7	15
15	Deportivo Riestra	16	1	8	7	11

#	TEAM	MP	GS	GC	+/-	PTS
1	Independiente	16	24	20	+4	24
2	Union Santa Fe	16	24	20	+4	21
3	Boca Juniors	16	22	9	+13	30
4	Estudiantes L.P.	16	19	7	+12	31
5	Velez Sarsfield	16	18	12	+6	28
6	Lanus	16	18	15	+3	24
7	Defensa Y Justicia	16	18	21	-3	19
8	Talleres Cordoba	16	17	13	+4	26
9	Instituto Cordoba	16	17	17	0	21
10	Newells Old Boys	16	15	27	-12	15
11	San Lorenzo	16	14	14	0	22
12	Gimnasia M.	16	14	22	-8	19
13	Central Cordoba de Santiago	16	11	21	-10	16
14	Platense	16	10	15	-5	16
15	Deportivo Riestra	16	5	12	-7	11

#	TEAM	MP	xG	xGC	+/-	PTS
1	Instituto Cordoba	16	14.2	5.0	+9.2	21
2	Defensa Y Justicia	16	11.9	8.5	+3.4	19
3	Lanus	16	12.8	9.6	+3.2	24
4	Boca Juniors	16	9.2	6.0	+3.2	30
5	Union Santa Fe	16	9.1	6.2	+2.9	21
6	Deportivo Riestra	16	9.7	7.2	+2.5	11
7	Estudiantes L.P.	16	12.1	9.8	+2.3	31
8	Gimnasia M.	16	8.7	8.6	+0.1	19
9	Independiente	16	8.1	9.1	-1.0	24
10	Talleres Cordoba	16	10.4	13.0	-2.6	26
11	Newells Old Boys	16	5.1	8.3	-3.2	15
12	Central Cordoba de Santiago	16	9.4	13.1	-3.7	16
13	Platense	16	6.3	10.2	-3.9	16
14	San Lorenzo	16	4.8	8.7	-3.9	22
15	Velez Sarsfield	16	6.1	10.1	-4.0	28