The model missed the final outcome (Draw 2–2).
The model had projected Bratstvo Gračanica at 43.8%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Bratstvo Gračanica Draw ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-0, 2-1, 0-1, 2-0 2-2 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bratstvo Gračanica | 43.8% | 61.6% | -17.8 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 29.2% | 22.1% | +7.1 pp | Model Higher |
| Jedinstvo Bihać | 27.0% | 16.3% | +10.7 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates Bratstvo Gračanica's win probability at 61.6%, compared with the model's estimate of 43.8%, a difference of 17.8 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Draw 2–2.
Market Assessment
The market is materially more optimistic about Bratstvo Gračanica than the current fair estimate.
- Investors may be incorporating information not fully reflected in the baseline model.
- Tournament-specific context can shift market pricing.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.58) — 4 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (4 goals)
- 1X2: model leaned Bratstvo Gračanica; match finished Draw
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Bratstvo Gračanica by 17.8 percentage points (61.6% vs model 43.8%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
Jun 07, 2026 · 18:33 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Bratstvo Gračanica 43.8% · Draw 29.2% · Jedinstvo Bihać 26.9%
- xG · Bratstvo Gračanica 1.47 — Jedinstvo Bihać 1.11
-
Jun 07, 2026 · 15:00 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Bratstvo Gračanica 1.44 · Draw 4.02 · Jedinstvo Bihać 5.44
- Implied 1X2 · Bratstvo Gračanica 61.6% · Draw 22.1% · Jedinstvo Bihać 16.3%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jun 07, 2026 · 15:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Bratstvo Gračanica 1.44 · Draw 4.02 · Jedinstvo Bihać 5.44
- Implied 1X2 · Bratstvo Gračanica 61.6% · Draw 22.1% · Jedinstvo Bihać 16.3%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
Jun 07, 2026 · 15:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Draw · 2–2
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (18 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Pricing remains divergent
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Bratstvo Gračanica & Jedinstvo Bihać!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
1st League - FBiH — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Čelik | 26 | 17 | 8 | 1 | 59 |
| 2 | Stupčanica Olovo | 26 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 41 |
| 3 | Sloboda Tuzla | 26 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 41 |
| 4 | Jedinstvo Bihać | 26 | 12 | 5 | 9 | 41 |
| 5 | GOŠK Gabela | 26 | 11 | 7 | 8 | 40 |
| 6 | Travnik | 26 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 37 |
| 7 | TOŠK Tešanj | 26 | 10 | 7 | 9 | 37 |
| 8 | Radnik Hadžići | 26 | 10 | 6 | 10 | 36 |
| 9 | Tomislav | 26 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 32 |
| 10 | Igman Konjic | 26 | 9 | 5 | 12 | 32 |
| 11 | Budućnost Banovići | 26 | 8 | 7 | 11 | 31 |
| 12 | Bratstvo Gračanica | 26 | 7 | 10 | 9 | 31 |
| 13 | Vitez | 26 | 8 | 4 | 14 | 28 |
| 14 | Tuzla City | 26 | 5 | 2 | 19 | 17 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Čelik | 26 | 52 | 19 | +33 | 59 |
| 2 | Stupčanica Olovo | 26 | 40 | 27 | +13 | 41 |
| 3 | Tomislav | 26 | 38 | 35 | +3 | 32 |
| 4 | GOŠK Gabela | 26 | 36 | 26 | +10 | 40 |
| 5 | Travnik | 26 | 35 | 26 | +9 | 37 |
| 6 | TOŠK Tešanj | 26 | 35 | 30 | +5 | 37 |
| 7 | Sloboda Tuzla | 26 | 34 | 29 | +5 | 41 |
| 8 | Radnik Hadžići | 26 | 34 | 37 | -3 | 36 |
| 9 | Budućnost Banovići | 26 | 31 | 33 | -2 | 31 |
| 10 | Jedinstvo Bihać | 26 | 29 | 36 | -7 | 41 |
| 11 | Igman Konjic | 26 | 29 | 44 | -15 | 32 |
| 12 | Vitez | 26 | 27 | 38 | -11 | 28 |
| 13 | Bratstvo Gračanica | 26 | 26 | 28 | -2 | 31 |
| 14 | Tuzla City | 26 | 20 | 58 | -38 | 17 |