Prediction Audit: FC Dallas vs Austin Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Sep 20, 2026 - 00:30
0 1.17
0 1.11
xG Accuracy: 53%

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 0–0).

The model had projected FC Dallas at 35.5%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade C

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (0 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 FC Dallas Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 0-1, 0-0, 2-1 0-0 ✔ Correct

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices FC Dallas higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: FC Dallas -20.9 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
FC Dallas 35.5% 56.4% -20.9 pp Market Higher
Draw 31.9% 22.3% +9.6 pp Model Higher
Austin 32.5% 21.2% +11.3 pp Model Edge

The closing market estimates FC Dallas's win probability at 56.4%, compared with the model's estimate of 35.5%, a difference of 20.9 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Draw 0–0.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Both Teams To Score (No) matched the full-time result
  • Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
  • Exact score 0–0 fell within the model's highlighted bins

What failed

  • 1X2: model leaned FC Dallas; match finished Draw

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on FC Dallas by 20.9 percentage points (56.4% vs model 35.5%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. Sep 20, 2026 · 19:06 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · FC Dallas 35.5% · Draw 31.9% · Austin 32.6%
    • xG · FC Dallas 1.17 — Austin 1.11
  2. Sep 20, 2026 · 00:20 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE10
    • 1X2 odds · FC Dallas 1.71 · Draw 4.32 · Austin 4.54
    • Implied 1X2 · FC Dallas 56.4% · Draw 22.3% · Austin 21.2%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. Sep 20, 2026 · 00:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · FC Dallas 1.71 · Draw 4.32 · Austin 4.54
    • Implied 1X2 · FC Dallas 56.4% · Draw 22.3% · Austin 21.2%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. Sep 20, 2026 · 00:30 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 0–0
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 53/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (21 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Pricing remains divergent
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Betting Confidence 34/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Sep 14, 2026 · 00:49 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-8655997

Closing Odds 1.71
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · FC Dallas 0–0 Austin
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade C

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: Major League Soccer
  • Fixture: FC Dallas vs Austin
  • Kickoff: 2026-09-20 00:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 45.0% · Draw 45.0% · Away 10.0%
  • xG (showing): FC Dallas 1.17 — Austin 1.11 (total xG ≈ 2.28)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): See the Over/Under and BTTS cards for any directional lean text.
  • BTTS (model): Yes N/A · No N/A
  • Correct score (top bin): N/A

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

September 28, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for FC Dallas & Austin!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Major League Soccer Major League Soccer — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Vancouver Whitecaps 25 15 4 6 49
2 Houston Dynamo 26 13 5 8 44
3 St. Louis City 26 12 8 6 44
4 FC Dallas 26 12 8 6 44
5 San Jose Earthquakes 26 12 6 8 42
6 Los Angeles FC 27 11 8 8 41
7 Colorado Rapids 26 11 3 12 36
8 Los Angeles Galaxy 27 8 9 10 33
9 Portland Timbers 26 9 5 12 32
10 Seattle Sounders 25 8 8 9 32
11 San Diego 26 8 7 11 31
12 Austin 26 7 9 10 30
13 Real Salt Lake 26 8 5 13 29
14 Minnesota United FC 26 7 8 11 29
15 Sporting Kansas City 25 5 3 17 18
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Vancouver Whitecaps 25 56 23 +33 49
2 FC Dallas 26 49 42 +7 44
3 Portland Timbers 26 47 48 -1 32
4 San Jose Earthquakes 26 46 38 +8 42
5 St. Louis City 26 45 36 +9 44
6 San Diego 26 44 44 0 31
7 Los Angeles FC 27 43 29 +14 41
8 Minnesota United FC 26 39 46 -7 29
9 Real Salt Lake 26 37 44 -7 29
10 Colorado Rapids 26 36 35 +1 36
11 Houston Dynamo 26 34 30 +4 44
12 Los Angeles Galaxy 27 34 42 -8 33
13 Austin 26 32 44 -12 30
14 Seattle Sounders 25 30 33 -3 32
15 Sporting Kansas City 25 29 63 -34 18
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Vancouver Whitecaps 25 15.4 7.0 +8.4 49
2 St. Louis City 26 16.2 8.0 +8.2 44
3 Colorado Rapids 26 12.7 7.5 +5.2 36
4 Portland Timbers 26 19.0 14.2 +4.8 32
5 Minnesota United FC 26 17.8 13.3 +4.5 29
6 San Diego 26 14.7 12.0 +2.7 31
7 San Jose Earthquakes 26 13.6 13.1 +0.5 42
8 Houston Dynamo 26 11.6 11.1 +0.5 44
9 Los Angeles FC 27 14.5 15.8 -1.3 41
10 FC Dallas 26 10.4 11.7 -1.3 44
11 Austin 26 9.5 13.7 -4.2 30
12 Seattle Sounders 25 10.6 15.4 -4.8 32
13 Real Salt Lake 26 14.2 19.2 -5.0 29
14 Sporting Kansas City 25 9.8 18.2 -8.4 18
15 Los Angeles Galaxy 27 11.2 21.1 -9.9 33