Prediction Audit: Füzesabony vs DEAC Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

May 17, 2026 - 15:00
1 1.45
4 1.25
xG Accuracy: 42%

The model missed the final outcome (DEAC win 1–4).

The model had projected Füzesabony at 41.8%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (5 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Füzesabony DEAC ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 0-1, 1-1, 0-2, 1-2, 0-0 1-4 ✖ Incorrect

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.70) — 5 goals materialised

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (5 goals)

Market lesson

The full-time result was DEAC win 1–4, which did not match the model's pre-match lean on 1X2.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. May 09, 2026 · 16:49 UTC Forecast generated
    • xG · Füzesabony 1.45 — DEAC 1.25
  2. May 17, 2026 · 15:00 UTC Kickoff
  3. FT Full-time result DEAC win · 1–4
  4. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  5. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe
Historical Decision No Primary Bet
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 57/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Pending
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Market has already priced much of the edge
  • Validation pending
Market Compatibility 100/100
Betting Confidence 59/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 06, 2026 · 00:28 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3087378

Closing Odds Pending
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result DEAC win · Füzesabony 1–4 DEAC
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Quick read on how the model reads this matchup.

  • League: NB III - Northeast
  • Fixture: Füzesabony vs DEAC
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-17 15:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
  • xG (showing): Füzesabony 1.45 — DEAC 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 54.4% · Over 2.5 45.6%); BTTS No (Yes 47.3% · No 52.7%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 47.3% · No 52.7%
  • Correct score (top bin): 0-1 (13.5%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 02, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Füzesabony & DEAC!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
NB III - Northeast NB III - Northeast — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Kisvárda II 30 20 7 3 67
2 Cigand SE 30 18 7 5 61
3 DEAC 30 18 7 5 61
4 Tiszafuredi VSE 30 16 8 6 56
5 Debrecen II 30 16 7 7 55
6 Tarpa 30 12 11 7 47
7 Gödöllő 30 11 7 12 40
8 Diósgyőr II 30 11 5 14 38
9 Nyiregyhaza II 30 11 4 15 37
10 Eger 30 11 4 15 37
11 Tiszaújváros 30 9 7 14 34
12 Putnok VSE 30 9 5 16 32
13 Füzesabony 30 7 9 14 30
14 Ózd Sajóvölgye 30 7 8 15 29
15 Sényő Carnifex 30 7 7 16 28
16 FC Hatvan 30 5 1 24 16
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Cigand SE 30 66 30 +36 61
2 Debrecen II 30 66 40 +26 55
3 Nyiregyhaza II 30 65 56 +9 37
4 DEAC 30 63 29 +34 61
5 Tiszafuredi VSE 30 61 36 +25 56
6 Kisvárda II 30 60 22 +38 67
7 Gödöllő 30 52 44 +8 40
8 Ózd Sajóvölgye 30 51 68 -17 29
9 Diósgyőr II 30 48 58 -10 38
10 Eger 30 46 71 -25 37
11 Putnok VSE 30 44 52 -8 32
12 Tiszaújváros 30 41 66 -25 34
13 Tarpa 30 39 28 +11 47
14 FC Hatvan 30 37 81 -44 16
15 Sényő Carnifex 30 32 74 -42 28
16 Füzesabony 30 25 41 -16 30