Predictions / Football / Netherlands. Tweede Divisie / Quick Boys vs Ijsselmeervogels

Prediction Audit: Quick Boys vs Ijsselmeervogels Prediction, Odds & AI Betting Tips

Quick Boys Quick Boys
May 16, 2026 - 13:30
2 1.45
2 1.25
xG Accuracy: 70%
Ijsselmeervogels Ijsselmeervogels

The model missed the final outcome (Draw 2–2).

The model had projected Quick Boys at 41.8%, but the full-time result went the other way.

Tracked markets vs full-time result

Prediction grade F

Each row compares the pre-match model lean to the full-time result.

  • Market Prediction Result Outcome
  • Over / Under 2.5 Under 2.5 Over 2.5 (4 goals) ✖ Incorrect
  • Both Teams To Score BTTS No Yes ✖ Incorrect
  • 1X2 Quick Boys Draw ✖ Incorrect
  • Correct Score Insights 1-1, 2-1, 1-0, 2-0, 3-1 2-2 ✖ Incorrect

Model vs Closing Market

Strong Disagreement

The closing market prices Quick Boys higher than the statistical model.

Largest probability gap: Quick Boys -21.8 pp

Outcome Model Closing Market Difference Signal
Quick Boys 41.8% 63.6% -21.8 pp Market Higher
Draw 25.7% 18.8% +6.9 pp Model Higher
Ijsselmeervogels 32.6% 17.6% +15.0 pp Model Edge

The closing market estimates Quick Boys's win probability at 63.6%, compared with the model's estimate of 41.8%, a difference of 21.8 percentage points. This highlights a disagreement between the model and market consensus, without indicating which view is ultimately correct.

Model probabilities are generated from the statistical xG model using a Poisson distribution. Closing market probabilities are derived from consensus closing 1X2 odds after margin removal. Values represent implied probabilities rather than betting recommendations. Closing snapshot: PRE1.

After full time, the result was Draw 2–2.

Post Match Insights

What worked

  • Expected goals projected a high-scoring match (ΣxG 2.70) — 4 goals materialised

What failed

  • Both Teams To Score: model leaned BTTS No; match finished BTTS Yes
  • Over / Under 2.5: model leaned Under 2.5; match finished Over 2.5 (4 goals)

Market lesson

The closing market differed from the model on Quick Boys by 21.8 percentage points (63.6% vs model 41.8%) — in this case the market view proved closer.

Premium betting site stake: New users can use the promo code FHn2uDc1 to receive $100 cash.

Prediction Timeline

How this prediction moved from forecast to full-time review.

  1. May 16, 2026 · 13:29 UTC Forecast generated
    • Model 1X2 · Quick Boys 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Ijsselmeervogels 32.6%
    • xG · Quick Boys 1.45 — Ijsselmeervogels 1.25
  2. May 16, 2026 · 13:01 UTC Opening odds snapshot PRE30
    • 1X2 odds · Quick Boys 1.42 · Draw 4.81 · Ijsselmeervogels 5.13
    • Implied 1X2 · Quick Boys 63.6% · Draw 18.8% · Ijsselmeervogels 17.6%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  3. May 16, 2026 · 13:29 UTC Closing snapshot recorded PRE1
    • 1X2 odds · Quick Boys 1.42 · Draw 4.81 · Ijsselmeervogels 5.13
    • Implied 1X2 · Quick Boys 63.6% · Draw 18.8% · Ijsselmeervogels 17.6%
    • Bookmaker · Pinnacle
  4. May 16, 2026 · 13:30 UTC Kickoff
  5. FT Full-time result Draw · 2–2
  6. FT Prediction missed 1X2 lean did not match full-time result
  7. Archived Prediction review

Historical Snapshot

Frozen at kickoff — the model output as it stood before the match started.

Historical verdict: Cautious / Wait

Historical label: Originally displayed as "Wait for validation".

Historical Decision Wait
Outcome Missed
Pre-match metrics (historical context)
Prediction Reliability 52/100 · Moderate
  • Validation: Warning
  • Large market gap (22 pp)
Evidence ★★★★★
  • No strong statistical edge
  • Pricing remains divergent
  • Validation warning
Pricing proximity (inverse gap) 0/100
Betting Confidence 33/100

Validation Report

Immutable Snapshot

Prediction Time: Aug 09, 2026 · 07:08 UTC Snapshot ID: dp-3392128

Closing Odds 1.42
AI Fair Odds —
CLV Pending
Final Result Draw · Quick Boys 2–2 Ijsselmeervogels
Prediction ✖ Missed
Decision Grade F

Model Performance

This prediction contributes to:

  • Primary Bets ROI (180d): -100.0%

Review FAQ

How accurate was the prediction?
This page grades directional markets (1X2, Over/Under 2.5, BTTS) against the full-time result. The prediction grade reflects how many of those tracked markets matched reality.
What does xG Accuracy measure?
xG Accuracy compares the model's pre-match expected-goals profile to the actual scoreline — not whether every market hit. A strong directional review can coexist with a moderate xG accuracy score.
Why wasn't the exact score predicted?
Correct-score outcomes are low-probability tails even when the model reads the match profile well. We highlight top score bins for context; missing the exact line does not invalidate a directional review.
Does this improve the AI record?
Each finished match is logged in our validation pipeline. Aggregated hit rates and CLV studies are published separately — this page is the per-match audit trail.

