AI correctly predicted the New England Revolution win.
The match finished 1–2, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 New England Revolution New England Revolution ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-2, 0-1, 0-2, 2-1 1-2 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York City FC | 23.2% | 37.8% | -14.5 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 26.1% | 26.6% | -0.5 pp | Aligned |
| New England Revolution | 50.7% | 35.7% | +15.1 pp | Model Edge |
The statistical model estimates New England Revolution's win probability at 50.7%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 35.7%, a difference of 15.1 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (New England Revolution win 1–2).
Market Assessment
The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on New England Revolution.
- The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.95) — 3 goals materialised
- New England Revolution attacking xG significantly stronger (1.79 vs 1.16)
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced New England Revolution more conservatively (35.7% vs model 50.7%, 15.1 pp), but the model's lean was validated (New England Revolution win 1–2).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Sep 10, 2026 · 19:06 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · New York City FC 23.2% · Draw 26.0% · New England Revolution 50.7%
- xG · New York City FC 1.16 — New England Revolution 1.79
-
Sep 09, 2026 · 23:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · New York City FC 2.56 · Draw 3.64 · New England Revolution 2.71
- Implied 1X2 · New York City FC 37.8% · Draw 26.6% · New England Revolution 35.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 09, 2026 · 23:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · New York City FC 2.56 · Draw 3.64 · New England Revolution 2.71
- Implied 1X2 · New York City FC 37.8% · Draw 26.6% · New England Revolution 35.7%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Sep 10, 2026 · 00:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result New England Revolution win · 1–2
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (15 pp)
- Statistical edge detected
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for New York City FC & New England Revolution!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Major League Soccer — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | 26 | 15 | 5 | 6 | 50 |
| 2 | FC Dallas | 27 | 13 | 8 | 6 | 47 |
| 3 | San Jose Earthquakes | 27 | 13 | 6 | 8 | 45 |
| 4 | Houston Dynamo | 27 | 13 | 5 | 9 | 44 |
| 5 | St. Louis City | 26 | 12 | 8 | 6 | 44 |
| 6 | Los Angeles FC | 28 | 11 | 8 | 9 | 41 |
| 7 | Colorado Rapids | 27 | 11 | 3 | 13 | 36 |
| 8 | Los Angeles Galaxy | 28 | 9 | 9 | 10 | 36 |
| 9 | Seattle Sounders | 26 | 9 | 8 | 9 | 35 |
| 10 | Portland Timbers | 27 | 9 | 5 | 13 | 32 |
| 11 | Real Salt Lake | 27 | 9 | 5 | 13 | 32 |
| 12 | San Diego | 27 | 8 | 8 | 11 | 32 |
| 13 | Austin | 27 | 7 | 10 | 10 | 31 |
| 14 | Minnesota United FC | 27 | 7 | 8 | 12 | 29 |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | 26 | 6 | 3 | 17 | 21 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | 26 | 59 | 26 | +33 | 50 |
| 2 | FC Dallas | 27 | 50 | 42 | +8 | 47 |
| 3 | San Jose Earthquakes | 27 | 49 | 39 | +10 | 45 |
| 4 | Portland Timbers | 27 | 48 | 51 | -3 | 32 |
| 5 | San Diego | 27 | 47 | 47 | 0 | 32 |
| 6 | St. Louis City | 26 | 45 | 36 | +9 | 44 |
| 7 | Los Angeles FC | 28 | 43 | 30 | +13 | 41 |
| 8 | Real Salt Lake | 27 | 40 | 44 | -4 | 32 |
| 9 | Minnesota United FC | 27 | 40 | 49 | -9 | 29 |
| 10 | Colorado Rapids | 27 | 38 | 38 | 0 | 36 |
| 11 | Los Angeles Galaxy | 28 | 37 | 44 | -7 | 36 |
| 12 | Austin | 27 | 35 | 47 | -12 | 31 |
| 13 | Houston Dynamo | 27 | 34 | 32 | +2 | 44 |
| 14 | Seattle Sounders | 26 | 33 | 34 | -1 | 35 |
| 15 | Sporting Kansas City | 26 | 31 | 63 | -32 | 21 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Vancouver Whitecaps | 26 | 15.4 | 7.0 | +8.4 | 50 |
| 2 | St. Louis City | 26 | 16.2 | 8.0 | +8.2 | 44 |
| 3 | Colorado Rapids | 27 | 12.7 | 7.5 | +5.2 | 36 |
| 4 | Portland Timbers | 27 | 19.0 | 14.2 | +4.8 | 32 |
| 5 | Minnesota United FC | 27 | 17.8 | 13.3 | +4.5 | 29 |
| 6 | San Diego | 27 | 14.7 | 12.0 | +2.7 | 32 |
| 7 | San Jose Earthquakes | 27 | 13.6 | 13.1 | +0.5 | 45 |
| 8 | Houston Dynamo | 27 | 11.6 | 11.1 | +0.5 | 44 |
| 9 | Los Angeles FC | 28 | 14.5 | 15.8 | -1.3 | 41 |
| 10 | FC Dallas | 27 | 10.4 | 11.7 | -1.3 | 47 |
| 11 | Austin | 27 | 9.5 | 13.7 | -4.2 | 31 |
| 12 | Seattle Sounders | 26 | 10.6 | 15.4 | -4.8 | 35 |
| 13 | Real Salt Lake | 27 | 14.2 | 19.2 | -5.0 | 32 |
| 14 | Sporting Kansas City | 26 | 9.8 | 18.2 | -8.4 | 21 |
| 15 | Los Angeles Galaxy | 28 | 11.2 | 21.1 | -9.9 | 36 |