The model missed the final outcome (Quick Boys win 1–2).
The model had projected Kozakken Boys at 41.8%, but the full-time result went the other way.
Tracked markets vs full-time result
Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.
- Market Prediction Result Outcome
- Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (3 goals) ✖ Incorrect
- Both Teams To Score BTTS Yes Yes ✔ Correct
- 1X2 Kozakken Boys Quick Boys ✖ Incorrect
- Correct Score Insights 1-1, 1-2, 0-1, 0-2, 2-1 1-2 ✔ Correct
Model vs Closing Market
| Outcome | Model | Closing Market | Difference | Signal |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kozakken Boys | 41.8% | 21.0% | +20.7 pp | Model Edge |
| Draw | 25.7% | 21.3% | +4.3 pp | Aligned |
| Quick Boys | 32.6% | 57.6% | -25.1 pp | Market Higher |
The closing market estimates Quick Boys's win probability at 57.6%, compared with the model's estimate of 32.6%, a difference of 25.1 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.
Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.
After full time, the result was Quick Boys win 1–2.
Post Match Insights
What worked
- Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.70) — 3 goals materialised
- Both Teams To Score (Yes) matched the full-time result
- Exact score 1–2 fell within the model's highlighted bins
What failed
- Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (3 goals)
- 1X2: model leaned Kozakken Boys; match finished Quick Boys
Market lesson
The closing market differed from the model on Kozakken Boys by 25.1 percentage points (66.8% vs model 41.8%) — in this case the market view proved closer.
Prediction Timeline
How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.
-
May 23, 2026 · 18:43 UTC Forecast generated
- Model 1X2 · Kozakken Boys 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Quick Boys 32.6%
- xG · Kozakken Boys 1.45 — Quick Boys 1.25
-
May 23, 2026 · 12:59 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
- 1X2 odds · Kozakken Boys 4.30 · Draw 4.24 · Quick Boys 1.57
- Implied 1X2 · Kozakken Boys 21.0% · Draw 21.3% · Quick Boys 57.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 23, 2026 · 13:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
- 1X2 odds · Kozakken Boys 4.30 · Draw 4.24 · Quick Boys 1.57
- Implied 1X2 · Kozakken Boys 21.0% · Draw 21.3% · Quick Boys 57.6%
- Bookmaker · Pinnacle
-
May 23, 2026 · 13:30 UTC Kickoff
-
FT Full-time result Quick Boys win · 1–2
-
FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
-
Archived Prediction review
Historical Snapshot
Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.
Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
- Validation: Warning
- Large market gap (25 pp)
- No strong statistical edge
- Market strongly disagrees on price
- Validation warning
Validation Report
Immutable SnapshotModel Performance
This prediction contributes to:
- Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%
Review FAQ
- How accurate was the prediction?
- This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
- What does xG Accuracy measure?
- xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
- Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
- Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
- Does this improve the AI record?
- Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.
Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.
Explore More Predictions Content
Get Premium Predictions for Kozakken Boys & Quick Boys!
Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.
Subscribe Now
Tweede Divisie — Standings
| # | TEAM | MP | W | D | L | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Quick Boys | 34 | 19 | 10 | 5 | 66 |
| 2 | De Treffers | 34 | 18 | 9 | 7 | 63 |
| 3 | Hoek | 34 | 19 | 6 | 9 | 63 |
| 4 | Rijnsburgse Boys | 34 | 16 | 8 | 10 | 56 |
| 5 | HHC | 34 | 17 | 5 | 12 | 56 |
| 6 | Spakenburg | 34 | 16 | 8 | 10 | 56 |
| 7 | Katwijk | 34 | 15 | 7 | 12 | 52 |
| 8 | Almere City II | 34 | 15 | 5 | 14 | 50 |
| 9 | Kozakken Boys | 34 | 13 | 8 | 13 | 47 |
| 10 | Sparta Rotterdam II | 34 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 45 |
| 11 | AFC Amsterdam | 34 | 12 | 9 | 13 | 45 |
| 12 | Barendrecht | 34 | 13 | 4 | 17 | 43 |
| 13 | RKAV Volendam | 34 | 13 | 3 | 18 | 42 |
| 14 | GVVV Veenendaal | 34 | 12 | 6 | 16 | 42 |
| 15 | Koninklijke HFC | 34 | 12 | 3 | 19 | 39 |
| 16 | Ijsselmeervogels | 34 | 9 | 4 | 21 | 31 |
| 17 | Excelsior Maassluis | 34 | 8 | 7 | 19 | 31 |
| 18 | ACV | 34 | 7 | 9 | 18 | 30 |
| # | TEAM | MP | GS | GC | +/- | PTS |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rijnsburgse Boys | 34 | 76 | 55 | +21 | 56 |
| 2 | Spakenburg | 34 | 72 | 60 | +12 | 56 |
| 3 | Sparta Rotterdam II | 34 | 71 | 73 | -2 | 45 |
| 4 | Almere City II | 34 | 70 | 62 | +8 | 50 |
| 5 | Quick Boys | 34 | 69 | 35 | +34 | 66 |
| 6 | De Treffers | 34 | 64 | 37 | +27 | 63 |
| 7 | Barendrecht | 34 | 62 | 84 | -22 | 43 |
| 8 | Hoek | 34 | 60 | 37 | +23 | 63 |
| 9 | Katwijk | 34 | 60 | 55 | +5 | 52 |
| 10 | HHC | 34 | 58 | 44 | +14 | 56 |
| 11 | GVVV Veenendaal | 34 | 52 | 67 | -15 | 42 |
| 12 | RKAV Volendam | 34 | 50 | 62 | -12 | 42 |
| 13 | ACV | 34 | 48 | 71 | -23 | 30 |
| 14 | Kozakken Boys | 34 | 47 | 55 | -8 | 47 |
| 15 | AFC Amsterdam | 34 | 46 | 54 | -8 | 45 |
| 16 | Ijsselmeervogels | 34 | 46 | 65 | -19 | 31 |
| 17 | Excelsior Maassluis | 34 | 39 | 58 | -19 | 31 |
| 18 | Koninklijke HFC | 34 | 33 | 49 | -16 | 39 |