AI correctly predicted the Kortrijk U21 win.
The match finished 5–0, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (5 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Kortrijk U21 Kortrijk U21 ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 2-1, 1-1, 3-1, 2-2, 2-0 5-0 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kortrijk U21 | 41.8% | 70.3% | -28.5 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 25.7% | 16.3% | +9.3 pp | Model Higher |
| Patro Eisden U21 | 32.6% | 13.3% | +19.2 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates Kortrijk U21's win probability at 70.3%, compared with the model's estimate of 41.8%, a difference of 28.5 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Kortrijk U21 win 5–0).
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.70) — 5 goals materialised
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Kortrijk U21 higher (70.3% vs model 41.8%, 28.5 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Kortrijk U21 win 5–0).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
May 08, 2026 · 18:29 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Kortrijk U21 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Patro Eisden U21 32.6%
- xG · Kortrijk U21 1.45 — Patro Eisden U21 1.25
-
May 08, 2026 · 17:59 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Kortrijk U21 1.28 · Draw 5.51 · Patro Eisden U21 6.74
- Implied 1X2 · Kortrijk U21 70.3% · Draw 16.3% · Patro Eisden U21 13.3%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 08, 2026 · 18:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Kortrijk U21 1.28 · Draw 5.51 · Patro Eisden U21 6.74
- Implied 1X2 · Kortrijk U21 70.3% · Draw 16.3% · Patro Eisden U21 13.3%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 08, 2026 · 18:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Kortrijk U21 win · 5–0
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (29 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Market strongly disagrees on price
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Kortrijk U21 & Patro Eisden U21!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Reserve Pro League — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Lommel U21 | 21 | 14 | 5 | 2 | 47 |
| 1 | Patro Eisden U21 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2 | Westerlo U21 | 22 | 15 | 2 | 5 | 47 |
| 3 | Kortrijk U21 | 21 | 13 | 2 | 6 | 41 |
| 3 | Francs Borains U21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | RWDM U21 | 22 | 12 | 5 | 5 | 41 |
| 4 | RAAL La Louviere U21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 5 | RFC Seraing Reserve U21 | 23 | 12 | 4 | 7 | 40 |
| 7 | Waasland-Beveren U21 | 22 | 8 | 5 | 9 | 29 |
| 8 | Lierse K. U21 | 21 | 9 | 1 | 11 | 28 |
| 10 | K. Beerschot V.A. Reserve U21 | 21 | 7 | 2 | 12 | 23 |
| 12 | Sporting Charleroi II | 20 | 4 | 2 | 14 | 14 |
| 13 | RFC de Liege U21 | 21 | 3 | 0 | 18 | 9 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kortrijk U21 | 21 | 66 | 30 | +36 | 41 |
| 2 | RFC Seraing Reserve U21 | 23 | 61 | 36 | +25 | 40 |
| 3 | RWDM U21 | 22 | 50 | 30 | +20 | 41 |
| 4 | Lommel U21 | 21 | 47 | 22 | +25 | 47 |
| 5 | Westerlo U21 | 22 | 46 | 32 | +14 | 47 |
| 6 | Waasland-Beveren U21 | 22 | 44 | 37 | +7 | 29 |
| 7 | K. Beerschot V.A. Reserve U21 | 21 | 43 | 47 | -4 | 23 |
| 8 | Lierse K. U21 | 21 | 40 | 45 | -5 | 28 |
| 9 | Sporting Charleroi II | 20 | 26 | 52 | -26 | 14 |
| 10 | RFC de Liege U21 | 21 | 26 | 81 | -55 | 9 |
| 11 | Patro Eisden U21 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 12 | Francs Borains U21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 13 | RAAL La Louviere U21 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
