Prediction Audit: Chrudim II vs Hlinsko Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

May 09, 2026 - 15:00
0 1.45
0 1.25
xG Accuracy: 27%

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 0–0).

The model had projected Chrudim II at 41.8%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Under 2.5 (0 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No No ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Chrudim II Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-2, 1-1, 2-2, 2-1, 1-3 0-0 ✖ Incorrect

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Both Teams To Score (No) matched the full-time result

What failed

  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Over 2.5; match finished Under 2.5 (0 goals)
  • 1X2: model leaned Chrudim II; match finished Draw

Market lesson

The full-time result was Draw 0–0, which did not match the model's pre-match lean on 1X2.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. May 03, 2026 · 02:03 UTC Forecast generated
    • xG · Chrudim II 1.45 — Hlinsko 1.25
  2. May 09, 2026 · 15:00 UTC Kickoff
  3. FT Full-time result Draw · 0–0
  4. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  5. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe
Historical Decision No Primary Bet
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 57/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Pending
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Market has already priced much of the edge
  • Validation pending
Market Compatibility 100/100
Betting Confidence 59/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 24, 2026 · 05:14 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1554063

Closing Odds Pending
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · Chrudim II 0–0 Hlinsko
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: 4. liga - Divizie C
  • Fixture: Chrudim II vs Hlinsko
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-09 15:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 45.0% · Draw 45.0% · Away 10.0%
  • xG (showing): Chrudim II 1.45 — Hlinsko 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 28.5% · Over 2.5 71.5%); BTTS No (Yes 48.6% · No 51.4%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 48.6% · No 51.4%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-2 (8.7%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 15, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Chrudim II & Hlinsko!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
4. liga - Divizie C 4. liga - Divizie C — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Čáslav 29 20 3 6 63
2 Horní Ředice 29 19 2 8 59
3 Vysoké Mýto 29 17 7 5 58
4 Přepeře 29 17 3 8 55
5 Turnov 29 15 6 8 51
6 Kosmonosy 29 14 7 8 49
7 Trutnov 29 14 5 10 47
8 Chlumec nad Cidlinou 29 12 5 12 41
9 Spartak Police n/Metují 28 10 8 10 38
10 Hlinsko 28 11 2 14 35
11 Brandýs nad Labem 29 7 13 9 34
12 Chrudim II 29 9 6 14 33
13 Svitavy 29 8 7 14 31
14 Slovan Hrádek nad Nisou 29 6 5 18 23
15 Náchod 29 4 5 20 17
16 Dobrovice 29 4 4 21 16
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Čáslav 29 72 35 +37 63
2 Horní Ředice 29 72 40 +32 59
3 Turnov 29 67 54 +13 51
4 Kosmonosy 29 61 42 +19 49
5 Trutnov 29 61 53 +8 47
6 Hlinsko 28 60 61 -1 35
7 Přepeře 29 58 36 +22 55
8 Vysoké Mýto 29 53 23 +30 58
9 Náchod 29 43 70 -27 17
10 Chlumec nad Cidlinou 29 42 40 +2 41
11 Svitavy 29 42 67 -25 31
12 Brandýs nad Labem 29 41 51 -10 34
13 Chrudim II 29 41 54 -13 33
14 Spartak Police n/Metují 28 39 50 -11 38
15 Dobrovice 29 27 77 -50 16
16 Slovan Hrádek nad Nisou 29 26 49 -23 23