AI correctly predicted the Al-Qadisiyah FC win.
The match finished 1–5, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (6 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Al-Qadisiyah FC Al-Qadisiyah FC ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-2, 1-1, 2-2, 1-3, 0-2 1-5 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Al-Ittihad FC | 24.6% | 32.2% | -7.6 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 22.7% | 27.2% | -4.5 pp | Aligned |
| Al-Qadisiyah FC | 52.7% | 40.6% | +12.1 pp | Model Edge |
The statistical model estimates Al-Qadisiyah FC's win probability at 52.7%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 40.6%, a difference of 12.1 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Al-Qadisiyah FC win 1–5).
Market Assessment
The statistical fair estimate is materially higher than the market on Al-Qadisiyah FC.
- The model may see a slower-scoring or closer matchup than the market.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.65) — 6 goals materialised
- Al-Qadisiyah FC attacking xG significantly stronger (2.18 vs 1.47)
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
What failed
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Al-Qadisiyah FC more conservatively (40.6% vs model 52.7%, 12.1 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Al-Qadisiyah FC win 1–5).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
May 21, 2026 · 18:17 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Al-Ittihad FC 24.6% · Draw 22.7% · Al-Qadisiyah FC 52.7%
- xG · Al-Ittihad FC 1.47 — Al-Qadisiyah FC 2.18
-
May 21, 2026 · 16:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Al-Ittihad FC 2.96 · Draw 3.50 · Al-Qadisiyah FC 2.35
- Implied 1X2 · Al-Ittihad FC 32.2% · Draw 27.2% · Al-Qadisiyah FC 40.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 21, 2026 · 16:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Al-Ittihad FC 2.96 · Draw 3.50 · Al-Qadisiyah FC 2.35
- Implied 1X2 · Al-Ittihad FC 32.2% · Draw 27.2% · Al-Qadisiyah FC 40.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 21, 2026 · 18:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Al-Qadisiyah FC win · 1–5
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (12 pp)
- High xG deviation from league baseline (61%+)
- Statistical edge detected
- Market has already priced much of the edge
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotProbability Calibration
- Expected: 52.7%
- Historical Bucket: 50–55% — Building sample
Model Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Al-Ittihad FC & Al-Qadisiyah FC!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Pro League — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al-Nassr | 34 | 28 | 2 | 4 | 86 |
| 2 | Al-Hilal Saudi FC | 34 | 25 | 9 | 0 | 84 |
| 3 | Al-Ahli Jeddah | 34 | 25 | 6 | 3 | 81 |
| 4 | Al-Qadisiyah FC | 34 | 23 | 8 | 3 | 77 |
| 5 | Al-Ittihad FC | 34 | 16 | 7 | 11 | 55 |
| 6 | Al Taawon | 34 | 15 | 8 | 11 | 53 |
| 7 | Al-Ettifaq | 34 | 14 | 8 | 12 | 50 |
| 8 | NEOM | 34 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 45 |
| 9 | Al-Hazm | 34 | 11 | 9 | 14 | 42 |
| 10 | Al-Fayha | 34 | 10 | 8 | 16 | 38 |
| 11 | Al-Fateh | 34 | 9 | 10 | 15 | 37 |
| 12 | Al Khaleej Saihat | 34 | 10 | 7 | 17 | 37 |
| 13 | Al Shabab | 34 | 8 | 11 | 15 | 35 |
| 14 | Al Kholood | 34 | 9 | 6 | 19 | 33 |
| 15 | Al Riyadh | 34 | 7 | 9 | 18 | 30 |
| 16 | Damac | 34 | 6 | 11 | 17 | 29 |
| 17 | Al Akhdoud | 34 | 5 | 5 | 24 | 20 |
| 18 | Al Najma | 34 | 3 | 7 | 24 | 16 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al-Nassr | 34 | 91 | 28 | +63 | 86 |
| 2 | Al-Hilal Saudi FC | 34 | 85 | 27 | +58 | 84 |
| 3 | Al-Qadisiyah FC | 34 | 83 | 34 | +49 | 77 |
| 4 | Al-Ahli Jeddah | 34 | 71 | 25 | +46 | 81 |
| 5 | Al Taawon | 34 | 59 | 46 | +13 | 53 |
| 6 | Al-Ittihad FC | 34 | 55 | 48 | +7 | 55 |
| 7 | Al Khaleej Saihat | 34 | 54 | 62 | -8 | 37 |
| 8 | Al-Ettifaq | 34 | 51 | 55 | -4 | 50 |
| 9 | Al Shabab | 34 | 44 | 57 | -13 | 35 |
| 10 | NEOM | 34 | 43 | 48 | -5 | 45 |
| 11 | Al-Fayha | 34 | 41 | 54 | -13 | 38 |
| 12 | Al-Fateh | 34 | 41 | 55 | -14 | 37 |
| 13 | Al Kholood | 34 | 39 | 61 | -22 | 33 |
| 14 | Al-Hazm | 34 | 38 | 57 | -19 | 42 |
| 15 | Al Riyadh | 34 | 35 | 63 | -28 | 30 |
| 16 | Damac | 34 | 32 | 55 | -23 | 29 |
| 17 | Al Najma | 34 | 32 | 76 | -44 | 16 |
| 18 | Al Akhdoud | 34 | 27 | 70 | -43 | 20 |
| # | TEAM | MP | xG | xGC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Al-Nassr | 34 | 69.8 | 26.0 | +43.8 | 86 |
| 2 | Al-Hilal Saudi FC | 34 | 68.9 | 25.9 | +43.0 | 84 |
| 3 | Al-Ahli Jeddah | 34 | 62.4 | 26.7 | +35.7 | 81 |
| 4 | Al-Qadisiyah FC | 34 | 62.9 | 35.2 | +27.7 | 77 |
| 5 | Al-Ittihad FC | 34 | 49.5 | 41.2 | +8.3 | 55 |
| 6 | NEOM | 34 | 45.8 | 39.4 | +6.4 | 45 |
| 7 | Al Shabab | 34 | 44.1 | 44.7 | -0.6 | 35 |
| 8 | Al Taawon | 34 | 42.0 | 44.7 | -2.7 | 53 |
| 9 | Al Khaleej Saihat | 34 | 42.6 | 46.3 | -3.7 | 37 |
| 10 | Al-Fateh | 34 | 42.5 | 49.6 | -7.1 | 37 |
| 11 | Al Riyadh | 34 | 41.4 | 50.5 | -9.1 | 30 |
| 12 | Al-Fayha | 34 | 33.3 | 43.4 | -10.1 | 38 |
| 13 | Al-Hazm | 34 | 34.1 | 47.4 | -13.3 | 42 |
| 14 | Damac | 34 | 25.1 | 38.5 | -13.4 | 29 |
| 15 | Al-Ettifaq | 34 | 39.0 | 56.5 | -17.5 | 50 |
| 16 | Al Kholood | 34 | 33.2 | 51.5 | -18.3 | 33 |
| 17 | Al Najma | 34 | 28.1 | 61.0 | -32.9 | 16 |
| 18 | Al Akhdoud | 34 | 26.8 | 62.8 | -36.0 | 20 |