AI correctly predicted the Albirex Niigata S win.
The match finished 1–0, validating the model's directional assessment.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Under 2.5 (1 goals) ✔ Correct
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes No ✖ Incorrect
- 1X2 Albirex Niigata S Albirex Niigata S ✔ Correct
- Correct Score Insights 2-0, 3-0, 2-1, 1-0, 3-1 1-0 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Albirex Niigata S | 41.8% | 88.3% | -46.5 pp | Market Higher |
| Draw | 25.7% | 6.9% | +18.8 pp | Model Edge |
| Young Lions | 32.6% | 4.8% | +27.8 pp | Model Edge |
The closing market estimates Albirex Niigata S's win probability at 88.3%, compared with the model's estimate of 41.8%, a difference of 46.5 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the model's directional lean matched the result (Albirex Niigata S win 1–0).
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Under 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile
- Exact score 1–0 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS Yes; match finished BTTS No
Market lesson
Large model–market gaps do not automatically mean the market is right. Here the closing market priced Albirex Niigata S higher (88.3% vs model 41.8%, 46.5 pp), but the model's lean was validated (Albirex Niigata S win 1–0).
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
May 04, 2026 · 11:29 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Albirex Niigata S 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Young Lions 32.6%
- xG · Albirex Niigata S 1.45 — Young Lions 1.25
-
May 04, 2026 · 10:59 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Albirex Niigata S 1.04 · Draw 13.32 · Young Lions 19.16
- Implied 1X2 · Albirex Niigata S 88.3% · Draw 6.9% · Young Lions 4.8%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 04, 2026 · 11:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Albirex Niigata S 1.04 · Draw 13.32 · Young Lions 19.16
- Implied 1X2 · Albirex Niigata S 88.3% · Draw 6.9% · Young Lions 4.8%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 04, 2026 · 11:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Albirex Niigata S win · 1–0
-
FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Fail
- Large market gap (47 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Market strongly disagrees on price
- Validation failed
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Albirex Niigata S & Young Lions!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Premier League — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Home United | 20 | 16 | 3 | 1 | 51 |
| 2 | Albirex Niigata S | 21 | 15 | 2 | 4 | 47 |
| 3 | Tampines Rovers | 20 | 14 | 4 | 2 | 46 |
| 4 | Balestier Khalsa | 21 | 11 | 2 | 8 | 35 |
| 5 | Geylang International | 21 | 7 | 3 | 11 | 24 |
| 6 | Hougang United | 20 | 7 | 0 | 13 | 21 |
| 7 | Young Lions | 21 | 2 | 3 | 16 | 9 |
| 8 | Tanjong Pagar | 20 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 4 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Home United | 20 | 68 | 11 | +57 | 51 |
| 2 | Tampines Rovers | 20 | 55 | 19 | +36 | 46 |
| 3 | Albirex Niigata S | 21 | 47 | 19 | +28 | 47 |
| 4 | Balestier Khalsa | 21 | 44 | 46 | -2 | 35 |
| 5 | Geylang International | 21 | 29 | 42 | -13 | 24 |
| 6 | Hougang United | 20 | 23 | 39 | -16 | 21 |
| 7 | Young Lions | 21 | 15 | 58 | -43 | 9 |
| 8 | Tanjong Pagar | 20 | 15 | 62 | -47 | 4 |
