Prediction Audit: Ljutomer vs Videm Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

May 23, 2026 - 15:00
6 1.45
4 1.25
xG Accuracy: 13%

AI correctly predicted the Ljutomer win.

The match finished 6–4, validating the model's directional assessment.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade B-

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (10 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Ljutomer Ljutomer ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 1-2, 1-1, 0-2, 1-3, 0-1 6-4 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Videm higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Videm -22.1 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Ljutomer 41.8% 23.4% +18.3 pp Model Edge
Draw 25.7% 21.9% +3.8 pp Aligned
Videm 32.6% 54.7% -22.1 pp Market Higher

The closing market estimates Videm's win probability at 54.7%, compared with the model's estimate of 32.6%, a difference of 22.1 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE5.

After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Ljutomer win 6–4).

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.70) — 10 goals materialised
  • Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
  • Exact score: outside the model's top score bins

Market lesson

Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Ljutomer higher (63.9% vs model 41.8%, 22.1 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Ljutomer win 6–4).

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. May 23, 2026 · 19:50 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Ljutomer 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Videm 32.6%
    • xG · Ljutomer 1.45 — Videm 1.25
  2. May 23, 2026 · 14:31 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Ljutomer 3.78 · Draw 4.05 · Videm 1.62
    • Implied 1X2 · Ljutomer 23.4% · Draw 21.9% · Videm 54.7%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. May 23, 2026 · 14:57 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE5
    • 1X2 odds · Ljutomer 3.78 · Draw 4.05 · Videm 1.62
    • Implied 1X2 · Ljutomer 23.4% · Draw 21.9% · Videm 54.7%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. May 23, 2026 · 15:00 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Ljutomer win · 6–4
  6. FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Validated
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 52/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (22 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Pricing remains divergent
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Monitoring Confidence 14/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 25, 2026 · 16:27 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1734874

Closing Odds 1.62
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Ljutomer win · Ljutomer 6–4 Videm
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade B-

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: 3. SNL - East
  • Fixture: Ljutomer vs Videm
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-23 15:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
  • xG (showing): Ljutomer 1.45 — Videm 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 33.0% · Over 2.5 67.0%); BTTS Yes (Yes 60.9% · No 39.1%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 60.9% · No 39.1%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-2 (9.6%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

Prefer skipping to over-staking when the engine is honest about missing edge.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 02, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Ljutomer & Videm!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
3. SNL - East 3. SNL - East — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Videm 16 11 4 1 37
2 Brežice 16 8 4 4 28
3 Korotan Prevalje 16 7 5 4 26
4 Zavrč 17 8 2 7 26
5 Podvinci 15 6 5 4 23
6 Hajdina 16 6 5 5 23
7 Fužinar 16 5 6 5 21
8 Rogaška 15 5 6 4 21
9 Čarda Martjanci 15 6 3 6 21
10 Šmartno 16 4 6 6 18
11 Rače 15 3 7 5 16
12 Ljutomer 16 1 7 8 10
13 NŠ Drava 4 1 2 1 5
14 Dobrovce 15 1 2 12 5
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Videm 16 39 16 +23 37
2 Čarda Martjanci 15 27 23 +4 21
3 Fužinar 16 26 18 +8 21
4 Rogaška 15 24 16 +8 21
5 Brežice 16 23 19 +4 28
6 Šmartno 16 22 27 -5 18
7 Korotan Prevalje 16 21 16 +5 26
8 Zavrč 17 21 20 +1 26
9 Hajdina 16 20 21 -1 23
10 Podvinci 15 17 13 +4 23
11 Rače 15 16 18 -2 16
12 Ljutomer 16 14 31 -17 10
13 Dobrovce 15 11 43 -32 5
14 NŠ Drava 4 4 4 0 5