Predictions are for informational purposes only. Always gamble responsibly and within your limits. Past performance does not guarantee future results.

AI match briefing

AI Match Summary

Pre-match snapshot for this fixture.

  • League: Tweede Divisie
  • Fixture: Quick Boys vs Ijsselmeervogels
  • Kickoff: 2026-05-16 13:30:00
  • 1X2 (model): Home 41.8% · Draw 25.7% · Away 32.6%
  • xG (showing): Quick Boys 1.45 — Ijsselmeervogels 1.25 (total xG ≈ 2.7)
  • Value headline: At least one tracked line reaches the headline EV threshold — align with the hero / Primary card if shown.
  • Structural leans (not bets): Structural lean (model): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5 (Under 2.5 41.2% · Over 2.5 58.8%); BTTS Yes (Yes 53.8% · No 46.2%) Value lean (pricing): O/U 2.5 Under 2.5; BTTS No
  • BTTS (model): Yes 53.8% · No 46.2%
  • Correct score (top bin): 1-1 (10.3%)

Saying “no value” on a snapshot is a feature, not a bug: it protects readers from forcing a play when the edge is not there.

If lines move materially, re-run generation or refresh — implied probabilities and any future EV readouts will change first.

Historical Recommendation

Historical Decision: Wait

Outcome: Missed — Pre-match 1X2 lean did not match the full-time result.

Risk Factors Considered Before Kickoff

  • Price movement: implied probabilities and EV move with odds.
  • Sample / data gaps: low-information leagues widen forecast bands.
  • In-play state: goals and red cards are not modelled here.
  • Scoreline variance: the most likely scoreline is still usually a low absolute probability outcome (often well below 20%).

Last Updated

October 02, 2026 (UTC)

Related Predictions

See Upcoming Tweede Divisie Matches Track Quick Boys Next Match Prediction Track Ijsselmeervogels Next Match Prediction View Today's Football Predictions

Get Premium Predictions for Quick Boys & Ijsselmeervogels!

Unlock in-depth analysis, exclusive betting tips, and match forecasts with our premium subscription service.

Subscribe Now
Back to Predictions
Tweede Divisie Tweede Divisie — Standings
# TEAM MP W D L PTS
1 Quick Boys 34 19 10 5 66
2 De Treffers 34 18 9 7 63
3 Hoek 34 19 6 9 63
4 Rijnsburgse Boys 34 16 8 10 56
5 HHC 34 17 5 12 56
6 Spakenburg 34 16 8 10 56
7 Katwijk 34 15 7 12 52
8 Almere City II 34 15 5 14 50
9 Kozakken Boys 34 13 8 13 47
10 Sparta Rotterdam II 34 12 9 13 45
11 AFC Amsterdam 34 12 9 13 45
12 Barendrecht 34 13 4 17 43
13 RKAV Volendam 34 13 3 18 42
14 GVVV Veenendaal 34 12 6 16 42
15 Koninklijke HFC 34 12 3 19 39
16 Ijsselmeervogels 34 9 4 21 31
17 Excelsior Maassluis 34 8 7 19 31
18 ACV 34 7 9 18 30
# TEAM MP GS GC +/- PTS
1 Rijnsburgse Boys 34 76 55 +21 56
2 Spakenburg 34 72 60 +12 56
3 Sparta Rotterdam II 34 71 73 -2 45
4 Almere City II 34 70 62 +8 50
5 Quick Boys 34 69 35 +34 66
6 De Treffers 34 64 37 +27 63
7 Barendrecht 34 62 84 -22 43
8 Hoek 34 60 37 +23 63
9 Katwijk 34 60 55 +5 52
10 HHC 34 58 44 +14 56
11 GVVV Veenendaal 34 52 67 -15 42
12 RKAV Volendam 34 50 62 -12 42
13 ACV 34 48 71 -23 30
14 Kozakken Boys 34 47 55 -8 47
15 AFC Amsterdam 34 46 54 -8 45
16 Ijsselmeervogels 34 46 65 -19 31
17 Excelsior Maassluis 34 39 58 -19 31
18 Koninklijke HFC 34 33 49 -16 39
Tweede Divisie Netherlands. Tweede Divisie Predictions