AI correctly predicted the Cacereño win.
The match finished 4–1, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (5 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Cacereño Cacereño ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 0-1, 1-2, 1-0, 0-2 4-1 ✖ Incorrect
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cacereño | 41.8% | 31.9% | +9.9 pp | Model Higher |
| Draw | 25.7% | 27.6% | -1.9 pp | Aligned |
| Real Madrid II | 32.6% | 40.5% | -7.9 pp | Market Higher |
The statistical model estimates Cacereño's win probability at 41.8%, compared with the closing market's implied probability of 31.9%, a difference of 9.9 percentage points. This highlights a substantial disagreement between the model's assessment and the market consensus, rather than indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Cacereño win 4–1).
Market Assessment
The fair estimate shows a modest edge over current market pricing on Cacereño.
- Monitor line movement before kickoff — not a betting recommendation.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.70) — 5 goals materialised
- Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
- Exact score: outside the model's top score bins
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Cacereño more conservatively (31.9% vs model 41.8%, 9.9 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Cacereño win 4–1).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
May 10, 2026 · 15:59 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Cacereño 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Real Madrid II 32.6%
- xG · Cacereño 1.45 — Real Madrid II 1.25
-
May 10, 2026 · 15:30 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Cacereño 2.91 · Draw 3.36 · Real Madrid II 2.29
- Implied 1X2 · Cacereño 31.9% · Draw 27.6% · Real Madrid II 40.5%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 10, 2026 · 15:59 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Cacereño 2.91 · Draw 3.36 · Real Madrid II 2.29
- Implied 1X2 · Cacereño 31.9% · Draw 27.6% · Real Madrid II 40.5%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 09, 2026 · 19:00 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Cacereño win · 4–1
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Pass
- Statistical edge detected
- Direction agrees with model lean
- Validation passed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Cacereño & Real Madrid II!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Primera División RFEF - Group 1 — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tenerife | 38 | 22 | 10 | 6 | 76 |
| 2 | Celta de Vigo II | 38 | 18 | 11 | 9 | 65 |
| 3 | Zamora | 38 | 17 | 10 | 11 | 61 |
| 4 | Ponferradina | 38 | 17 | 9 | 12 | 60 |
| 5 | Real Madrid U21 | 36 | 16 | 8 | 12 | 56 |
| 5 | Real Madrid II | 38 | 16 | 10 | 12 | 58 |
| 6 | Pontevedra | 38 | 14 | 16 | 8 | 58 |
| 7 | Barakaldo | 38 | 15 | 13 | 10 | 58 |
| 8 | Unionistas de Salamanca | 38 | 15 | 11 | 12 | 56 |
| 9 | Lugo | 38 | 13 | 14 | 11 | 53 |
| 10 | Mérida AD | 38 | 14 | 10 | 14 | 52 |
| 11 | Arenas Getxo | 38 | 15 | 7 | 16 | 52 |
| 12 | Racing Ferrol | 38 | 13 | 10 | 15 | 49 |
| 13 | Athletic Club II | 38 | 13 | 10 | 15 | 49 |
| 14 | Real Avilés | 38 | 11 | 11 | 16 | 44 |
| 15 | Cacereño | 38 | 10 | 14 | 14 | 44 |
| 16 | CF Talavera | 38 | 11 | 10 | 17 | 43 |
| 17 | Ourense CF | 38 | 10 | 13 | 15 | 43 |
| 18 | Guadalajara | 38 | 10 | 11 | 17 | 41 |
| 19 | Osasuna II | 38 | 10 | 10 | 18 | 40 |
| 20 | Arenteiro | 38 | 6 | 10 | 22 | 28 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tenerife | 38 | 62 | 24 | +38 | 76 |
| 2 | Celta de Vigo II | 38 | 61 | 48 | +13 | 65 |
| 3 | Real Madrid II | 38 | 61 | 52 | +9 | 58 |
| 4 | Real Madrid U21 | 36 | 56 | 47 | +9 | 56 |
| 5 | Real Avilés | 38 | 55 | 67 | -12 | 44 |
| 6 | Zamora | 38 | 53 | 42 | +11 | 61 |
| 7 | Unionistas de Salamanca | 38 | 53 | 49 | +4 | 56 |
| 8 | Barakaldo | 38 | 51 | 38 | +13 | 58 |
| 9 | Pontevedra | 38 | 49 | 31 | +18 | 58 |
| 10 | Mérida AD | 38 | 47 | 53 | -6 | 52 |
| 11 | Arenas Getxo | 38 | 46 | 55 | -9 | 52 |
| 12 | Ourense CF | 38 | 44 | 47 | -3 | 43 |
| 13 | Guadalajara | 38 | 44 | 58 | -14 | 41 |
| 14 | Ponferradina | 38 | 43 | 33 | +10 | 60 |
| 15 | Cacereño | 38 | 42 | 49 | -7 | 44 |
| 16 | Racing Ferrol | 38 | 41 | 47 | -6 | 49 |
| 17 | Athletic Club II | 38 | 38 | 46 | -8 | 49 |
| 18 | CF Talavera | 38 | 38 | 47 | -9 | 43 |
| 19 | Lugo | 38 | 36 | 40 | -4 | 53 |
| 20 | Arenteiro | 38 | 29 | 53 | -24 | 28 |
| 21 | Osasuna II | 38 | 28 | 42 | -14 | 40 |