Predictions / Football / Saudi-Arabia. Pro League / Al Najma vs Al-Hazm

Prediction Audit: Al Najma vs Al-Hazm Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Al Najma Al Najma
May 09, 2026 - 16:15
2 1.12
2 1.95
xG Accuracy: 77%
Al-Hazm Al-Hazm

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 2–2).

The model had projected Al-Hazm at 55.4%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade C

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Al-Hazm Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-2, 0-1, 0-2, 1-3 2-2 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Moderate Disagreement

The model rates Al-Hazm considerably stronger than the closing betting market.

Largest probability gap: Al-Hazm +8.8 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Al Najma 20.2% 27.2% -7.0 pp Market Higher
Draw 24.5% 26.2% -1.7 pp Aligned
Al-Hazm 55.4% 46.6% +8.8 pp Model Higher

The statistical model estimates Al-Hazm's win probability at 55.4%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 46.6%, a difference of 8.8 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Draw 2–2.

Market Assessment

The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Al-Hazm.

  • Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 3.07) — 4 goals materialised
  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
  • Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile

What failed

  • 1X2: model leaned Al-Hazm; match finished Draw
  • Exact score: outside the model's top score bins

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Al-Hazm by 8.8 percentage points (46.6% vs model 55.4%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. May 07, 2026 · 16:59 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Al Najma 20.2% · Draw 24.5% · Al-Hazm 55.3%
    • xG · Al Najma 1.12 — Al-Hazm 1.95
  2. May 07, 2026 · 16:29 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Al Najma 3.44 · Draw 3.57 · Al-Hazm 2.01
    • Implied 1X2 · Al Najma 27.2% · Draw 26.2% · Al-Hazm 46.6%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. May 07, 2026 · 16:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Al Najma 3.44 · Draw 3.57 · Al-Hazm 2.01
    • Implied 1X2 · Al Najma 27.2% · Draw 26.2% · Al-Hazm 46.6%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. May 09, 2026 · 16:15 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 2–2
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe
Historical Decision No Primary Bet
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 75/100 · High
  • Validation: Pass
Evidence ★★★★★
  • Statistical edge detected
  • Direction agrees with model lean
  • Validation passed
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 56/100
Betting Confidence 78/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 27, 2026 · 06:59 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1971359

Closing Odds 2.01
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · Al Najma 2–2 Al-Hazm
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade C

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Pro League
  • Fixture: Al Najma vs Al-Hazm
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-07 17:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 20.2% · Draw 24.5% · Away 55.3%
  • xG (showing): Al Najma 1.12 — Al-Hazm 1.95 (total xG ≈ 3.07)
  • Primary / headline line (Betting Primary Pick when shown): Over 2.5 goals
  • Model: 59.2% · Implied: 53.7% · Probability edge: +5.5 pts · Est. EV: +7.7%
  • BTTS (model): Yes 59.1% · No 40.9%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (10.1%)

Totals and BTTS are evaluated against current market prices where available.

1X2 can look balanced even when side markets show clearer structure.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 02, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming Pro League Matches Track Al Najma Next Match Prediction Track Al-Hazm Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Get Premium Predictions for Al Najma & Al-Hazm!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Pro League Pro League — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Al-Nassr 34 28 2 4 86
2 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 34 25 9 0 84
3 Al-Ahli Jeddah 34 25 6 3 81
4 Al-Qadisiyah FC 34 23 8 3 77
5 Al-Ittihad FC 34 16 7 11 55
6 Al Taawon 34 15 8 11 53
7 Al-Ettifaq 34 14 8 12 50
8 NEOM 34 12 9 13 45
9 Al-Hazm 34 11 9 14 42
10 Al-Fayha 34 10 8 16 38
11 Al-Fateh 34 9 10 15 37
12 Al Khaleej Saihat 34 10 7 17 37
13 Al Shabab 34 8 11 15 35
14 Al Kholood 34 9 6 19 33
15 Al Riyadh 34 7 9 18 30
16 Damac 34 6 11 17 29
17 Al Akhdoud 34 5 5 24 20
18 Al Najma 34 3 7 24 16
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Al-Nassr 34 91 28 +63 86
2 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 34 85 27 +58 84
3 Al-Qadisiyah FC 34 83 34 +49 77
4 Al-Ahli Jeddah 34 71 25 +46 81
5 Al Taawon 34 59 46 +13 53
6 Al-Ittihad FC 34 55 48 +7 55
7 Al Khaleej Saihat 34 54 62 -8 37
8 Al-Ettifaq 34 51 55 -4 50
9 Al Shabab 34 44 57 -13 35
10 NEOM 34 43 48 -5 45
11 Al-Fayha 34 41 54 -13 38
12 Al-Fateh 34 41 55 -14 37
13 Al Kholood 34 39 61 -22 33
14 Al-Hazm 34 38 57 -19 42
15 Al Riyadh 34 35 63 -28 30
16 Damac 34 32 55 -23 29
17 Al Najma 34 32 76 -44 16
18 Al Akhdoud 34 27 70 -43 20
# TEAM MP xG xGC +/- PTS
1 Al-Nassr 34 69.8 26.0 +43.8 86
2 Al-Hilal Saudi FC 34 68.9 25.9 +43.0 84
3 Al-Ahli Jeddah 34 62.4 26.7 +35.7 81
4 Al-Qadisiyah FC 34 62.9 35.2 +27.7 77
5 Al-Ittihad FC 34 49.5 41.2 +8.3 55
6 NEOM 34 45.8 39.4 +6.4 45
7 Al Shabab 34 44.1 44.7 -0.6 35
8 Al Taawon 34 42.0 44.7 -2.7 53
9 Al Khaleej Saihat 34 42.6 46.3 -3.7 37
10 Al-Fateh 34 42.5 49.6 -7.1 37
11 Al Riyadh 34 41.4 50.5 -9.1 30
12 Al-Fayha 34 33.3 43.4 -10.1 38
13 Al-Hazm 34 34.1 47.4 -13.3 42
14 Damac 34 25.1 38.5 -13.4 29
15 Al-Ettifaq 34 39.0 56.5 -17.5 50
16 Al Kholood 34 33.2 51.5 -18.3 33
17 Al Najma 34 28.1 61.0 -32.9 16
18 Al Akhdoud 34 26.8 62.8 -36.0 20