Prediction Audit: Tus Dassendorf vs HEBC Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

May 15, 2026 - 17:00
2 1.45
1 1.25
xG Accuracy: 80%

AI correctly predicted the Tus Dassendorf win.

The match finished 2–1, validating the model's directional assessment.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade A

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Over 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✔ Correct
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
  • 1X2 Tus Dassendorf Tus Dassendorf ✔ Correct
  • Correct Score Insights 2-1, 3-1, 1-1, 2-0, 3-0 2-1 ✔ Correct

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.70) — 3 goals materialised
  • Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
  • Over 2.5 goals aligned with the xG profile

Market lesson

The model's directional lean matched the full-time result (Tus Dassendorf win 2–1).

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. May 09, 2026 · 03:09 UTC Forecast generated
    • xG · Tus Dassendorf 1.45 — HEBC 1.25
  2. May 15, 2026 · 17:00 UTC Kickoff
  3. FT Full-time result Tus Dassendorf win · 2–1
  4. FT Prediction validated Directional lean matched full-time result
  5. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Observe
Historical Decision No Primary Bet
Outcome Validated
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 57/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Pending
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Market has already priced much of the edge
  • Validation pending
Market Compatibility 100/100
Betting Confidence 59/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Jul 26, 2026 · 02:57 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-1804503

Closing Odds Pending
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Tus Dassendorf win · Tus Dassendorf 2–1 HEBC
Prediction ✔ Correct
Decision Grade A

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Below is a compact, numbers-first snapshot aligned with the same engine as the cards above.

  • League: Oberliga - Hamburg
  • Fixture: Tus Dassendorf vs HEBC
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-16 11:00:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
  • xG (showing): Tus Dassendorf 1.45 — HEBC 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
  • Value headline: None — no positive EV could be estimated on tracked lines at current best prices (missing odds or thin book depth).
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5 (Under 2.5 28.5% · Over 2.5 71.5%); BTTS Yes (Yes 60.2% · No 39.8%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Over 2.5; BTTS Yes
  • BTTS (model): Yes 60.2% · No 39.8%
  • Correct score (top bin): 2-1 (9.3%)

The decision block shows no default Primary: Primary needs consensus EV ≥ +5.0% plus strength/reliability/calibration gates. A separate Lean/tracked gate is +2.0% (selective only). Lean labels are directional only — not bankroll-sized recommendations.

Most likely correct score stays a low-probability tail: use it for context, not as a must-bet story.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: No Primary Bet

Outcome: Validated — Pre-match lean validated against the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 02, 2026 (UTC)

Get Premium Predictions for Tus Dassendorf & HEBC!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Oberliga - Hamburg Oberliga - Hamburg — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 ETSV Hamburg 34 26 5 3 83
2 Eimsbütteler TV 34 24 6 4 78
3 Tus Dassendorf 34 24 4 6 76
4 Victoria Hamburg 34 18 10 6 64
5 Paloma 34 18 7 9 61
6 HT16 34 18 3 13 57
7 Teutonia Ottensen 34 17 1 16 52
8 Süderelbe 34 15 6 13 51
9 Niendorfer TSV 34 14 9 12 50
10 Sasel 34 14 8 12 50
11 Harksheide 34 14 3 17 45
12 Buchholz 34 14 2 18 44
13 HEBC 34 10 8 16 38
14 Vorwärts-Wacker 04 34 11 5 18 38
15 Nikola Tesla 34 11 4 19 37
16 Türkiye 34 7 8 19 29
17 Halstenbek-Rellingen 34 3 3 29 12
18 Curslack-Neuengamme 34 2 2 30 8
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 ETSV Hamburg 34 126 27 +99 83
2 Tus Dassendorf 34 101 34 +67 76
3 Eimsbütteler TV 34 101 44 +57 78
4 Sasel 34 91 88 +3 50
5 Buchholz 34 87 80 +7 44
6 HT16 34 85 85 0 57
7 Paloma 34 84 50 +34 61
8 Victoria Hamburg 34 83 48 +35 64
9 Niendorfer TSV 34 75 57 +18 50
10 Süderelbe 34 72 64 +8 51
11 Nikola Tesla 34 70 95 -25 37
12 Harksheide 34 65 92 -27 45
13 Vorwärts-Wacker 04 34 62 85 -23 38
14 Türkiye 34 59 106 -47 29
15 Teutonia Ottensen 34 57 66 -9 52
16 HEBC 34 48 66 -18 38
17 Curslack-Neuengamme 34 46 162 -116 8
18 Halstenbek-Rellingen 34 44 107 -63 12