AI correctly predicted the Chonburi FC win.
The match finished 2–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Chonburi FC Chonburi FC ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-0, 1-1, 0-0, 2-0, 0-1 2-1 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chonburi FC | 48.5% | 48.3% | +0.2 pp | Aligned |
| Draw | 30.5% | 23.4% | +7.0 pp | Model Higher |
| Nakhon Ratchasima FC | 21.0% | 28.3% | -7.2 pp | Market Higher |
The closing market estimates Nakhon Ratchasima FC's win probability at 28.3%, compared with the model's estimate of 21.0%, a difference of 7.2 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Chonburi FC win 2–1).
Market Assessment
The market and model broadly agree on Nakhon Ratchasima FC. The remaining divergence may reflect differences in team-strength assumptions rather than a directional disagreement.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Chonburi FC attacking xG significantly stronger (1.41 vs 0.85)
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Chonburi FC higher (55.7% vs model 48.5%, 7.2 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Chonburi FC win 2–1).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
May 10, 2026 · 10:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Chonburi FC 48.5% · Draw 30.5% · Nakhon Ratchasima FC 21.0%
- xG · Chonburi FC 1.41 — Nakhon Ratchasima FC 0.85
-
May 10, 2026 · 10:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Chonburi FC 1.93 · Draw 3.98 · Nakhon Ratchasima FC 3.30
- Implied 1X2 · Chonburi FC 48.3% · Draw 23.4% · Nakhon Ratchasima FC 28.3%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 10, 2026 · 10:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Chonburi FC 1.93 · Draw 3.98 · Nakhon Ratchasima FC 3.30
- Implied 1X2 · Chonburi FC 48.3% · Draw 23.4% · Nakhon Ratchasima FC 28.3%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 10, 2026 · 11:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Chonburi FC win · 2–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- No strong statistical edge
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Chonburi FC & Nakhon Ratchasima FC!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Thai League 1 — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buriram United | 30 | 22 | 4 | 4 | 70 |
| 2 | Port FC | 30 | 18 | 6 | 6 | 60 |
| 3 | Ratchaburi | 30 | 18 | 5 | 7 | 59 |
| 4 | Bangkok Glass | 30 | 14 | 10 | 6 | 52 |
| 5 | Bangkok United | 30 | 13 | 11 | 6 | 50 |
| 6 | Prachuap | 30 | 11 | 12 | 7 | 45 |
| 7 | Chiangrai United | 30 | 9 | 13 | 8 | 40 |
| 8 | Chonburi FC | 30 | 10 | 9 | 11 | 39 |
| 9 | Rayong FC | 30 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 37 |
| 10 | Ayutthaya FC | 30 | 8 | 8 | 14 | 32 |
| 11 | Uthai Thani | 30 | 7 | 10 | 13 | 31 |
| 12 | Lamphun Warrior | 30 | 4 | 17 | 9 | 29 |
| 13 | Sukhothai FC | 30 | 6 | 10 | 14 | 28 |
| 14 | Muangthong United | 30 | 6 | 8 | 16 | 26 |
| 15 | Nakhon Ratchasima FC | 30 | 6 | 6 | 18 | 24 |
| 16 | Kanchanaburi | 30 | 4 | 11 | 15 | 23 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buriram United | 30 | 76 | 31 | +45 | 70 |
| 2 | Port FC | 30 | 59 | 23 | +36 | 60 |
| 3 | Ratchaburi | 30 | 55 | 30 | +25 | 59 |
| 4 | Bangkok Glass | 30 | 45 | 29 | +16 | 52 |
| 5 | Rayong FC | 30 | 44 | 49 | -5 | 37 |
| 6 | Bangkok United | 30 | 43 | 32 | +11 | 50 |
| 7 | Prachuap | 30 | 39 | 37 | +2 | 45 |
| 8 | Uthai Thani | 30 | 39 | 44 | -5 | 31 |
| 9 | Chonburi FC | 30 | 38 | 41 | -3 | 39 |
| 10 | Chiangrai United | 30 | 36 | 37 | -1 | 40 |
| 11 | Lamphun Warrior | 30 | 35 | 47 | -12 | 29 |
| 12 | Ayutthaya FC | 30 | 34 | 50 | -16 | 32 |
| 13 | Kanchanaburi | 30 | 29 | 54 | -25 | 23 |
| 14 | Muangthong United | 30 | 27 | 52 | -25 | 26 |
| 15 | Sukhothai FC | 30 | 23 | 42 | -19 | 28 |
| 16 | Nakhon Ratchasima FC | 30 | 20 | 44 | -24 | 24 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Buriram United | 30 | 13.4 | 6.1 | +7.3 | 70 |
| 2 | Bangkok United | 30 | 13.3 | 7.2 | +6.1 | 50 |
| 3 | Port FC | 30 | 12.0 | 8.3 | +3.7 | 60 |
| 4 | Prachuap | 30 | 10.3 | 6.6 | +3.7 | 45 |
| 5 | Ayutthaya FC | 30 | 10.3 | 7.9 | +2.4 | 32 |
| 6 | Rayong FC | 30 | 9.8 | 7.8 | +2.0 | 37 |
| 7 | Muangthong United | 30 | 10.3 | 9.8 | +0.5 | 26 |
| 8 | Chonburi FC | 30 | 8.9 | 10.1 | -1.2 | 39 |
| 9 | Ratchaburi | 30 | 10.8 | 12.2 | -1.4 | 59 |
| 10 | Lamphun Warrior | 30 | 9.5 | 11.1 | -1.6 | 29 |
| 11 | Uthai Thani | 30 | 9.0 | 10.8 | -1.8 | 31 |
| 12 | Bangkok Glass | 30 | 8.1 | 9.9 | -1.8 | 52 |
| 13 | Kanchanaburi | 30 | 9.0 | 12.2 | -3.2 | 23 |
| 14 | Chiangrai United | 30 | 8.4 | 11.8 | -3.4 | 40 |
| 15 | Sukhothai FC | 30 | 7.8 | 13.3 | -5.5 | 28 |
| 16 | Nakhon Ratchasima FC | 30 | 6.5 | 12.2 | -5.7 | 24 |